多学科团队会议:动态惯例,(重新)姑息治疗。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Erica Borgstrom, Simon Cohn, Annelieke Driessen
{"title":"多学科团队会议:动态惯例,(重新)姑息治疗。","authors":"Erica Borgstrom, Simon Cohn, Annelieke Driessen","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2024.2432881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multidisciplinary team meetings are part of the everyday working life of palliative care staff. Based on ethnographic material from community and hospital palliative care teams in England, this article examines these meetings as dynamic routines. Although intended to have a prescribed format to review deaths and collect standardised information to monitor service performance, in practice, the content and conduct of the meetings were fluid, reflecting how this structure did not always match the concerns held by the team. The meetings provided a means for the team to collectively enact and weigh up different values through distributing the care and responsibility for individual patients across the team; jointly 'feeling their way' to determine what care should be offered and in what form; and by caring for their own professional wellbeing in the context of metric-driven healthcare. We observed how staff experienced tensions in 'documenting care' because of a concern that this misrepresented what they felt were core aspects of their role. Whilst team meetings may be considered a formal, routine part of teamwork and care, we interpret them as a dynamic social practice during which palliative care teams continually question 'what really matters' and (re)make what palliative care practice should entail.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary team meetings: dynamic routines that (re)make palliative care.\",\"authors\":\"Erica Borgstrom, Simon Cohn, Annelieke Driessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14461242.2024.2432881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multidisciplinary team meetings are part of the everyday working life of palliative care staff. Based on ethnographic material from community and hospital palliative care teams in England, this article examines these meetings as dynamic routines. Although intended to have a prescribed format to review deaths and collect standardised information to monitor service performance, in practice, the content and conduct of the meetings were fluid, reflecting how this structure did not always match the concerns held by the team. The meetings provided a means for the team to collectively enact and weigh up different values through distributing the care and responsibility for individual patients across the team; jointly 'feeling their way' to determine what care should be offered and in what form; and by caring for their own professional wellbeing in the context of metric-driven healthcare. We observed how staff experienced tensions in 'documenting care' because of a concern that this misrepresented what they felt were core aspects of their role. Whilst team meetings may be considered a formal, routine part of teamwork and care, we interpret them as a dynamic social practice during which palliative care teams continually question 'what really matters' and (re)make what palliative care practice should entail.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2024.2432881\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2024.2432881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多学科小组会议是姑息治疗工作人员日常工作的一部分。基于英国社区和医院姑息治疗团队的民族志材料,本文将这些会议作为动态惯例进行研究。虽然打算有一种规定的格式来审查死亡和收集标准化信息以监测服务绩效,但实际上,会议的内容和行为是不稳定的,反映出这种结构并不总是与小组所关注的问题相匹配。会议为团队提供了一种手段,通过在团队中分配对单个患者的护理和责任,集体制定和权衡不同的价值观;共同“摸索”确定应提供何种护理和以何种形式提供;在以指标为导向的医疗保健的背景下,关心自己的职业健康。我们观察到员工在“记录护理”中是如何感到紧张的,因为他们担心这会歪曲他们认为自己角色的核心方面。虽然团队会议可能被认为是团队合作和护理的正式、常规部分,但我们将其解读为一种动态的社会实践,在此期间,姑息治疗团队不断质疑“真正重要的是什么”,并(重新)制定姑息治疗实践应该包括什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidisciplinary team meetings: dynamic routines that (re)make palliative care.

Multidisciplinary team meetings are part of the everyday working life of palliative care staff. Based on ethnographic material from community and hospital palliative care teams in England, this article examines these meetings as dynamic routines. Although intended to have a prescribed format to review deaths and collect standardised information to monitor service performance, in practice, the content and conduct of the meetings were fluid, reflecting how this structure did not always match the concerns held by the team. The meetings provided a means for the team to collectively enact and weigh up different values through distributing the care and responsibility for individual patients across the team; jointly 'feeling their way' to determine what care should be offered and in what form; and by caring for their own professional wellbeing in the context of metric-driven healthcare. We observed how staff experienced tensions in 'documenting care' because of a concern that this misrepresented what they felt were core aspects of their role. Whilst team meetings may be considered a formal, routine part of teamwork and care, we interpret them as a dynamic social practice during which palliative care teams continually question 'what really matters' and (re)make what palliative care practice should entail.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信