{"title":"超声内镜引导下组织采集对疑似胰腺或胆管癌血管外迁移转移的血管周围软组织割伤的临床表现(附视频)。","authors":"Kosuke Maehara, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Daiki Agarie, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Yasuhiro Komori, Takehiko Koga, Atsushi Kanno, Tsunao Imamura, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka","doi":"10.1111/den.14983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing (PSTC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center, retrospective study evaluated patients in whom EUS-TA was performed for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer lesions between October 2017 and March 2024. PSTC was defined as a perivascular soft-tissue area contiguous with nearby blood vessels from the suspected primary tumor. EUS-TA procedures and outcomes, including technical success, diagnostic performance, adverse events, and comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1803 patients, 53 underwent EUS-TA for PSTC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.1%, 100%, and 92.5%, respectively. The technical success rate was 98.1% (52/53). The adverse event rate was 1.9%. EUS-TA for PSTC was significantly superior to CECT for PSTC in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance and adverse event rates for EUS-TA for PSTC were comparable to those for TA in solid tumors. Shorter puncture lengths were associated with lower accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EUS-TA for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events, showing superior diagnostic performance compared to CECT. These findings suggest that EUS-TA for PSTC can be performed safely and is a clinically beneficial procedure. Despite the technical challenges, EUS-TA for PSTC can influence clinical judgment and should be considered in skilled institutions for future patient treatment decisions. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 6","pages":"695-703"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.14983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing suspected to be extravascular migratory metastases of pancreatic or bile duct cancer (with video)\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Maehara, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Daiki Agarie, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Yasuhiro Komori, Takehiko Koga, Atsushi Kanno, Tsunao Imamura, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.14983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing (PSTC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center, retrospective study evaluated patients in whom EUS-TA was performed for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer lesions between October 2017 and March 2024. PSTC was defined as a perivascular soft-tissue area contiguous with nearby blood vessels from the suspected primary tumor. EUS-TA procedures and outcomes, including technical success, diagnostic performance, adverse events, and comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), were analyzed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 1803 patients, 53 underwent EUS-TA for PSTC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.1%, 100%, and 92.5%, respectively. The technical success rate was 98.1% (52/53). The adverse event rate was 1.9%. EUS-TA for PSTC was significantly superior to CECT for PSTC in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance and adverse event rates for EUS-TA for PSTC were comparable to those for TA in solid tumors. Shorter puncture lengths were associated with lower accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>EUS-TA for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events, showing superior diagnostic performance compared to CECT. These findings suggest that EUS-TA for PSTC can be performed safely and is a clinically beneficial procedure. Despite the technical challenges, EUS-TA for PSTC can influence clinical judgment and should be considered in skilled institutions for future patient treatment decisions. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"695-703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.14983\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing suspected to be extravascular migratory metastases of pancreatic or bile duct cancer (with video)
Objectives
This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing (PSTC).
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated patients in whom EUS-TA was performed for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer lesions between October 2017 and March 2024. PSTC was defined as a perivascular soft-tissue area contiguous with nearby blood vessels from the suspected primary tumor. EUS-TA procedures and outcomes, including technical success, diagnostic performance, adverse events, and comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), were analyzed.
Results
Of 1803 patients, 53 underwent EUS-TA for PSTC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.1%, 100%, and 92.5%, respectively. The technical success rate was 98.1% (52/53). The adverse event rate was 1.9%. EUS-TA for PSTC was significantly superior to CECT for PSTC in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance and adverse event rates for EUS-TA for PSTC were comparable to those for TA in solid tumors. Shorter puncture lengths were associated with lower accuracy.
Conclusion
EUS-TA for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events, showing superior diagnostic performance compared to CECT. These findings suggest that EUS-TA for PSTC can be performed safely and is a clinically beneficial procedure. Despite the technical challenges, EUS-TA for PSTC can influence clinical judgment and should be considered in skilled institutions for future patient treatment decisions. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate its efficacy and safety.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.