探索患者观点:深部脑刺激作为轻度认知障碍新治疗方法的结构化访谈研究。

Q1 Neuroscience
Pooja Venkatesh, Bradley Lega, Michael Rubin
{"title":"探索患者观点:深部脑刺激作为轻度认知障碍新治疗方法的结构化访谈研究。","authors":"Pooja Venkatesh, Bradley Lega, Michael Rubin","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2024.2438033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited treatments for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) highlight the need to explore innovations including Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), with patient perspectives key to ethical protocol development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven MCI patients and four care partners were interviewed (Feb 2023-Jan 2024) about daily MCI challenges, desired treatment outcomes, and views on DBS. Thematic analysis following COREQ guidelines identified key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS was a novel concept for all (7/7), and most expressed interest (6/7) despite concerns about invasiveness (6/7) and preference to exhaust medications first (4/7). Care partners (4/4) shared concerns about invasiveness and emphasized proven efficacy. Key deciding factors included the involved procedural risk (6/7), desired significant outcomes (6/7), and prior testing for MCI (7/7). Most participants (6/7) were hesitant to be the first to try DBS, while one was willing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient and care partner insights on DBS for MCI are crucial for balancing innovation with ethical, patient-centered research.</p>","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Patient Perspectives: A Structured Interview Study on Deep Brain Stimulation as a Novel Treatment Approach for Mild Cognitive Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Venkatesh, Bradley Lega, Michael Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507740.2024.2438033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited treatments for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) highlight the need to explore innovations including Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), with patient perspectives key to ethical protocol development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven MCI patients and four care partners were interviewed (Feb 2023-Jan 2024) about daily MCI challenges, desired treatment outcomes, and views on DBS. Thematic analysis following COREQ guidelines identified key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS was a novel concept for all (7/7), and most expressed interest (6/7) despite concerns about invasiveness (6/7) and preference to exhaust medications first (4/7). Care partners (4/4) shared concerns about invasiveness and emphasized proven efficacy. Key deciding factors included the involved procedural risk (6/7), desired significant outcomes (6/7), and prior testing for MCI (7/7). Most participants (6/7) were hesitant to be the first to try DBS, while one was willing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient and care partner insights on DBS for MCI are crucial for balancing innovation with ethical, patient-centered research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2024.2438033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2024.2438033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:轻度认知障碍(MCI)的有限治疗突出了探索创新的必要性,包括深部脑刺激(DBS),患者的观点是伦理方案制定的关键。方法:在2023年2月至2024年1月期间,对7名MCI患者和4名护理伙伴进行了访谈,内容包括日常MCI挑战、期望的治疗结果以及对DBS的看法。根据COREQ指导方针进行主题分析,确定了关键主题。结果:DBS对所有人来说都是一个新颖的概念(7/7),尽管担心侵入性(6/7)和首选先用尽药物(4/7),但大多数人表示感兴趣(6/7)。护理合作伙伴(4/4)分享了对侵入性的担忧,并强调了已证实的疗效。关键决定因素包括所涉及的手术风险(6/7)、期望的显著结果(6/7)和先前的MCI检测(7/7)。大多数参与者(6/7)对第一个尝试DBS犹豫不决,而一个人愿意。结论:患者和护理伙伴对DBS治疗MCI的见解对于平衡创新与道德、以患者为中心的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Patient Perspectives: A Structured Interview Study on Deep Brain Stimulation as a Novel Treatment Approach for Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Introduction: Limited treatments for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) highlight the need to explore innovations including Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), with patient perspectives key to ethical protocol development.

Methods: Seven MCI patients and four care partners were interviewed (Feb 2023-Jan 2024) about daily MCI challenges, desired treatment outcomes, and views on DBS. Thematic analysis following COREQ guidelines identified key themes.

Results: DBS was a novel concept for all (7/7), and most expressed interest (6/7) despite concerns about invasiveness (6/7) and preference to exhaust medications first (4/7). Care partners (4/4) shared concerns about invasiveness and emphasized proven efficacy. Key deciding factors included the involved procedural risk (6/7), desired significant outcomes (6/7), and prior testing for MCI (7/7). Most participants (6/7) were hesitant to be the first to try DBS, while one was willing.

Conclusion: Patient and care partner insights on DBS for MCI are crucial for balancing innovation with ethical, patient-centered research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信