机器学习增强遗传毒性评估使用MultiFlow®DNA损伤分析。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Panuwat Trairatphisan, Lena Dorsheimer, Peter Monecke, Jan Wenzel, Rubin James, Andreas Czich, Yasmin Dietz-Baum, Friedemann Schmidt
{"title":"机器学习增强遗传毒性评估使用MultiFlow®DNA损伤分析。","authors":"Panuwat Trairatphisan, Lena Dorsheimer, Peter Monecke, Jan Wenzel, Rubin James, Andreas Czich, Yasmin Dietz-Baum, Friedemann Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/em.22648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genotoxicity is a critical determinant for assessing the safety of pharmaceutical drugs, their metabolites, and impurities. Among genotoxicity tests, mechanistic assays such as the MultiFlow® DNA damage assay (MFA) allows the investigations on mode of action (MoA) of DNA damage through four mechanistic markers recorded at two time points. Previous studies have shown that machine learning (ML) can enhance precision on classifying the MoA of genotoxicants. Nevertheless, these approaches need to be tailored to specific chemical spaces and lab conditions for accurate risk assessment. In this study, we applied various state-of-the-art ML algorithms available in an open-source R package (caret) to build MFA-ML models using data from Bryce et al. (2016). The best model achieved 95% accuracy on the training dataset and correctly predicted genotoxicity in 16 out of 17 cases in the test dataset. Incorporating molecular descriptors properties from established in silico models demonstrated further improved performance of the approach to cover challenging examples of pharmaceuticals exhibiting a pharmacological mode of action that could interfere with the biomarker response. Further model validation on an external test set with 49 non-overlapped compounds showed a high model accuracy at 92%. Additionally, a tailored graphical user interface was developed using a freely available R package (shiny) to support visual analysis of MFA data including MoA predictions, facilitating broad usage by laboratory scientists. Lastly, a perspective on the integration of MoA predictions as additional evidence into a genotoxicity assessment workflow is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning enhances genotoxicity assessment using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay.\",\"authors\":\"Panuwat Trairatphisan, Lena Dorsheimer, Peter Monecke, Jan Wenzel, Rubin James, Andreas Czich, Yasmin Dietz-Baum, Friedemann Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/em.22648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genotoxicity is a critical determinant for assessing the safety of pharmaceutical drugs, their metabolites, and impurities. Among genotoxicity tests, mechanistic assays such as the MultiFlow® DNA damage assay (MFA) allows the investigations on mode of action (MoA) of DNA damage through four mechanistic markers recorded at two time points. Previous studies have shown that machine learning (ML) can enhance precision on classifying the MoA of genotoxicants. Nevertheless, these approaches need to be tailored to specific chemical spaces and lab conditions for accurate risk assessment. In this study, we applied various state-of-the-art ML algorithms available in an open-source R package (caret) to build MFA-ML models using data from Bryce et al. (2016). The best model achieved 95% accuracy on the training dataset and correctly predicted genotoxicity in 16 out of 17 cases in the test dataset. Incorporating molecular descriptors properties from established in silico models demonstrated further improved performance of the approach to cover challenging examples of pharmaceuticals exhibiting a pharmacological mode of action that could interfere with the biomarker response. Further model validation on an external test set with 49 non-overlapped compounds showed a high model accuracy at 92%. Additionally, a tailored graphical user interface was developed using a freely available R package (shiny) to support visual analysis of MFA data including MoA predictions, facilitating broad usage by laboratory scientists. Lastly, a perspective on the integration of MoA predictions as additional evidence into a genotoxicity assessment workflow is proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遗传毒性是评估药物及其代谢物和杂质安全性的关键决定因素。在遗传毒性测试中,机制分析(如MultiFlow®DNA损伤测定(MFA))允许通过在两个时间点记录的四个机制标记来研究DNA损伤的作用方式(MoA)。已有研究表明,机器学习可以提高基因毒物MoA分类的精度。然而,这些方法需要根据特定的化学空间和实验室条件进行调整,以进行准确的风险评估。在本研究中,我们应用了开源R包(插入符号)中提供的各种最先进的机器学习算法,使用Bryce等人(2016)的数据构建MFA-ML模型。最好的模型在训练数据集中达到95%的准确率,并正确预测了测试数据集中17例中16例的遗传毒性。结合来自已建立的计算机模型的分子描述符特性,进一步证明了该方法的性能改进,以涵盖具有挑战性的药物示例,这些示例显示出可能干扰生物标志物反应的药理作用模式。在包含49种非重叠化合物的外部测试集上进一步验证模型,表明模型准确率高达92%。此外,使用免费的R包(shiny)开发了定制的图形用户界面,以支持MFA数据的可视化分析,包括MoA预测,促进实验室科学家的广泛使用。最后,提出了将MoA预测作为额外证据整合到遗传毒性评估工作流程中的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning enhances genotoxicity assessment using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay.

Genotoxicity is a critical determinant for assessing the safety of pharmaceutical drugs, their metabolites, and impurities. Among genotoxicity tests, mechanistic assays such as the MultiFlow® DNA damage assay (MFA) allows the investigations on mode of action (MoA) of DNA damage through four mechanistic markers recorded at two time points. Previous studies have shown that machine learning (ML) can enhance precision on classifying the MoA of genotoxicants. Nevertheless, these approaches need to be tailored to specific chemical spaces and lab conditions for accurate risk assessment. In this study, we applied various state-of-the-art ML algorithms available in an open-source R package (caret) to build MFA-ML models using data from Bryce et al. (2016). The best model achieved 95% accuracy on the training dataset and correctly predicted genotoxicity in 16 out of 17 cases in the test dataset. Incorporating molecular descriptors properties from established in silico models demonstrated further improved performance of the approach to cover challenging examples of pharmaceuticals exhibiting a pharmacological mode of action that could interfere with the biomarker response. Further model validation on an external test set with 49 non-overlapped compounds showed a high model accuracy at 92%. Additionally, a tailored graphical user interface was developed using a freely available R package (shiny) to support visual analysis of MFA data including MoA predictions, facilitating broad usage by laboratory scientists. Lastly, a perspective on the integration of MoA predictions as additional evidence into a genotoxicity assessment workflow is proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信