Hiroyuki Tokuyasu, Youngwoo Kim, Claudio Vergari, Hiroshi Tada, Chiaki Tanaka, Mitsuru Takemoto
{"title":"髋关节-腰椎活动能力丧失影响腰椎融合术和全髋关节置换术患者的生活质量。","authors":"Hiroyuki Tokuyasu, Youngwoo Kim, Claudio Vergari, Hiroshi Tada, Chiaki Tanaka, Mitsuru Takemoto","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B1.BJJ-2024-0406.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Overall sagittal flexion is restricted in patients who have undergone both lumbar fusion and total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is not evident to what extent this movement is restricted in these patients and how this influences quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which hip-lumbar mobility is decreased in these patients, and how this affects their QoL score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary THA at our hospital between January 2010 and March 2021 were considered (n = 976). Among them, 44 patients who underwent lumbar fusion were included as cases, and 44 THA patients without lumbar disease matched by age, sex, and BMI as Control T. Among those who underwent lumbar fusion, 44 patients without hip abnormalities matched by age, sex, and BMI to the cases were considered as Control F. Outcome and spinopelvic parameters were measured radiologically in extension and flexed-seated positions. Hip, lumbar, and hip-lumbar mobility were calculated as parameter changes between positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20 male and 112 female patients in the case and control groups, with a mean age of 77 years (5 to 94) and a mean BMI of 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (15 to 34). QoL score and hip-lumbar mobility were reduced in cases compared to Control T and F, and were further reduced as the number of fused levels increased. Hip-lumbar mobility was associated with reduction in activity-related QoL, mostly for those activities requiring sagittal flexion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that hip-lumbar mobility is a factor that influences activity, most of all those requiring overall sagittal flexion. Clinicians should focus on hip-lumbar mobility and counteract disability by suggesting appropriate assistive devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 1","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hip-lumbar mobility loss affects quality of life in patients undergoing both lumbar fusion and total hip arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Tokuyasu, Youngwoo Kim, Claudio Vergari, Hiroshi Tada, Chiaki Tanaka, Mitsuru Takemoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B1.BJJ-2024-0406.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Overall sagittal flexion is restricted in patients who have undergone both lumbar fusion and total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is not evident to what extent this movement is restricted in these patients and how this influences quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which hip-lumbar mobility is decreased in these patients, and how this affects their QoL score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary THA at our hospital between January 2010 and March 2021 were considered (n = 976). Among them, 44 patients who underwent lumbar fusion were included as cases, and 44 THA patients without lumbar disease matched by age, sex, and BMI as Control T. Among those who underwent lumbar fusion, 44 patients without hip abnormalities matched by age, sex, and BMI to the cases were considered as Control F. Outcome and spinopelvic parameters were measured radiologically in extension and flexed-seated positions. Hip, lumbar, and hip-lumbar mobility were calculated as parameter changes between positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20 male and 112 female patients in the case and control groups, with a mean age of 77 years (5 to 94) and a mean BMI of 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (15 to 34). QoL score and hip-lumbar mobility were reduced in cases compared to Control T and F, and were further reduced as the number of fused levels increased. Hip-lumbar mobility was associated with reduction in activity-related QoL, mostly for those activities requiring sagittal flexion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that hip-lumbar mobility is a factor that influences activity, most of all those requiring overall sagittal flexion. Clinicians should focus on hip-lumbar mobility and counteract disability by suggesting appropriate assistive devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 1\",\"pages\":\"34-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B1.BJJ-2024-0406.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B1.BJJ-2024-0406.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hip-lumbar mobility loss affects quality of life in patients undergoing both lumbar fusion and total hip arthroplasty.
Aims: Overall sagittal flexion is restricted in patients who have undergone both lumbar fusion and total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is not evident to what extent this movement is restricted in these patients and how this influences quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which hip-lumbar mobility is decreased in these patients, and how this affects their QoL score.
Methods: Patients who underwent primary THA at our hospital between January 2010 and March 2021 were considered (n = 976). Among them, 44 patients who underwent lumbar fusion were included as cases, and 44 THA patients without lumbar disease matched by age, sex, and BMI as Control T. Among those who underwent lumbar fusion, 44 patients without hip abnormalities matched by age, sex, and BMI to the cases were considered as Control F. Outcome and spinopelvic parameters were measured radiologically in extension and flexed-seated positions. Hip, lumbar, and hip-lumbar mobility were calculated as parameter changes between positions.
Results: There were 20 male and 112 female patients in the case and control groups, with a mean age of 77 years (5 to 94) and a mean BMI of 24 kg/m2 (15 to 34). QoL score and hip-lumbar mobility were reduced in cases compared to Control T and F, and were further reduced as the number of fused levels increased. Hip-lumbar mobility was associated with reduction in activity-related QoL, mostly for those activities requiring sagittal flexion.
Conclusion: This study confirmed that hip-lumbar mobility is a factor that influences activity, most of all those requiring overall sagittal flexion. Clinicians should focus on hip-lumbar mobility and counteract disability by suggesting appropriate assistive devices.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.