机器人根治性前列腺切除术后超大尺寸前列腺的功能和肿瘤结果:倾向评分匹配分析

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Prostate Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1002/pros.24848
Ahmed Gamal, Marcio C Moschovas, Abdel R Jaber, Shady Saikali, Sumeet Reddy, Avaneesh Kunta, Marco Sandri, Travis Rogers, Vipul Patel
{"title":"机器人根治性前列腺切除术后超大尺寸前列腺的功能和肿瘤结果:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Ahmed Gamal, Marcio C Moschovas, Abdel R Jaber, Shady Saikali, Sumeet Reddy, Avaneesh Kunta, Marco Sandri, Travis Rogers, Vipul Patel","doi":"10.1002/pros.24848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used as the main surgical approach to treat prostate cancer in the United States. Prostate size is often described as a factor affecting the outcomes of RARP as shown by many studies. However, these studies are limited to a small number of patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the functional and oncologic outcomes of RARP in very large prostate sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and seventy-five RARP patients were divided into two groups according to prostate size: Group 1 had prostates larger than 150 g and Group 2 smaller than 50 g. Perioperative variables were matched with propensity score matching 1:3 and postoperative variables were analyzed for significant differences in outcomes between groups. Variables analyzed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, pathological staging, positive surgical margins (PSM) rates, biochemical recurrence (BCR), potency, and continence rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups exhibited similar preoperative characteristics. Patients with larger prostates (Group 1) were more likely to have higher blood loss (EBL), longer console time, and more days with catheter. However, we could not find significant difference in the overall postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo). Pathological outcomes were also statistically different as patients with larger prostates had (69.7%) more pT2 disease and (12.1%) lower rates of PSM. Finally, we could not find significant difference in the functional outcomes between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate that prostate size impacts multiple outcomes. Larger prostates had lower-grade disease, reduced EPE and PSM rates, with no significant differences in BCR or functional outcomes. Perioperative differences, such as increased blood loss and console time, were also observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"e24848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Very Large Prostate Sizes Post Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Gamal, Marcio C Moschovas, Abdel R Jaber, Shady Saikali, Sumeet Reddy, Avaneesh Kunta, Marco Sandri, Travis Rogers, Vipul Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.24848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used as the main surgical approach to treat prostate cancer in the United States. Prostate size is often described as a factor affecting the outcomes of RARP as shown by many studies. However, these studies are limited to a small number of patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the functional and oncologic outcomes of RARP in very large prostate sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and seventy-five RARP patients were divided into two groups according to prostate size: Group 1 had prostates larger than 150 g and Group 2 smaller than 50 g. Perioperative variables were matched with propensity score matching 1:3 and postoperative variables were analyzed for significant differences in outcomes between groups. Variables analyzed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, pathological staging, positive surgical margins (PSM) rates, biochemical recurrence (BCR), potency, and continence rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups exhibited similar preoperative characteristics. Patients with larger prostates (Group 1) were more likely to have higher blood loss (EBL), longer console time, and more days with catheter. However, we could not find significant difference in the overall postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo). Pathological outcomes were also statistically different as patients with larger prostates had (69.7%) more pT2 disease and (12.1%) lower rates of PSM. Finally, we could not find significant difference in the functional outcomes between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate that prostate size impacts multiple outcomes. Larger prostates had lower-grade disease, reduced EPE and PSM rates, with no significant differences in BCR or functional outcomes. Perioperative differences, such as increased blood loss and console time, were also observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e24848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24848\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)在美国被广泛应用为治疗前列腺癌的主要手术方式。许多研究表明,前列腺大小通常被描述为影响RARP结果的一个因素。然而,这些研究仅限于少数患者。目的:评价大前列腺癌RARP的功能及肿瘤预后。方法:375例RARP患者按前列腺大小分为两组:1组前列腺≥150g, 2组前列腺小于50g。围手术期变量与倾向评分匹配1:3进行匹配,术后变量分析各组结果是否存在显著差异。分析的变量包括估计失血量(EBL)、手术时间、导管时间、住院时间、术后并发症、病理分期、手术边缘阳性(PSM)率、生化复发率(BCR)、药力和失禁率。结果:两组患者术前特征相似。前列腺较大的患者(第一组)更有可能出现更高的出血量(EBL),更长的缓解时间和更长的导管使用时间。然而,我们没有发现总体术后并发症的显著差异(Clavien-Dindo)。病理结果也有统计学差异,前列腺较大的患者pT2疾病发生率(69.7%)更高,PSM发生率(12.1%)更低。最后,我们没有发现两组之间的功能结局有显著差异。结论:前列腺大小影响多种预后。较大前列腺的疾病级别较低,EPE和PSM发生率降低,BCR或功能结局无显著差异。围手术期差异,如出血量增加和控制时间,也被观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Very Large Prostate Sizes Post Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Background: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used as the main surgical approach to treat prostate cancer in the United States. Prostate size is often described as a factor affecting the outcomes of RARP as shown by many studies. However, these studies are limited to a small number of patients.

Objective: To evaluate the functional and oncologic outcomes of RARP in very large prostate sizes.

Methods: Three hundred and seventy-five RARP patients were divided into two groups according to prostate size: Group 1 had prostates larger than 150 g and Group 2 smaller than 50 g. Perioperative variables were matched with propensity score matching 1:3 and postoperative variables were analyzed for significant differences in outcomes between groups. Variables analyzed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, pathological staging, positive surgical margins (PSM) rates, biochemical recurrence (BCR), potency, and continence rates.

Results: The two groups exhibited similar preoperative characteristics. Patients with larger prostates (Group 1) were more likely to have higher blood loss (EBL), longer console time, and more days with catheter. However, we could not find significant difference in the overall postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo). Pathological outcomes were also statistically different as patients with larger prostates had (69.7%) more pT2 disease and (12.1%) lower rates of PSM. Finally, we could not find significant difference in the functional outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion: The results demonstrate that prostate size impacts multiple outcomes. Larger prostates had lower-grade disease, reduced EPE and PSM rates, with no significant differences in BCR or functional outcomes. Perioperative differences, such as increased blood loss and console time, were also observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信