在团队中建立信任关系,以支持人力服务中的证据使用和实施:培训和指导方法的可行性和可接受性。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741
Allison Metz, Todd M Jensen, Lacy Dicharry, Amanda B Farley
{"title":"在团队中建立信任关系,以支持人力服务中的证据使用和实施:培训和指导方法的可行性和可接受性。","authors":"Allison Metz, Todd M Jensen, Lacy Dicharry, Amanda B Farley","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professionals who provide implementation support in human service systems describe relationships as being critical to support evidence use; however, developing trusting relationships are not strongly featured in implementation science literature. The aims of this study were to (a) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven training and coaching approach for building trusting relationships among members of an implementation team who were supporting the implementation of an evidence-informed program in a public child welfare system in the United States and (b) gauge the initial efficacy of the approach in terms of the development of trusting relationships and subsequent implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consistent with a convergent mixed-methods approach, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data to address our research questions. Quantitative methods included an adapted version of the Trusting Relationship Questionnaire, a seven-item measure of psychological safety, and items designed to measure acceptability of the training. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen individuals participated in the program, consisting of a kick-off training event, five monthly training modules, and five monthly coaching sessions with implementation team leads. Session attendance rates and self-reported satisfaction highlight the general feasibility and acceptability of the training and coaching approach. On average, participants also reported significant increases over time in their perceptions that they were trusted by their team. Results from in-depth interviews further indicated the efficacy of the program in terms of cultivating trust among team members and promoting several elements that were theorized to link trusting relationships to implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggest the training and coaching approach for trust building was acceptable and feasible. Additionally, results indicate the value of the approach in building trust among implementation partners to increase commitment to implementation efforts, promote a culture of learning and psychological safety, and increase participants' sense of capability and motivation for supporting implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1353741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building trusting relationships in teams to support evidence use and implementation in human services: feasibility and acceptability of a training and coaching approach.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Metz, Todd M Jensen, Lacy Dicharry, Amanda B Farley\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professionals who provide implementation support in human service systems describe relationships as being critical to support evidence use; however, developing trusting relationships are not strongly featured in implementation science literature. The aims of this study were to (a) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven training and coaching approach for building trusting relationships among members of an implementation team who were supporting the implementation of an evidence-informed program in a public child welfare system in the United States and (b) gauge the initial efficacy of the approach in terms of the development of trusting relationships and subsequent implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consistent with a convergent mixed-methods approach, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data to address our research questions. Quantitative methods included an adapted version of the Trusting Relationship Questionnaire, a seven-item measure of psychological safety, and items designed to measure acceptability of the training. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen individuals participated in the program, consisting of a kick-off training event, five monthly training modules, and five monthly coaching sessions with implementation team leads. Session attendance rates and self-reported satisfaction highlight the general feasibility and acceptability of the training and coaching approach. On average, participants also reported significant increases over time in their perceptions that they were trusted by their team. Results from in-depth interviews further indicated the efficacy of the program in terms of cultivating trust among team members and promoting several elements that were theorized to link trusting relationships to implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggest the training and coaching approach for trust building was acceptable and feasible. Additionally, results indicate the value of the approach in building trust among implementation partners to increase commitment to implementation efforts, promote a culture of learning and psychological safety, and increase participants' sense of capability and motivation for supporting implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1353741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在人类服务系统中提供实施支持的专业人员将关系描述为支持证据使用的关键;然而,发展信任关系在实施科学文献中并没有很强的特色。本研究的目的是(a)评估理论驱动的培训和指导方法的可行性和可接受性,以在支持在美国公共儿童福利系统中实施循证项目的实施团队成员之间建立信任关系;(b)根据信任关系的发展和随后的实施结果衡量该方法的初始有效性。方法:采用融合混合方法,我们收集了定量和定性数据来解决我们的研究问题。定量方法包括一个改编版的信任关系问卷,一个七项的心理安全测量,以及旨在测量培训可接受性的项目。定性数据是通过对参与者的半结构化访谈收集的。结果:16个人参加了该项目,包括一个启动培训活动,五个每月培训模块,以及五个每月与实施团队领导进行的指导会议。会议出勤率和自我报告的满意度突出了培训和指导方法的总体可行性和可接受性。平均而言,参与者还报告说,随着时间的推移,他们认为自己被团队信任的感觉显著增强。深度访谈的结果进一步表明,在培养团队成员之间的信任方面,该计划的有效性,并促进了将信任关系与实施结果联系起来的几个要素。讨论:研究结果表明,培训和指导方法的信任建立是可接受的和可行的。此外,结果表明,该方法的价值在于在实施伙伴之间建立信任,以增加对实施工作的承诺,促进学习文化和心理安全,并增加参与者支持实施的能力和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building trusting relationships in teams to support evidence use and implementation in human services: feasibility and acceptability of a training and coaching approach.

Background: Professionals who provide implementation support in human service systems describe relationships as being critical to support evidence use; however, developing trusting relationships are not strongly featured in implementation science literature. The aims of this study were to (a) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven training and coaching approach for building trusting relationships among members of an implementation team who were supporting the implementation of an evidence-informed program in a public child welfare system in the United States and (b) gauge the initial efficacy of the approach in terms of the development of trusting relationships and subsequent implementation outcomes.

Methods: Consistent with a convergent mixed-methods approach, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data to address our research questions. Quantitative methods included an adapted version of the Trusting Relationship Questionnaire, a seven-item measure of psychological safety, and items designed to measure acceptability of the training. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants.

Results: Sixteen individuals participated in the program, consisting of a kick-off training event, five monthly training modules, and five monthly coaching sessions with implementation team leads. Session attendance rates and self-reported satisfaction highlight the general feasibility and acceptability of the training and coaching approach. On average, participants also reported significant increases over time in their perceptions that they were trusted by their team. Results from in-depth interviews further indicated the efficacy of the program in terms of cultivating trust among team members and promoting several elements that were theorized to link trusting relationships to implementation outcomes.

Discussion: Findings suggest the training and coaching approach for trust building was acceptable and feasible. Additionally, results indicate the value of the approach in building trust among implementation partners to increase commitment to implementation efforts, promote a culture of learning and psychological safety, and increase participants' sense of capability and motivation for supporting implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信