护士日间过度嗜睡的全球流行:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kaini Gu, Huigang Chen, Hong Shi, Cui Hua
{"title":"护士日间过度嗜睡的全球流行:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kaini Gu, Huigang Chen, Hong Shi, Cui Hua","doi":"10.1111/inr.13087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses face significant risks of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), which adversely affects workplace safety and productivity. Yet, the extent of EDS in this workforce remains inadequately characterized.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aims of this systematic review were to assess the pooled prevalence of EDS among nurses.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for observational studies reporting the prevalence of EDS, as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), from database inception to May 1, 2024, with no language restrictions. Study quality was evaluated using JBI's critical appraisal tool. Pooled estimates were calculated through random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessing associations between EDS prevalence and study-level factors. Linear regression modeling was used to assess time trends. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024535109).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 36 unique studies encompassing 2677 nurses from 20 countries. EDS occurred in 14.0%-55.6% of nurses. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled prevalence of EDS of 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.5-36.1; I<sup>2 </sup>= 92.6). Prevalence estimate did not vary substantially in terms of study-level data (i.e., region, country income, pre/post covid era, hospital type, proportion of female nurse, average nursing experience, or proportion of married nurses). The prevalence of EDS in nurses has remained unchanged over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis identifies a high global prevalence of EDS among nurses, affecting nearly one-third of this workforce. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to mitigate EDS across diverse geographic and economic contexts.</p><p><strong>Implication for nursing and nursing policy: </strong>This study highlights the pervasive issue of EDS among nurses worldwide, necessitating comprehensive strategies to address this challenge across all regions, income levels, hospital settings, and demographic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"72 1","pages":"e13087"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kaini Gu, Huigang Chen, Hong Shi, Cui Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inr.13087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses face significant risks of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), which adversely affects workplace safety and productivity. Yet, the extent of EDS in this workforce remains inadequately characterized.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aims of this systematic review were to assess the pooled prevalence of EDS among nurses.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for observational studies reporting the prevalence of EDS, as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), from database inception to May 1, 2024, with no language restrictions. Study quality was evaluated using JBI's critical appraisal tool. Pooled estimates were calculated through random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessing associations between EDS prevalence and study-level factors. Linear regression modeling was used to assess time trends. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024535109).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 36 unique studies encompassing 2677 nurses from 20 countries. EDS occurred in 14.0%-55.6% of nurses. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled prevalence of EDS of 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.5-36.1; I<sup>2 </sup>= 92.6). Prevalence estimate did not vary substantially in terms of study-level data (i.e., region, country income, pre/post covid era, hospital type, proportion of female nurse, average nursing experience, or proportion of married nurses). The prevalence of EDS in nurses has remained unchanged over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis identifies a high global prevalence of EDS among nurses, affecting nearly one-third of this workforce. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to mitigate EDS across diverse geographic and economic contexts.</p><p><strong>Implication for nursing and nursing policy: </strong>This study highlights the pervasive issue of EDS among nurses worldwide, necessitating comprehensive strategies to address this challenge across all regions, income levels, hospital settings, and demographic groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"e13087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护士面临着白天过度嗜睡(EDS)的重大风险,这对工作场所的安全和生产力产生不利影响。然而,EDS在劳动力中的程度仍然没有得到充分的描述。目的:本系统综述的目的是评估护士中EDS的总体患病率。方法:我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和ISI Web of Science,以获取从数据库建立到2024年5月1日,无语言限制的Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)测量的EDS患病率的观察性研究。使用JBI的关键评估工具评估研究质量。通过随机效应荟萃分析计算汇总估计值,亚组和荟萃回归分析评估EDS患病率与研究水平因素之间的关联。采用线性回归模型评估时间趋势。本研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024535109)。结果:我们纳入了36项独特的研究,涵盖了来自20个国家的2677名护士。EDS发生率为14.0% ~ 55.6%。meta分析结果显示EDS的总患病率为32.2%(95%可信区间[CI]: 28.5-36.1;i2 = 92.6)。患病率估计值在研究水平数据(即地区、国家收入、covid前/后时代、医院类型、女护士比例、平均护理经验或已婚护士比例)方面没有显着差异。随着时间的推移,护士中EDS的患病率一直保持不变。结论:本荟萃分析确定了全球护士中EDS的高患病率,影响了近三分之一的劳动力。研究结果强调,迫切需要有针对性的干预措施,以减轻不同地理和经济背景下的EDS。对护理和护理政策的启示:本研究强调了全球护士中普遍存在的EDS问题,需要采取综合战略来应对所有地区、收入水平、医院环境和人口群体的这一挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Nurses face significant risks of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), which adversely affects workplace safety and productivity. Yet, the extent of EDS in this workforce remains inadequately characterized.

Aim: The aims of this systematic review were to assess the pooled prevalence of EDS among nurses.

Methodology: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for observational studies reporting the prevalence of EDS, as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), from database inception to May 1, 2024, with no language restrictions. Study quality was evaluated using JBI's critical appraisal tool. Pooled estimates were calculated through random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessing associations between EDS prevalence and study-level factors. Linear regression modeling was used to assess time trends. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024535109).

Results: We included 36 unique studies encompassing 2677 nurses from 20 countries. EDS occurred in 14.0%-55.6% of nurses. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled prevalence of EDS of 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.5-36.1; I= 92.6). Prevalence estimate did not vary substantially in terms of study-level data (i.e., region, country income, pre/post covid era, hospital type, proportion of female nurse, average nursing experience, or proportion of married nurses). The prevalence of EDS in nurses has remained unchanged over time.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis identifies a high global prevalence of EDS among nurses, affecting nearly one-third of this workforce. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to mitigate EDS across diverse geographic and economic contexts.

Implication for nursing and nursing policy: This study highlights the pervasive issue of EDS among nurses worldwide, necessitating comprehensive strategies to address this challenge across all regions, income levels, hospital settings, and demographic groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信