转诊网络、种族不平等和心脏直视手术的医院质量。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
C Ben Gibson, Cheryl L Damberg, Jose J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Megan S Schuler, Luke J Matthews, Ioana Popescu
{"title":"转诊网络、种族不平等和心脏直视手术的医院质量。","authors":"C Ben Gibson, Cheryl L Damberg, Jose J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Megan S Schuler, Luke J Matthews, Ioana Popescu","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in the quality of hospitals where Black and White patients receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have been documented. We examined the contributions of physician networks to the gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of all Medicare fee-for-service Black and White patients undergoing elective CABG during 2017 to 2019; the primary care physicians and cardiologists treating them for 12 months before surgery (the patients' physician network); and CABG-performing hospitals within 100 miles of each patient. We measured the strength of ties between treating physicians and hospitals as the number of shared prior CABG patients (24 months before surgery). Conditional logit models assessed the relationship between race, prior physician-hospital ties, and receiving CABG at hospitals with minimum versus the median-above-minimum mortality difference, while accounting for home-to-hospital distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 76 376 patients; 5.1% were Blackpatients. Black and White patients were admitted to similar mortality hospitals (3.1% versus 3.1%; <i>P</i>=0.07), but Black patients lived closer to lower-mortality hospitals than White patients (mean hospital mortality within median travel distance, 2.5% versus 2.7%; <i>P</i><0.001). Black patients were treated less often at the lowest-mortality hospitals overall and within the median travel distance (10.5% versus 13.9% and 37.4% versus 45.1%; <i>P</i><0.001 for both). In conditional logit models, the Black-White risk ratio of using hospitals with median versus lowest mortality was 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.98-1.06]; <i>P</i>=0.18) in models including only race and hospital mortality; 1.07 ([95% CI, 1.01-1.13]; <i>P</i><0.001) in models adding home-to-hospital distances; and 1.06 ([95% CI, 0.96-1.16]; <i>P</i>=0.11) in models also accounting for physician-hospital ties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the improvement of previously described disparities in the quality of hospitals treating Black and White patients, Black patients remain less likely to undergo CABG at their lowest available mortality hospitals, possibly due to suboptimal physician referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e010778"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referral Networks, Racial Inequity, and Hospital Quality for Open Heart Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"C Ben Gibson, Cheryl L Damberg, Jose J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Megan S Schuler, Luke J Matthews, Ioana Popescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in the quality of hospitals where Black and White patients receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have been documented. We examined the contributions of physician networks to the gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of all Medicare fee-for-service Black and White patients undergoing elective CABG during 2017 to 2019; the primary care physicians and cardiologists treating them for 12 months before surgery (the patients' physician network); and CABG-performing hospitals within 100 miles of each patient. We measured the strength of ties between treating physicians and hospitals as the number of shared prior CABG patients (24 months before surgery). Conditional logit models assessed the relationship between race, prior physician-hospital ties, and receiving CABG at hospitals with minimum versus the median-above-minimum mortality difference, while accounting for home-to-hospital distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 76 376 patients; 5.1% were Blackpatients. Black and White patients were admitted to similar mortality hospitals (3.1% versus 3.1%; <i>P</i>=0.07), but Black patients lived closer to lower-mortality hospitals than White patients (mean hospital mortality within median travel distance, 2.5% versus 2.7%; <i>P</i><0.001). Black patients were treated less often at the lowest-mortality hospitals overall and within the median travel distance (10.5% versus 13.9% and 37.4% versus 45.1%; <i>P</i><0.001 for both). In conditional logit models, the Black-White risk ratio of using hospitals with median versus lowest mortality was 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.98-1.06]; <i>P</i>=0.18) in models including only race and hospital mortality; 1.07 ([95% CI, 1.01-1.13]; <i>P</i><0.001) in models adding home-to-hospital distances; and 1.06 ([95% CI, 0.96-1.16]; <i>P</i>=0.11) in models also accounting for physician-hospital ties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the improvement of previously described disparities in the quality of hospitals treating Black and White patients, Black patients remain less likely to undergo CABG at their lowest available mortality hospitals, possibly due to suboptimal physician referrals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e010778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黑人和白人患者接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的医院质量差异已被记录在案。我们调查了医生网络对这一差距的贡献。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象是2017年至2019年期间接受选择性冠脉搭桥的所有医疗保险按服务收费的黑人和白人患者;术前12个月为患者治疗的初级保健医生和心脏病专家(患者的医生网络);以及距每位患者100英里以内的cabg医院我们测量了治疗医生和医院之间的联系强度,即共享CABG患者的数量(术前24个月)。考虑到家到医院的距离,条件logit模型评估了种族、先前的医生-医院关系以及在死亡率差异最小与中位数高于最小的医院接受CABG之间的关系。结果:共纳入76 376例患者;5.1%为黑人患者。黑人和白人患者在相似的死亡率医院住院(3.1%对3.1%;P=0.07),但黑人患者比白人患者住在离低死亡率医院更近的地方(中位出行距离内的平均医院死亡率为2.5%比2.7%;PPP=0.18)在只包括种族和医院死亡率的模型中;1.07 ([95% ci, 1.01-1.13];PP=0.11),也考虑了医生与医院的关系。结论:尽管先前描述的医院治疗黑人和白人患者的质量差异有所改善,但黑人患者仍然不太可能在死亡率最低的医院接受CABG,可能是由于医生转诊不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Referral Networks, Racial Inequity, and Hospital Quality for Open Heart Surgery.

Background: Differences in the quality of hospitals where Black and White patients receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have been documented. We examined the contributions of physician networks to the gap.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of all Medicare fee-for-service Black and White patients undergoing elective CABG during 2017 to 2019; the primary care physicians and cardiologists treating them for 12 months before surgery (the patients' physician network); and CABG-performing hospitals within 100 miles of each patient. We measured the strength of ties between treating physicians and hospitals as the number of shared prior CABG patients (24 months before surgery). Conditional logit models assessed the relationship between race, prior physician-hospital ties, and receiving CABG at hospitals with minimum versus the median-above-minimum mortality difference, while accounting for home-to-hospital distances.

Results: The study included 76 376 patients; 5.1% were Blackpatients. Black and White patients were admitted to similar mortality hospitals (3.1% versus 3.1%; P=0.07), but Black patients lived closer to lower-mortality hospitals than White patients (mean hospital mortality within median travel distance, 2.5% versus 2.7%; P<0.001). Black patients were treated less often at the lowest-mortality hospitals overall and within the median travel distance (10.5% versus 13.9% and 37.4% versus 45.1%; P<0.001 for both). In conditional logit models, the Black-White risk ratio of using hospitals with median versus lowest mortality was 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.98-1.06]; P=0.18) in models including only race and hospital mortality; 1.07 ([95% CI, 1.01-1.13]; P<0.001) in models adding home-to-hospital distances; and 1.06 ([95% CI, 0.96-1.16]; P=0.11) in models also accounting for physician-hospital ties.

Conclusions: Despite the improvement of previously described disparities in the quality of hospitals treating Black and White patients, Black patients remain less likely to undergo CABG at their lowest available mortality hospitals, possibly due to suboptimal physician referrals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信