社区获得性压力损伤患者的特点。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70128
Midori Nagano, Yoshiko Kubo, Akiko Egawa, Masayo Kobayashi, Masami Sato
{"title":"社区获得性压力损伤患者的特点。","authors":"Midori Nagano, Yoshiko Kubo, Akiko Egawa, Masayo Kobayashi, Masami Sato","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>(1) To classify patients with community-acquired pressure injury (CAPI) according to the risk factors of PI and to assess validity of the classified groups. (2) To clarify characteristics of each group for CAPI prevention and care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is designed to classify CAPI patients into clusters based on a retrospective study of medical records, followed by cluster analysis and description of each cluster's characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk factors and status of CAPI, as well as discharge destination, were investigated based on 1 year's worth of medical records of patients with CAPI on hospital admission during 2018-2019. After calculating descriptive statistics, cluster analysis was conducted by Ward's method of Euclidean distance referring to risk factors of PI. Lastly, each of the defined clusters underwent multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 324 patients with CAPI, 272 patients were selected as the study subjects, due to availability of sufficient information regarding risk factors of PI. After classification into three groups, data were interpreted by Euclidean distance and comparison between 'attribute and risk factors of PI' and 'PI and destinations after discharge'.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients with CAPI were classified into three clusters and validity of the classification was assessed. Patients who had 'maintained ADL', as well as cognitive status, were expected to be capable of self-care and self-management. Patients with 'low ADL' were characterised by insufficient self-care or home care resulting in having CAPI and would require aged care service. Patients who were at 'very high risk' of having PI were characterised by incurring significant burden on caregivers and need of medical services that prospects terminal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 1","pages":"e70128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Patients With Community-Acquired Pressure Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Midori Nagano, Yoshiko Kubo, Akiko Egawa, Masayo Kobayashi, Masami Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>(1) To classify patients with community-acquired pressure injury (CAPI) according to the risk factors of PI and to assess validity of the classified groups. (2) To clarify characteristics of each group for CAPI prevention and care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is designed to classify CAPI patients into clusters based on a retrospective study of medical records, followed by cluster analysis and description of each cluster's characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk factors and status of CAPI, as well as discharge destination, were investigated based on 1 year's worth of medical records of patients with CAPI on hospital admission during 2018-2019. After calculating descriptive statistics, cluster analysis was conducted by Ward's method of Euclidean distance referring to risk factors of PI. Lastly, each of the defined clusters underwent multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 324 patients with CAPI, 272 patients were selected as the study subjects, due to availability of sufficient information regarding risk factors of PI. After classification into three groups, data were interpreted by Euclidean distance and comparison between 'attribute and risk factors of PI' and 'PI and destinations after discharge'.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients with CAPI were classified into three clusters and validity of the classification was assessed. Patients who had 'maintained ADL', as well as cognitive status, were expected to be capable of self-care and self-management. Patients with 'low ADL' were characterised by insufficient self-care or home care resulting in having CAPI and would require aged care service. Patients who were at 'very high risk' of having PI were characterised by incurring significant burden on caregivers and need of medical services that prospects terminal care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"e70128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(1)根据社区获得性压力损伤(community acquired pressure injury, CAPI)的危险因素对其进行分类,并评价分类组的有效性。(2)明确CAPI预防和护理各群体的特点。设计:本研究旨在通过对医疗记录的回顾性研究将CAPI患者分类,然后进行聚类分析并描述每个聚类的特征。方法:根据2018-2019年住院CAPI患者1年的病历资料,调查CAPI的危险因素、病情及出院目的地。计算描述性统计后,参照PI的危险因素,采用Ward的欧氏距离法进行聚类分析。最后,每个定义的集群都进行了多次比较。结果:从324例CAPI患者中,由于有足够的关于PI危险因素的信息,选择了272例患者作为研究对象。将数据分为三组,采用欧几里得距离和“PI属性与危险因素”、“PI与出院后目的地”的比较对数据进行解释。患者或公众贡献:将CAPI患者分为三组,并评估分类的有效性。“维持ADL”的患者,以及认知状态,被认为有能力自我照顾和自我管理。“低ADL”患者的特点是自我护理或家庭护理不足,导致CAPI,需要老年护理服务。具有“非常高风险”的PI患者的特点是给护理人员带来了巨大的负担,并且需要医疗服务来进行临终护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of Patients With Community-Acquired Pressure Injuries.

Aim: (1) To classify patients with community-acquired pressure injury (CAPI) according to the risk factors of PI and to assess validity of the classified groups. (2) To clarify characteristics of each group for CAPI prevention and care.

Design: This study is designed to classify CAPI patients into clusters based on a retrospective study of medical records, followed by cluster analysis and description of each cluster's characteristics.

Methods: Risk factors and status of CAPI, as well as discharge destination, were investigated based on 1 year's worth of medical records of patients with CAPI on hospital admission during 2018-2019. After calculating descriptive statistics, cluster analysis was conducted by Ward's method of Euclidean distance referring to risk factors of PI. Lastly, each of the defined clusters underwent multiple comparisons.

Results: From 324 patients with CAPI, 272 patients were selected as the study subjects, due to availability of sufficient information regarding risk factors of PI. After classification into three groups, data were interpreted by Euclidean distance and comparison between 'attribute and risk factors of PI' and 'PI and destinations after discharge'.

Patient or public contribution: Patients with CAPI were classified into three clusters and validity of the classification was assessed. Patients who had 'maintained ADL', as well as cognitive status, were expected to be capable of self-care and self-management. Patients with 'low ADL' were characterised by insufficient self-care or home care resulting in having CAPI and would require aged care service. Patients who were at 'very high risk' of having PI were characterised by incurring significant burden on caregivers and need of medical services that prospects terminal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信