荷兰急诊科阿片类药物处方指南的有限使用:一项全国性调查的结果。

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nicole Kraaijvanger, Cees Kramers, Albert Dahan, Arnt F A Schellekens
{"title":"荷兰急诊科阿片类药物处方指南的有限使用:一项全国性调查的结果。","authors":"Nicole Kraaijvanger, Cees Kramers, Albert Dahan, Arnt F A Schellekens","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00799-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the Netherlands has experienced a notable increase in opioid prescriptions and associated fatalities. Emergency department (ED) patients exhibit relatively high rates of opioid use (15%) and misuse (23% of patients who present to the ED and use prescription opioids test positive for misuse). To mitigate opioid-related harm, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) advocates for the use of non-opioid analgesics and minimal opioid prescriptions. In the Netherlands, the Society for Anesthesiology has issued a guideline for appropriate opioid use, which are also relevant to EDs. However, the extent of implementation in EDs remains unclear. This study utilized an online survey to assess the implementation of opioid-prescribing guidelines in Dutch EDs. Chief medical officers from various EDs across the Netherlands were invited via email to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires gathered general information about the EDs, details on the application of opioid-prescribing guidelines, management of problematic opioid use, and specifics of the guidelines in practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed by chief medical officers from 33 Dutch EDs, yielding a 52.4% response rate. Nineteen EDs (57.6%) used guidelines for opioid prescribing, predominantly local protocols, with only two of them (10.5%) using the national guideline. The guidelines varied in content, with 68.4% advising on specific opioids (mainly preferring oxycodone) and dosage, and in 63.2% giving advice on prescription duration (typically 3-7 days). Patient education with opioid prescriptions was specified in the guidelines at 57.9% (11/19) of EDs, with brochures provided at 17.6% (6/19) of EDs. The primary focus of patient education was on adverse effects, with addiction risks mentioned at 36.4% (4/11) EDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals significant variability and gaps in opioid prescribing guidelines across Dutch EDs. Compared to US guidelines, Dutch practices are less cautious, highlighting the need for improvement. This study underscores the necessity for a Dutch guideline tailored for EDs to manage opioid prescriptions and problematic opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited use of opioid prescribing guidelines in Dutch emergency departments: results of a nationwide survey.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Kraaijvanger, Cees Kramers, Albert Dahan, Arnt F A Schellekens\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12245-024-00799-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the Netherlands has experienced a notable increase in opioid prescriptions and associated fatalities. Emergency department (ED) patients exhibit relatively high rates of opioid use (15%) and misuse (23% of patients who present to the ED and use prescription opioids test positive for misuse). To mitigate opioid-related harm, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) advocates for the use of non-opioid analgesics and minimal opioid prescriptions. In the Netherlands, the Society for Anesthesiology has issued a guideline for appropriate opioid use, which are also relevant to EDs. However, the extent of implementation in EDs remains unclear. This study utilized an online survey to assess the implementation of opioid-prescribing guidelines in Dutch EDs. Chief medical officers from various EDs across the Netherlands were invited via email to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires gathered general information about the EDs, details on the application of opioid-prescribing guidelines, management of problematic opioid use, and specifics of the guidelines in practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed by chief medical officers from 33 Dutch EDs, yielding a 52.4% response rate. Nineteen EDs (57.6%) used guidelines for opioid prescribing, predominantly local protocols, with only two of them (10.5%) using the national guideline. The guidelines varied in content, with 68.4% advising on specific opioids (mainly preferring oxycodone) and dosage, and in 63.2% giving advice on prescription duration (typically 3-7 days). Patient education with opioid prescriptions was specified in the guidelines at 57.9% (11/19) of EDs, with brochures provided at 17.6% (6/19) of EDs. The primary focus of patient education was on adverse effects, with addiction risks mentioned at 36.4% (4/11) EDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals significant variability and gaps in opioid prescribing guidelines across Dutch EDs. Compared to US guidelines, Dutch practices are less cautious, highlighting the need for improvement. This study underscores the necessity for a Dutch guideline tailored for EDs to manage opioid prescriptions and problematic opioid use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00799-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00799-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,荷兰的阿片类药物处方和相关死亡人数显著增加。急诊科(ED)患者使用阿片类药物(15%)和滥用阿片类药物的比例相对较高(到急诊科就诊并使用处方阿片类药物的患者中,23%的患者检测呈滥用阳性)。为了减轻阿片类药物相关的危害,美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)提倡使用非阿片类镇痛药和尽量减少阿片类药物处方。在荷兰,麻醉学学会发布了阿片类药物适当使用的指南,这也与急诊科有关。然而,ed的实施程度仍不清楚。本研究利用在线调查来评估阿片类药物处方指南在荷兰急诊室的实施情况。通过电子邮件邀请荷兰各急诊科的首席医疗官填写调查问卷。这些问卷收集了关于急诊科的一般信息、阿片类药物处方指南应用的细节、阿片类药物使用问题的管理以及指南在实践中的具体情况。结果:荷兰33家急诊科的首席医务官完成了问卷调查,回复率为52.4%。19家急诊室(57.6%)使用阿片类药物处方指南,主要是地方方案,其中只有两家(10.5%)使用国家指南。指南内容各不相同,68.4%的指南建议使用特定的阿片类药物(主要是羟可酮)和剂量,63.2%的指南建议使用处方时间(通常为3-7天)。57.9%(11/19)的急诊科在指南中规定了对患者进行阿片类药物处方教育,17.6%(6/19)的急诊科提供了小册子。患者教育的主要重点是不良反应,有36.4%(4/11)的ed提到了成瘾风险。结论:这项研究揭示了荷兰急诊室阿片类药物处方指南的显著差异和差距。与美国的指导方针相比,荷兰的做法不那么谨慎,突显出需要改进。这项研究强调了为ed量身定制的荷兰指南的必要性,以管理阿片类药物处方和有问题的阿片类药物使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited use of opioid prescribing guidelines in Dutch emergency departments: results of a nationwide survey.

Background: In recent years, the Netherlands has experienced a notable increase in opioid prescriptions and associated fatalities. Emergency department (ED) patients exhibit relatively high rates of opioid use (15%) and misuse (23% of patients who present to the ED and use prescription opioids test positive for misuse). To mitigate opioid-related harm, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) advocates for the use of non-opioid analgesics and minimal opioid prescriptions. In the Netherlands, the Society for Anesthesiology has issued a guideline for appropriate opioid use, which are also relevant to EDs. However, the extent of implementation in EDs remains unclear. This study utilized an online survey to assess the implementation of opioid-prescribing guidelines in Dutch EDs. Chief medical officers from various EDs across the Netherlands were invited via email to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires gathered general information about the EDs, details on the application of opioid-prescribing guidelines, management of problematic opioid use, and specifics of the guidelines in practice.

Results: Questionnaires were completed by chief medical officers from 33 Dutch EDs, yielding a 52.4% response rate. Nineteen EDs (57.6%) used guidelines for opioid prescribing, predominantly local protocols, with only two of them (10.5%) using the national guideline. The guidelines varied in content, with 68.4% advising on specific opioids (mainly preferring oxycodone) and dosage, and in 63.2% giving advice on prescription duration (typically 3-7 days). Patient education with opioid prescriptions was specified in the guidelines at 57.9% (11/19) of EDs, with brochures provided at 17.6% (6/19) of EDs. The primary focus of patient education was on adverse effects, with addiction risks mentioned at 36.4% (4/11) EDs.

Conclusions: This study reveals significant variability and gaps in opioid prescribing guidelines across Dutch EDs. Compared to US guidelines, Dutch practices are less cautious, highlighting the need for improvement. This study underscores the necessity for a Dutch guideline tailored for EDs to manage opioid prescriptions and problematic opioid use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信