{"title":"产后低奶风险人群的产后立即避孕植入和母乳喂养成功:一项随机非劣效性试验","authors":"Erika E. Levi , Karina Avila , Haotian Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our goal was to measure the impact of postpartum contraceptive implant insertion timing on breastfeeding success and duration in a population at high-risk for low milk supply.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a three-armed randomized non-inferiority study of postpartum people who plan to breastfeed and have known risk factors for low milk supply. Participants were randomized to one of three groups for the timing of implant placement: within 30 minutes of placental delivery, 24–72 hours postpartum, or 6+ weeks postpartum. The primary outcome was time to lactogenesis II (LII). Secondary outcomes included duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and implant satisfaction through 6 months postpartum.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 155 participants. Compared to those who received implants 6+ weeks postpartum, those who received it ≤30 minutes postpartum (mean difference: 2.92 hours, 95% CI: −9.26, 15.1, <em>p</em> = 0.64) or 1–3 days postpartum (mean difference: −0.75 hours, 95% CI: −13.02, 11.51, <em>p</em> = 0.90) had similar time to LII. Similar results were observed for intention to treat analysis. Duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and implant satisfaction were similar among all groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Unfortunately, our results did not meet the threshold of non-inferiority because the confidence intervals included the 8 hours non-inferiority margin defined a priori. However, our results indicate similar time to LII between groups. Ultimately, our study suggests that early etonogestrel implant insertion does not affect breastfeeding success among postpartum people at risk for low milk supply.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Etonogestrel implant insertion can be offered anytime postpartum to meet the needs of postpartum people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 110806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate postpartum contraceptive implant placement and breastfeeding success in postpartum people at risk for low milk supply: A randomized non-inferiority trial\",\"authors\":\"Erika E. Levi , Karina Avila , Haotian Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our goal was to measure the impact of postpartum contraceptive implant insertion timing on breastfeeding success and duration in a population at high-risk for low milk supply.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a three-armed randomized non-inferiority study of postpartum people who plan to breastfeed and have known risk factors for low milk supply. Participants were randomized to one of three groups for the timing of implant placement: within 30 minutes of placental delivery, 24–72 hours postpartum, or 6+ weeks postpartum. The primary outcome was time to lactogenesis II (LII). Secondary outcomes included duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and implant satisfaction through 6 months postpartum.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 155 participants. Compared to those who received implants 6+ weeks postpartum, those who received it ≤30 minutes postpartum (mean difference: 2.92 hours, 95% CI: −9.26, 15.1, <em>p</em> = 0.64) or 1–3 days postpartum (mean difference: −0.75 hours, 95% CI: −13.02, 11.51, <em>p</em> = 0.90) had similar time to LII. Similar results were observed for intention to treat analysis. Duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and implant satisfaction were similar among all groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Unfortunately, our results did not meet the threshold of non-inferiority because the confidence intervals included the 8 hours non-inferiority margin defined a priori. However, our results indicate similar time to LII between groups. Ultimately, our study suggests that early etonogestrel implant insertion does not affect breastfeeding success among postpartum people at risk for low milk supply.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Etonogestrel implant insertion can be offered anytime postpartum to meet the needs of postpartum people.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424005201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424005201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immediate postpartum contraceptive implant placement and breastfeeding success in postpartum people at risk for low milk supply: A randomized non-inferiority trial
Objectives
Our goal was to measure the impact of postpartum contraceptive implant insertion timing on breastfeeding success and duration in a population at high-risk for low milk supply.
Study design
We conducted a three-armed randomized non-inferiority study of postpartum people who plan to breastfeed and have known risk factors for low milk supply. Participants were randomized to one of three groups for the timing of implant placement: within 30 minutes of placental delivery, 24–72 hours postpartum, or 6+ weeks postpartum. The primary outcome was time to lactogenesis II (LII). Secondary outcomes included duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and implant satisfaction through 6 months postpartum.
Results
We enrolled 155 participants. Compared to those who received implants 6+ weeks postpartum, those who received it ≤30 minutes postpartum (mean difference: 2.92 hours, 95% CI: −9.26, 15.1, p = 0.64) or 1–3 days postpartum (mean difference: −0.75 hours, 95% CI: −13.02, 11.51, p = 0.90) had similar time to LII. Similar results were observed for intention to treat analysis. Duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and implant satisfaction were similar among all groups.
Conclusions
Unfortunately, our results did not meet the threshold of non-inferiority because the confidence intervals included the 8 hours non-inferiority margin defined a priori. However, our results indicate similar time to LII between groups. Ultimately, our study suggests that early etonogestrel implant insertion does not affect breastfeeding success among postpartum people at risk for low milk supply.
Implications
Etonogestrel implant insertion can be offered anytime postpartum to meet the needs of postpartum people.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.