痴呆症的沟通能力分析:一种新的认知-沟通评估工具的验证。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Suzanna Dooley, Tammy Hopper, Rachael Doyle, Orla Gilheaney, Margaret Walshe
{"title":"痴呆症的沟通能力分析:一种新的认知-沟通评估工具的验证。","authors":"Suzanna Dooley, Tammy Hopper, Rachael Doyle, Orla Gilheaney, Margaret Walshe","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with dementia have communication limitations resulting from cognitive impairments that define the syndrome. Whereas there are numerous cognitive assessments for individuals with dementia, there are far fewer communication assessments. The Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD) was developed to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity, longitudinal validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the P-CAD in a population of people with dementia and their communication partners.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The P-CAD was administered to 122 people with dementia and their communication partners in Ireland (n = 100) and Canada (n = 22), over a 12-month period. To establish concurrent validity of the P-CAD, scores were compared to scores obtained from existing standardized instruments including the Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-2) and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Inter-rater reliability and responsiveness (longitudinal validity) were analysed using data from a subgroup of participants.</p><p><strong>Outcomes & results: </strong>Overall P-CAD test scores were significantly correlated with FLCI (n = 122; r = 0.875; p < 0.001) and MMSE-2 total scores (n = 122; r = 0.857; p < 0.001). Levels of communication support categories on the P-CAD correlated with GDS rankings (n = 122; rho = -0.539; p < 0.001) and MMSE-2 total scores (n = 122; rho = 0.680, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability tested for 20 participants in the Irish sample revealed high levels of agreement between raters in scoring the GDS (n = 20; ICC = 0.969, p < 0.001), MMSE-2 (n = 20; ICC = 0.997, p < 0.001), FLCI (n = 20; ICC = 0.999, p < 0.001) and P-CAD (n = 20; ICC = 0.981, p < 0.001). To establish longitudinal validity to examine if the P-CAD was responsive to changes in cognitive-communication function over time, 12 participants in the Irish sample repeated all tests 3 months after the initial testing. No statistically significant differences in test scores were found for the 12 participants who completed follow-up measures at this time point in any of the three scales. It was not possible to determine sufficient responsiveness as correlations between the change in P-CAD scores over 3 months were insignificant for both the change in MMSE-2 scores (rho = -0.130, p = 0.704) and the FLCI scores (rho = 0.221, p = 0.513).</p><p><strong>Conclusions & implications: </strong>In this study, P-CAD has demonstrated good concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability in samples collected in two countries with English-speaking participants. The P-CAD is appropriate for use to evaluate communication abilities of people with dementia, including during conversational interactions with caregivers.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>What is already known on the subject Dementia alters the communication function of the person with dementia and impacts interactions with others. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) provide specific recommendations on communication function and support. However, they have limited access to comprehensive communication assessments to guide intervention. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This validation study has confirmed that Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD) is a valid and reliable tool for SLTs to profile the communication abilities of people with dementia. It identifies the type and levels of communication support required as dementia progresses. The inclusion of communication partners in the study confirms their important role in providing conversation support to people with dementia. What are the potential or clinical implications of this work? The P-CAD is a clinical resource for dynamic communication assessment, which identifies key areas of retained ability to guide communication support and individualised intervention. It can be used with people at different stages and severity of dementia across a range of clinical settings. The P-CAD summary, which is part of the P-CAD, can be shared with family members and healthcare teams to enhance communication access for the person as dementia progresses.</p>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 1","pages":"e13153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia: Validation of a new cognitive-communication assessment tool.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanna Dooley, Tammy Hopper, Rachael Doyle, Orla Gilheaney, Margaret Walshe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.13153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with dementia have communication limitations resulting from cognitive impairments that define the syndrome. Whereas there are numerous cognitive assessments for individuals with dementia, there are far fewer communication assessments. The Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD) was developed to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity, longitudinal validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the P-CAD in a population of people with dementia and their communication partners.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The P-CAD was administered to 122 people with dementia and their communication partners in Ireland (n = 100) and Canada (n = 22), over a 12-month period. To establish concurrent validity of the P-CAD, scores were compared to scores obtained from existing standardized instruments including the Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-2) and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Inter-rater reliability and responsiveness (longitudinal validity) were analysed using data from a subgroup of participants.</p><p><strong>Outcomes & results: </strong>Overall P-CAD test scores were significantly correlated with FLCI (n = 122; r = 0.875; p < 0.001) and MMSE-2 total scores (n = 122; r = 0.857; p < 0.001). Levels of communication support categories on the P-CAD correlated with GDS rankings (n = 122; rho = -0.539; p < 0.001) and MMSE-2 total scores (n = 122; rho = 0.680, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability tested for 20 participants in the Irish sample revealed high levels of agreement between raters in scoring the GDS (n = 20; ICC = 0.969, p < 0.001), MMSE-2 (n = 20; ICC = 0.997, p < 0.001), FLCI (n = 20; ICC = 0.999, p < 0.001) and P-CAD (n = 20; ICC = 0.981, p < 0.001). To establish longitudinal validity to examine if the P-CAD was responsive to changes in cognitive-communication function over time, 12 participants in the Irish sample repeated all tests 3 months after the initial testing. No statistically significant differences in test scores were found for the 12 participants who completed follow-up measures at this time point in any of the three scales. It was not possible to determine sufficient responsiveness as correlations between the change in P-CAD scores over 3 months were insignificant for both the change in MMSE-2 scores (rho = -0.130, p = 0.704) and the FLCI scores (rho = 0.221, p = 0.513).</p><p><strong>Conclusions & implications: </strong>In this study, P-CAD has demonstrated good concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability in samples collected in two countries with English-speaking participants. The P-CAD is appropriate for use to evaluate communication abilities of people with dementia, including during conversational interactions with caregivers.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>What is already known on the subject Dementia alters the communication function of the person with dementia and impacts interactions with others. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) provide specific recommendations on communication function and support. However, they have limited access to comprehensive communication assessments to guide intervention. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This validation study has confirmed that Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD) is a valid and reliable tool for SLTs to profile the communication abilities of people with dementia. It identifies the type and levels of communication support required as dementia progresses. The inclusion of communication partners in the study confirms their important role in providing conversation support to people with dementia. What are the potential or clinical implications of this work? The P-CAD is a clinical resource for dynamic communication assessment, which identifies key areas of retained ability to guide communication support and individualised intervention. It can be used with people at different stages and severity of dementia across a range of clinical settings. The P-CAD summary, which is part of the P-CAD, can be shared with family members and healthcare teams to enhance communication access for the person as dementia progresses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"e13153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13153\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痴呆症患者由于认知障碍导致交流受限。尽管针对痴呆症患者的认知评估有很多,但沟通评估却少得多。痴呆症沟通能力分析(P-CAD)的开发就是为了解决这一差距。目的:本研究的目的是检验P-CAD在痴呆患者及其交往伙伴群体中的并发效度、纵向效度、间效度和内效度。方法:在12个月的时间里,对爱尔兰(n = 100)和加拿大(n = 22)的122名痴呆症患者及其交流伙伴进行P-CAD治疗。为了确定P-CAD的并发效度,将得分与现有标准化工具的得分进行比较,包括功能性语言交际量表(FLCI),迷你精神状态检查(MMSE-2)和整体恶化量表(GDS)。评估者间的信度和反应性(纵向效度)使用来自参与者亚组的数据进行分析。结果与结果:P-CAD总分与FLCI显著相关(n = 122;r = 0.875;结论和意义:在本研究中,p - cad在两个国家的英语参与者中显示出良好的并发效度和间信度。P-CAD适用于评估痴呆症患者的沟通能力,包括与护理人员的对话互动。这篇论文补充的内容:关于痴呆症这一主题的已知内容改变了痴呆症患者的沟通功能,并影响了与他人的互动。言语和语言治疗师(slt)提供关于沟通功能和支持的具体建议。然而,他们获得指导干预的全面沟通评估的机会有限。本验证性研究证实了痴呆症沟通能力分析(P-CAD)是SLTs分析痴呆症患者沟通能力的有效和可靠的工具。它确定了痴呆症进展过程中所需的沟通支持的类型和水平。将交流伙伴纳入研究证实了他们在为痴呆症患者提供对话支持方面的重要作用。这项工作的潜在或临床意义是什么?P-CAD是一种动态沟通评估的临床资源,它确定了指导沟通支持和个性化干预的保留能力的关键领域。它可以在一系列临床环境中用于不同阶段和不同严重程度的痴呆症患者。P-CAD摘要是P-CAD的一部分,可以与家庭成员和医疗团队共享,以便在痴呆症进展时加强与患者的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia: Validation of a new cognitive-communication assessment tool.

Background: Individuals with dementia have communication limitations resulting from cognitive impairments that define the syndrome. Whereas there are numerous cognitive assessments for individuals with dementia, there are far fewer communication assessments. The Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD) was developed to address this gap.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity, longitudinal validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the P-CAD in a population of people with dementia and their communication partners.

Method: The P-CAD was administered to 122 people with dementia and their communication partners in Ireland (n = 100) and Canada (n = 22), over a 12-month period. To establish concurrent validity of the P-CAD, scores were compared to scores obtained from existing standardized instruments including the Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-2) and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Inter-rater reliability and responsiveness (longitudinal validity) were analysed using data from a subgroup of participants.

Outcomes & results: Overall P-CAD test scores were significantly correlated with FLCI (n = 122; r = 0.875; p < 0.001) and MMSE-2 total scores (n = 122; r = 0.857; p < 0.001). Levels of communication support categories on the P-CAD correlated with GDS rankings (n = 122; rho = -0.539; p < 0.001) and MMSE-2 total scores (n = 122; rho = 0.680, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability tested for 20 participants in the Irish sample revealed high levels of agreement between raters in scoring the GDS (n = 20; ICC = 0.969, p < 0.001), MMSE-2 (n = 20; ICC = 0.997, p < 0.001), FLCI (n = 20; ICC = 0.999, p < 0.001) and P-CAD (n = 20; ICC = 0.981, p < 0.001). To establish longitudinal validity to examine if the P-CAD was responsive to changes in cognitive-communication function over time, 12 participants in the Irish sample repeated all tests 3 months after the initial testing. No statistically significant differences in test scores were found for the 12 participants who completed follow-up measures at this time point in any of the three scales. It was not possible to determine sufficient responsiveness as correlations between the change in P-CAD scores over 3 months were insignificant for both the change in MMSE-2 scores (rho = -0.130, p = 0.704) and the FLCI scores (rho = 0.221, p = 0.513).

Conclusions & implications: In this study, P-CAD has demonstrated good concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability in samples collected in two countries with English-speaking participants. The P-CAD is appropriate for use to evaluate communication abilities of people with dementia, including during conversational interactions with caregivers.

What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject Dementia alters the communication function of the person with dementia and impacts interactions with others. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) provide specific recommendations on communication function and support. However, they have limited access to comprehensive communication assessments to guide intervention. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This validation study has confirmed that Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD) is a valid and reliable tool for SLTs to profile the communication abilities of people with dementia. It identifies the type and levels of communication support required as dementia progresses. The inclusion of communication partners in the study confirms their important role in providing conversation support to people with dementia. What are the potential or clinical implications of this work? The P-CAD is a clinical resource for dynamic communication assessment, which identifies key areas of retained ability to guide communication support and individualised intervention. It can be used with people at different stages and severity of dementia across a range of clinical settings. The P-CAD summary, which is part of the P-CAD, can be shared with family members and healthcare teams to enhance communication access for the person as dementia progresses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信