Haowen Jiang, Ju Le Tan, Wen Ruan, Jin Shing Hon, Aidila Ismail, Chee Lan Lim, Sumathy Perumal, Michelle Koh, Duu Wen Sewa, Ghee Chee Phua, Ying Zi Oh, Sue-Ann Ng, Cassandra Hong, Andrea Low, Soo Teik Lim, Jonathan Yap
{"title":"多种族亚洲人群肺动脉高压患者的风险分层评分表现","authors":"Haowen Jiang, Ju Le Tan, Wen Ruan, Jin Shing Hon, Aidila Ismail, Chee Lan Lim, Sumathy Perumal, Michelle Koh, Duu Wen Sewa, Ghee Chee Phua, Ying Zi Oh, Sue-Ann Ng, Cassandra Hong, Andrea Low, Soo Teik Lim, Jonathan Yap","doi":"10.1002/pul2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guidelines recommend risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients to guide management. There are currently several risk stratification scores available, which have largely been validated in various pulmonary hypertension registries in the West but not in Asia. We aim to study the performance of these different risk scores in PAH patients from a multi-ethnic Asian population. A retrospective review of all PAH patients from Jan 2014 to Jun 2021 from a tertiary cardiac center was performed. Mortality outcomes were obtained from national registries. Using the 2022 ESC/ERS, REVEAL Lite 2.0 and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores, patients were classified into different risk strata at baseline and at follow-up and changes in any risk strata recorded. The prognosis of patients based on these factors was compared. A total of 153 patients (mean age: 57 ± 17 years; 117 women; 94 Chinese, 33 Malay, 19 Indian) were included. All three scores showed significant difference in mortality outcomes between the different risk strata both at baseline and at follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with the highest risk group showing the highest mortality. Patients who worsened to or remained at intermediate/high-risk generally had a worse prognosis than those who remained stable at or improved to low-risk strata. The 2022 ESC/ERS and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores had C-statistics of 0.73 (0.58-0.88) and 0.80 (0.72-0.88), respectively, for predicting 1-year mortality. Serial risk stratification is a useful tool in prognosticating Asian PAH patients and may play an important role in guiding therapeutic management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":"15 1","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Risk-Stratification Scores for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Haowen Jiang, Ju Le Tan, Wen Ruan, Jin Shing Hon, Aidila Ismail, Chee Lan Lim, Sumathy Perumal, Michelle Koh, Duu Wen Sewa, Ghee Chee Phua, Ying Zi Oh, Sue-Ann Ng, Cassandra Hong, Andrea Low, Soo Teik Lim, Jonathan Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pul2.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Guidelines recommend risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients to guide management. There are currently several risk stratification scores available, which have largely been validated in various pulmonary hypertension registries in the West but not in Asia. We aim to study the performance of these different risk scores in PAH patients from a multi-ethnic Asian population. A retrospective review of all PAH patients from Jan 2014 to Jun 2021 from a tertiary cardiac center was performed. Mortality outcomes were obtained from national registries. Using the 2022 ESC/ERS, REVEAL Lite 2.0 and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores, patients were classified into different risk strata at baseline and at follow-up and changes in any risk strata recorded. The prognosis of patients based on these factors was compared. A total of 153 patients (mean age: 57 ± 17 years; 117 women; 94 Chinese, 33 Malay, 19 Indian) were included. All three scores showed significant difference in mortality outcomes between the different risk strata both at baseline and at follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with the highest risk group showing the highest mortality. Patients who worsened to or remained at intermediate/high-risk generally had a worse prognosis than those who remained stable at or improved to low-risk strata. The 2022 ESC/ERS and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores had C-statistics of 0.73 (0.58-0.88) and 0.80 (0.72-0.88), respectively, for predicting 1-year mortality. Serial risk stratification is a useful tool in prognosticating Asian PAH patients and may play an important role in guiding therapeutic management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e70032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
指南推荐肺动脉高压(PAH)患者的风险分层来指导管理。目前有几种可用的风险分层评分,这些评分在西方的各种肺动脉高压登记处得到了很大程度的验证,但在亚洲尚未得到验证。我们的目的是研究这些不同的风险评分在多种族亚洲人群PAH患者中的表现。回顾性分析2014年1月至2021年6月来自三级心脏中心的所有PAH患者。死亡率结果从国家登记处获得。使用2022 ESC/ERS、REVEAL Lite 2.0和COMPERA 2.0风险评分,在基线和随访时将患者分为不同的风险层,并记录任何风险层的变化。比较这些因素对患者预后的影响。153例患者(平均年龄:57±17岁;117名女性;包括94名华人,33名马来人,19名印度人。在基线和随访时,所有三个得分均显示不同风险层之间的死亡率结果有显著差异
Performance of Risk-Stratification Scores for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population.
Guidelines recommend risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients to guide management. There are currently several risk stratification scores available, which have largely been validated in various pulmonary hypertension registries in the West but not in Asia. We aim to study the performance of these different risk scores in PAH patients from a multi-ethnic Asian population. A retrospective review of all PAH patients from Jan 2014 to Jun 2021 from a tertiary cardiac center was performed. Mortality outcomes were obtained from national registries. Using the 2022 ESC/ERS, REVEAL Lite 2.0 and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores, patients were classified into different risk strata at baseline and at follow-up and changes in any risk strata recorded. The prognosis of patients based on these factors was compared. A total of 153 patients (mean age: 57 ± 17 years; 117 women; 94 Chinese, 33 Malay, 19 Indian) were included. All three scores showed significant difference in mortality outcomes between the different risk strata both at baseline and at follow-up (p < 0.05), with the highest risk group showing the highest mortality. Patients who worsened to or remained at intermediate/high-risk generally had a worse prognosis than those who remained stable at or improved to low-risk strata. The 2022 ESC/ERS and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores had C-statistics of 0.73 (0.58-0.88) and 0.80 (0.72-0.88), respectively, for predicting 1-year mortality. Serial risk stratification is a useful tool in prognosticating Asian PAH patients and may play an important role in guiding therapeutic management.
期刊介绍:
Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.