关节镜下部分腕部关节融合术的中短期临床和影像学结果——系统综述。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Genevieve L DE LA Motte, Joshua Xu, Tahlia Halasz-Valverde, David J Graham, Brahman S Sivakumar
{"title":"关节镜下部分腕部关节融合术的中短期临床和影像学结果——系统综述。","authors":"Genevieve L DE LA Motte, Joshua Xu, Tahlia Halasz-Valverde, David J Graham, Brahman S Sivakumar","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Partial wrist arthrodesis (PWA) is a salvage procedure used in advanced wrist arthritis and has traditionally been performed via an open dorsal approach. In recent years, surgeons have moved towards arthroscopic fusions to minimise soft tissue damage and preserve vascular supply, increase union rates and hasten recovery. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current literature on the outcomes of arthroscopic PWA. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was performed to survey the literature regarding outcomes of PWA. English language studies that reported original data and commented on at least one postoperative measure of function were eligible for inclusion. Data collected included patient demographics, operation time and technique, complications and postoperative patient outcomes in the form of patient-rated surveys, grip strength, range of motion and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS). <b>Results:</b> Twelve studies were eligible for inclusion, with a total of 191 patients. 94% of patients achieved union, with a mean time to fusion of 12.5 weeks. VAS, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Wrist scores were significantly improved after the procedure, and complication rates were comparable to open procedures. Range of motion varied greatly across studies, due to heterogeneity in carpal intervals fused. <b>Conclusions:</b> Arthroscopic PWA is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of advanced arthritis of the wrist. Further comparative studies would be useful in assessing benefits of arthroscopic arthrodesis over an open approach. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short and Medium-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Partial Wrist Arthrodeses - A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Genevieve L DE LA Motte, Joshua Xu, Tahlia Halasz-Valverde, David J Graham, Brahman S Sivakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Partial wrist arthrodesis (PWA) is a salvage procedure used in advanced wrist arthritis and has traditionally been performed via an open dorsal approach. In recent years, surgeons have moved towards arthroscopic fusions to minimise soft tissue damage and preserve vascular supply, increase union rates and hasten recovery. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current literature on the outcomes of arthroscopic PWA. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was performed to survey the literature regarding outcomes of PWA. English language studies that reported original data and commented on at least one postoperative measure of function were eligible for inclusion. Data collected included patient demographics, operation time and technique, complications and postoperative patient outcomes in the form of patient-rated surveys, grip strength, range of motion and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS). <b>Results:</b> Twelve studies were eligible for inclusion, with a total of 191 patients. 94% of patients achieved union, with a mean time to fusion of 12.5 weeks. VAS, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Wrist scores were significantly improved after the procedure, and complication rates were comparable to open procedures. Range of motion varied greatly across studies, due to heterogeneity in carpal intervals fused. <b>Conclusions:</b> Arthroscopic PWA is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of advanced arthritis of the wrist. Further comparative studies would be useful in assessing benefits of arthroscopic arthrodesis over an open approach. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:部分腕部关节融合术(PWA)是一种用于晚期腕部关节炎的抢救手术,传统上通过开放的背侧入路进行。近年来,外科医生已经转向关节镜融合术,以尽量减少软组织损伤,保持血管供应,提高愈合率并加速恢复。本研究的目的是综合目前关于关节镜下PWA结果的文献。方法:系统回顾有关PWA治疗结果的文献。报告原始数据并评论至少一项术后功能测量的英语研究符合纳入条件。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、手术时间和技术、并发症和术后患者结果(以患者评分调查的形式)、握力、活动范围和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)。结果:12项研究符合纳入条件,共191例患者。94%的患者愈合,平均融合时间为12.5周。术后VAS、臂肩手残疾评分(DASH)和Mayo手腕评分均显著改善,并发症发生率与开放手术相当。由于融合腕关节间段的异质性,不同研究的运动范围差异很大。结论:关节镜下PWA是一种安全有效的治疗晚期腕关节关节炎的方法。进一步的比较研究将有助于评估关节镜下关节融合术相对于开放入路的益处。证据等级:III级(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short and Medium-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Partial Wrist Arthrodeses - A Systematic Review.

Background: Partial wrist arthrodesis (PWA) is a salvage procedure used in advanced wrist arthritis and has traditionally been performed via an open dorsal approach. In recent years, surgeons have moved towards arthroscopic fusions to minimise soft tissue damage and preserve vascular supply, increase union rates and hasten recovery. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current literature on the outcomes of arthroscopic PWA. Methods: A systematic review was performed to survey the literature regarding outcomes of PWA. English language studies that reported original data and commented on at least one postoperative measure of function were eligible for inclusion. Data collected included patient demographics, operation time and technique, complications and postoperative patient outcomes in the form of patient-rated surveys, grip strength, range of motion and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Twelve studies were eligible for inclusion, with a total of 191 patients. 94% of patients achieved union, with a mean time to fusion of 12.5 weeks. VAS, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Wrist scores were significantly improved after the procedure, and complication rates were comparable to open procedures. Range of motion varied greatly across studies, due to heterogeneity in carpal intervals fused. Conclusions: Arthroscopic PWA is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of advanced arthritis of the wrist. Further comparative studies would be useful in assessing benefits of arthroscopic arthrodesis over an open approach. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信