肺超声与胸片诊断儿童肺炎的准确性比较:一项基于医院的横断面研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Leul Adane Chemeda, Daniel Zewdneh Solomon, Hanna Damtew Taddese, Henok Hailemichael
{"title":"肺超声与胸片诊断儿童肺炎的准确性比较:一项基于医院的横断面研究。","authors":"Leul Adane Chemeda, Daniel Zewdneh Solomon, Hanna Damtew Taddese, Henok Hailemichael","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.8S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, pediatric pneumonia is diagnosed through clinical examination and chest radiography (CXR), with computed tomography (CT) reserved for complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity due to its portability and absence of ionizing radiation. This study evaluates LUS's accuracy compared to CXR in diagnosing pneumonia in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to September 2023 involving 108 children aged 14 or younger admitted with pneumonia. Each child underwent LUS using a 5-zone scanning protocol, followed by CXR, with the latter interpreted independently by two consultant radiologists. Agreement between LUS and CXR for diagnosing consolidation and interstitial pneumonia patterns was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (k) with SPSS version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pneumonia was radiographically confirmed in 79 children (73.1%). LUS detected consolidation in 41.7% of cases, compared to 43.5% for CXR, demonstrating a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 95.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4%. LUS showed higher accuracy for interstitial lung patterns (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 97.4%). The agreement between LUS and CXR was excellent, with Cohen's Kappa values of 0.908 for consolidation and 0.863 for interstitial pneumonia. LUS also identified more pleural effusions (11.1%) compared to CXR (6.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUS demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to CXR for pneumonia, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for pneumonia-related features. It outperforms CXR in detecting small-volume consolidations and effusions, supporting its routine use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"34 Spec Iss 1","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest Radiography for Diagnosing Pneumonia in Children: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Leul Adane Chemeda, Daniel Zewdneh Solomon, Hanna Damtew Taddese, Henok Hailemichael\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.8S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, pediatric pneumonia is diagnosed through clinical examination and chest radiography (CXR), with computed tomography (CT) reserved for complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity due to its portability and absence of ionizing radiation. This study evaluates LUS's accuracy compared to CXR in diagnosing pneumonia in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to September 2023 involving 108 children aged 14 or younger admitted with pneumonia. Each child underwent LUS using a 5-zone scanning protocol, followed by CXR, with the latter interpreted independently by two consultant radiologists. Agreement between LUS and CXR for diagnosing consolidation and interstitial pneumonia patterns was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (k) with SPSS version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pneumonia was radiographically confirmed in 79 children (73.1%). LUS detected consolidation in 41.7% of cases, compared to 43.5% for CXR, demonstrating a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 95.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4%. LUS showed higher accuracy for interstitial lung patterns (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 97.4%). The agreement between LUS and CXR was excellent, with Cohen's Kappa values of 0.908 for consolidation and 0.863 for interstitial pneumonia. LUS also identified more pleural effusions (11.1%) compared to CXR (6.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUS demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to CXR for pneumonia, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for pneumonia-related features. It outperforms CXR in detecting small-volume consolidations and effusions, supporting its routine use in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 Spec Iss 1\",\"pages\":\"47-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.8S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.8S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统上,儿童肺炎是通过临床检查和胸部x线摄影(CXR)诊断的,而计算机断层扫描(CT)则用于并发症。肺超声(LUS)因其便携性和无电离辐射而受到欢迎。本研究比较了LUS与CXR诊断儿童肺炎的准确性。方法:我们于2023年4月至9月进行了一项横断面研究,涉及108名14岁及以下的肺炎住院儿童。每个儿童使用5区扫描方案进行LUS,然后进行CXR,后者由两名顾问放射科医生独立解释。使用Cohen's Kappa (k)和SPSS 26.0版本评估LUS和CXR诊断实变和间质性肺炎模式的一致性。结果:79例(73.1%)患儿经x线确诊为肺炎。LUS在41.7%的病例中检测到实变,而CXR为43.5%,敏感性为97.8%,特异性为95.2%,阳性预测值(PPV)为93.6%,阴性预测值(NPV)为98.4%。LUS对间质性肺类型具有更高的准确性(敏感性93.6%,特异性97.4%)。LUS与CXR的一致性非常好,实变的Cohen’s Kappa值为0.908,间质性肺炎的Cohen’s Kappa值为0.863。与CXR(6.5%)相比,LUS还发现了更多的胸腔积液(11.1%)。结论:LUS对肺炎的诊断准确性与CXR相当,对肺炎相关特征具有高敏感性和特异性。它在检测小体积实变和积液方面优于CXR,支持其在临床环境中的常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest Radiography for Diagnosing Pneumonia in Children: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Traditionally, pediatric pneumonia is diagnosed through clinical examination and chest radiography (CXR), with computed tomography (CT) reserved for complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity due to its portability and absence of ionizing radiation. This study evaluates LUS's accuracy compared to CXR in diagnosing pneumonia in children.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to September 2023 involving 108 children aged 14 or younger admitted with pneumonia. Each child underwent LUS using a 5-zone scanning protocol, followed by CXR, with the latter interpreted independently by two consultant radiologists. Agreement between LUS and CXR for diagnosing consolidation and interstitial pneumonia patterns was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (k) with SPSS version 26.0.

Results: Pneumonia was radiographically confirmed in 79 children (73.1%). LUS detected consolidation in 41.7% of cases, compared to 43.5% for CXR, demonstrating a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 95.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4%. LUS showed higher accuracy for interstitial lung patterns (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 97.4%). The agreement between LUS and CXR was excellent, with Cohen's Kappa values of 0.908 for consolidation and 0.863 for interstitial pneumonia. LUS also identified more pleural effusions (11.1%) compared to CXR (6.5%).

Conclusion: LUS demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to CXR for pneumonia, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for pneumonia-related features. It outperforms CXR in detecting small-volume consolidations and effusions, supporting its routine use in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信