Jennifer H Lee, Ciara Sanchez, Bria Johnson, Katherine L Woodburn, Cheryl B Iglesia
{"title":"失踪的历史:安那那、贝齐和露西在妇科教科书中的遗产。","authors":"Jennifer H Lee, Ciara Sanchez, Bria Johnson, Katherine L Woodburn, Cheryl B Iglesia","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The legacy of J. Marion Sims as the \"father of gynecology\" has become widely controversial among medical professionals and lay public because of ethical concerns surrounding the development of his surgical techniques and his exploitation of enslaved women for his experiments. Notably, in April 2018, the City of New York relocated a commemorative statue of Sims from Central Park following an art commission's investigation of his controversial practices. The relocation was viewed by many as a public acknowledgement of the contributions of Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the other enslaved women to the advancement of gynecologic surgery. However, despite the increased public awareness of the women's sacrifices in recent years medical literature has not kept pace. We compared the portrayal of Sims and these enslaved women within current gynecology textbooks, prior editions, and historical medical literature. We found that gynecologic textbooks more often mention J. Marion Sims by name (74%) compared to the enslaved women he experimented on (24%). Neither current gynecologic surgery textbooks nor primary historical sources contain significant references to these women, meaning much of their story has been lost to history. While there has been increased public knowledge of the sacrifices of Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy and other enslaved women, lay recognition is not enough. Full acknowledgment of their contributions necessitates crediting their roles in Sims' experiments and stating their names in medical literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missing History: Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy's Legacy in Gynecologic Textbooks.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer H Lee, Ciara Sanchez, Bria Johnson, Katherine L Woodburn, Cheryl B Iglesia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The legacy of J. Marion Sims as the \\\"father of gynecology\\\" has become widely controversial among medical professionals and lay public because of ethical concerns surrounding the development of his surgical techniques and his exploitation of enslaved women for his experiments. Notably, in April 2018, the City of New York relocated a commemorative statue of Sims from Central Park following an art commission's investigation of his controversial practices. The relocation was viewed by many as a public acknowledgement of the contributions of Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the other enslaved women to the advancement of gynecologic surgery. However, despite the increased public awareness of the women's sacrifices in recent years medical literature has not kept pace. We compared the portrayal of Sims and these enslaved women within current gynecology textbooks, prior editions, and historical medical literature. We found that gynecologic textbooks more often mention J. Marion Sims by name (74%) compared to the enslaved women he experimented on (24%). Neither current gynecologic surgery textbooks nor primary historical sources contain significant references to these women, meaning much of their story has been lost to history. While there has been increased public knowledge of the sacrifices of Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy and other enslaved women, lay recognition is not enough. Full acknowledgment of their contributions necessitates crediting their roles in Sims' experiments and stating their names in medical literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:J. Marion Sims作为“妇科之父”的遗产在医学专业人士和普通公众中引起了广泛的争议,因为他的外科技术的发展以及他在实验中剥削奴役妇女的伦理问题。值得注意的是,2018年4月,在一个艺术委员会对西姆斯有争议的做法进行调查后,纽约市从中央公园搬迁了西姆斯的纪念雕像。这次搬迁被许多人视为对安那加、贝齐、露西和其他被奴役妇女对妇科外科进步所做贡献的公开承认。然而,尽管近年来公众对妇女牺牲的认识有所提高,但医学文献并没有跟上。我们比较了目前的妇科教科书、以前的版本和历史医学文献中对西姆斯和这些被奴役妇女的描述。我们发现妇科教科书更经常提到J. Marion Sims的名字(74%),而不是他实验的被奴役妇女(24%)。目前的妇科外科教科书和主要的历史资料都没有包含这些妇女的重要参考资料,这意味着她们的大部分故事已经消失在历史中。虽然公众对安那加、贝齐、露西和其他被奴役妇女的牺牲的了解越来越多,但外行的认识还不够。要充分承认他们的贡献,就必须把他们在西姆斯实验中的作用归功于他们,并在医学文献中注明他们的名字。
Missing History: Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy's Legacy in Gynecologic Textbooks.
Abstract: The legacy of J. Marion Sims as the "father of gynecology" has become widely controversial among medical professionals and lay public because of ethical concerns surrounding the development of his surgical techniques and his exploitation of enslaved women for his experiments. Notably, in April 2018, the City of New York relocated a commemorative statue of Sims from Central Park following an art commission's investigation of his controversial practices. The relocation was viewed by many as a public acknowledgement of the contributions of Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the other enslaved women to the advancement of gynecologic surgery. However, despite the increased public awareness of the women's sacrifices in recent years medical literature has not kept pace. We compared the portrayal of Sims and these enslaved women within current gynecology textbooks, prior editions, and historical medical literature. We found that gynecologic textbooks more often mention J. Marion Sims by name (74%) compared to the enslaved women he experimented on (24%). Neither current gynecologic surgery textbooks nor primary historical sources contain significant references to these women, meaning much of their story has been lost to history. While there has been increased public knowledge of the sacrifices of Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy and other enslaved women, lay recognition is not enough. Full acknowledgment of their contributions necessitates crediting their roles in Sims' experiments and stating their names in medical literature.