使用合成吸湿扩张器进行宫颈成熟前诱导对剖腹产妇女产妇预后的影响:单组临床试验

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jp/8835464
Gowri Dorairajan, Saranya Ravi, Palanivel Chinnakili
{"title":"使用合成吸湿扩张器进行宫颈成熟前诱导对剖腹产妇女产妇预后的影响:单组临床试验","authors":"Gowri Dorairajan, Saranya Ravi, Palanivel Chinnakili","doi":"10.1155/jp/8835464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Preinduction cervical ripening in previous caesarean pregnancy is limited to intracervical Foley catheter. This study is aimed at finding the vaginal birth rates, improvement of Bishop score, and safety of osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S) among women with previous caesarean pregnancy. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted this single-group clinical study after the approval of the institute ethics committee, clinical trial registration, and obtaining informed consent. We recruited women above 18 years with a prior caesarean section at term and a Bishop score of less than 6 by systematic random sampling prospectively. The first or second author inserted two to a maximum of five osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) in the cervical canal. After 24 h, we removed Dilapan and induced labour with a low-dose oxytocin regimen up to a maximum dose of 24 mIU/min. We assessed the improvement of the Bishop score and vaginal birth rates for efficacy and safety concerns like bleeding, fragmentation, displacement, infections, and scar dehiscence. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-two women completed the study. The Bishop score significantly improved from a mean of 2.6 before to 5.3 after Dilapan. Three opted for a caesarean section after Dilapan removal and refused oxytocin infusion. Seventy-nine women completed the trial of labour. Forty-one (52%) achieved active labour (52%). Twenty-seven delivered vaginally, and 52 required emergency caesarean section (34% vaginal birth rate; 18 spontaneous, nine instrumental, four with forceps, and five with vacuum). None had entrapment, fragmentation, or upward displacement of Dilapan. Two women had scar dehiscence, and one had a traumatic postpartum haemorrhage. There was no maternal or perinatal mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> We conclude that the hygroscopic dilator Dilapan effectively ripens the cervix before labour induction in women with a previous caesarean scar. They are safe, but more extensive studies are needed to evaluate scar-related complications during labour. <b>Trial Registration</b>: Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2019/03/017927.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8835464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Preinduction Cervical Ripening With Synthetic Hygroscopic Dilators on Maternal Outcomes of Women With Previous Caesarean Pregnancy: A Single-Group Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gowri Dorairajan, Saranya Ravi, Palanivel Chinnakili\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jp/8835464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Preinduction cervical ripening in previous caesarean pregnancy is limited to intracervical Foley catheter. This study is aimed at finding the vaginal birth rates, improvement of Bishop score, and safety of osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S) among women with previous caesarean pregnancy. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted this single-group clinical study after the approval of the institute ethics committee, clinical trial registration, and obtaining informed consent. We recruited women above 18 years with a prior caesarean section at term and a Bishop score of less than 6 by systematic random sampling prospectively. The first or second author inserted two to a maximum of five osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) in the cervical canal. After 24 h, we removed Dilapan and induced labour with a low-dose oxytocin regimen up to a maximum dose of 24 mIU/min. We assessed the improvement of the Bishop score and vaginal birth rates for efficacy and safety concerns like bleeding, fragmentation, displacement, infections, and scar dehiscence. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-two women completed the study. The Bishop score significantly improved from a mean of 2.6 before to 5.3 after Dilapan. Three opted for a caesarean section after Dilapan removal and refused oxytocin infusion. Seventy-nine women completed the trial of labour. Forty-one (52%) achieved active labour (52%). Twenty-seven delivered vaginally, and 52 required emergency caesarean section (34% vaginal birth rate; 18 spontaneous, nine instrumental, four with forceps, and five with vacuum). None had entrapment, fragmentation, or upward displacement of Dilapan. Two women had scar dehiscence, and one had a traumatic postpartum haemorrhage. There was no maternal or perinatal mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> We conclude that the hygroscopic dilator Dilapan effectively ripens the cervix before labour induction in women with a previous caesarean scar. They are safe, but more extensive studies are needed to evaluate scar-related complications during labour. <b>Trial Registration</b>: Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2019/03/017927.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"8835464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/jp/8835464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jp/8835464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:既往剖宫产妊娠诱导前宫颈成熟仅限于宫颈内Foley导管。本研究旨在探讨有剖宫产史妇女阴道分娩率、Bishop评分的改善及渗透扩张器(an- s)的安全性。方法:经研究所伦理委员会批准、临床试验注册并获得知情同意后,开展本单组临床研究。我们采用前瞻性系统随机抽样的方法,招募年龄在18岁以上、有过足月剖宫产史且Bishop评分小于6分的女性。第一或第二作者在宫颈管内插入2至最多5个渗透扩张器(an- s)。24小时后,我们将其移除,并使用最大剂量为24 mIU/min的低剂量催产素方案引产。我们评估了Bishop评分的改善和阴道分娩率的有效性和安全性问题,如出血、碎裂、移位、感染和疤痕开裂。结果:82名女性完成了这项研究。主教的得分从平均分2.6显著提高到平均分5.3。其中三人选择剖宫产,并拒绝注射催产素。79名妇女完成了分娩试验。41例(52%)达到主动分娩(52%)。27人顺产,52人需要紧急剖腹产(顺产率34%;自发18次,器质性9次,钳式4次,真空5次)。没有一个被困住,破碎,或向上位移的破败。两名妇女有疤痕裂开,一名有创伤性产后出血。没有产妇或围产期死亡。结论:我们的结论是,吸湿扩张器在引产前有效地使宫颈成熟,以前有剖腹产疤痕的妇女。它们是安全的,但需要更广泛的研究来评估分娩过程中与疤痕相关的并发症。试验注册:印度临床试验注册:CTRI/2019/03/017927。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Preinduction Cervical Ripening With Synthetic Hygroscopic Dilators on Maternal Outcomes of Women With Previous Caesarean Pregnancy: A Single-Group Clinical Trial.

Background: Preinduction cervical ripening in previous caesarean pregnancy is limited to intracervical Foley catheter. This study is aimed at finding the vaginal birth rates, improvement of Bishop score, and safety of osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S) among women with previous caesarean pregnancy. Methods: We conducted this single-group clinical study after the approval of the institute ethics committee, clinical trial registration, and obtaining informed consent. We recruited women above 18 years with a prior caesarean section at term and a Bishop score of less than 6 by systematic random sampling prospectively. The first or second author inserted two to a maximum of five osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) in the cervical canal. After 24 h, we removed Dilapan and induced labour with a low-dose oxytocin regimen up to a maximum dose of 24 mIU/min. We assessed the improvement of the Bishop score and vaginal birth rates for efficacy and safety concerns like bleeding, fragmentation, displacement, infections, and scar dehiscence. Results: Eighty-two women completed the study. The Bishop score significantly improved from a mean of 2.6 before to 5.3 after Dilapan. Three opted for a caesarean section after Dilapan removal and refused oxytocin infusion. Seventy-nine women completed the trial of labour. Forty-one (52%) achieved active labour (52%). Twenty-seven delivered vaginally, and 52 required emergency caesarean section (34% vaginal birth rate; 18 spontaneous, nine instrumental, four with forceps, and five with vacuum). None had entrapment, fragmentation, or upward displacement of Dilapan. Two women had scar dehiscence, and one had a traumatic postpartum haemorrhage. There was no maternal or perinatal mortality. Conclusions: We conclude that the hygroscopic dilator Dilapan effectively ripens the cervix before labour induction in women with a previous caesarean scar. They are safe, but more extensive studies are needed to evaluate scar-related complications during labour. Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2019/03/017927.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信