C Ben Gibson, Cheryl L Damberg, Jose J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Megan S Schuler, Luke J Matthews, Ioana Popescu
{"title":"转诊网络、种族不平等和心脏直视手术的医院质量。","authors":"C Ben Gibson, Cheryl L Damberg, Jose J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Megan S Schuler, Luke J Matthews, Ioana Popescu","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in the quality of hospitals where Black and White patients receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have been documented. We examined the contributions of physician networks to the gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of all Medicare fee-for-service Black and White patients undergoing elective CABG during 2017 to 2019; the primary care physicians and cardiologists treating them for 12 months before surgery (the patients' physician network); and CABG-performing hospitals within 100 miles of each patient. We measured the strength of ties between treating physicians and hospitals as the number of shared prior CABG patients (24 months before surgery). Conditional logit models assessed the relationship between race, prior physician-hospital ties, and receiving CABG at hospitals with minimum versus the median-above-minimum mortality difference, while accounting for home-to-hospital distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 76 376 patients; 5.1% were Blackpatients. Black and White patients were admitted to similar mortality hospitals (3.1% versus 3.1%; <i>P</i>=0.07), but Black patients lived closer to lower-mortality hospitals than White patients (mean hospital mortality within median travel distance, 2.5% versus 2.7%; <i>P</i><0.001). Black patients were treated less often at the lowest-mortality hospitals overall and within the median travel distance (10.5% versus 13.9% and 37.4% versus 45.1%; <i>P</i><0.001 for both). In conditional logit models, the Black-White risk ratio of using hospitals with median versus lowest mortality was 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.98-1.06]; <i>P</i>=0.18) in models including only race and hospital mortality; 1.07 ([95% CI, 1.01-1.13]; <i>P</i><0.001) in models adding home-to-hospital distances; and 1.06 ([95% CI, 0.96-1.16]; <i>P</i>=0.11) in models also accounting for physician-hospital ties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the improvement of previously described disparities in the quality of hospitals treating Black and White patients, Black patients remain less likely to undergo CABG at their lowest available mortality hospitals, possibly due to suboptimal physician referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e010778"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referral Networks, Racial Inequity, and Hospital Quality for Open Heart Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"C Ben Gibson, Cheryl L Damberg, Jose J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Megan S Schuler, Luke J Matthews, Ioana Popescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in the quality of hospitals where Black and White patients receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have been documented. We examined the contributions of physician networks to the gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of all Medicare fee-for-service Black and White patients undergoing elective CABG during 2017 to 2019; the primary care physicians and cardiologists treating them for 12 months before surgery (the patients' physician network); and CABG-performing hospitals within 100 miles of each patient. We measured the strength of ties between treating physicians and hospitals as the number of shared prior CABG patients (24 months before surgery). Conditional logit models assessed the relationship between race, prior physician-hospital ties, and receiving CABG at hospitals with minimum versus the median-above-minimum mortality difference, while accounting for home-to-hospital distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 76 376 patients; 5.1% were Blackpatients. Black and White patients were admitted to similar mortality hospitals (3.1% versus 3.1%; <i>P</i>=0.07), but Black patients lived closer to lower-mortality hospitals than White patients (mean hospital mortality within median travel distance, 2.5% versus 2.7%; <i>P</i><0.001). Black patients were treated less often at the lowest-mortality hospitals overall and within the median travel distance (10.5% versus 13.9% and 37.4% versus 45.1%; <i>P</i><0.001 for both). In conditional logit models, the Black-White risk ratio of using hospitals with median versus lowest mortality was 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.98-1.06]; <i>P</i>=0.18) in models including only race and hospital mortality; 1.07 ([95% CI, 1.01-1.13]; <i>P</i><0.001) in models adding home-to-hospital distances; and 1.06 ([95% CI, 0.96-1.16]; <i>P</i>=0.11) in models also accounting for physician-hospital ties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the improvement of previously described disparities in the quality of hospitals treating Black and White patients, Black patients remain less likely to undergo CABG at their lowest available mortality hospitals, possibly due to suboptimal physician referrals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e010778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Referral Networks, Racial Inequity, and Hospital Quality for Open Heart Surgery.
Background: Differences in the quality of hospitals where Black and White patients receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have been documented. We examined the contributions of physician networks to the gap.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of all Medicare fee-for-service Black and White patients undergoing elective CABG during 2017 to 2019; the primary care physicians and cardiologists treating them for 12 months before surgery (the patients' physician network); and CABG-performing hospitals within 100 miles of each patient. We measured the strength of ties between treating physicians and hospitals as the number of shared prior CABG patients (24 months before surgery). Conditional logit models assessed the relationship between race, prior physician-hospital ties, and receiving CABG at hospitals with minimum versus the median-above-minimum mortality difference, while accounting for home-to-hospital distances.
Results: The study included 76 376 patients; 5.1% were Blackpatients. Black and White patients were admitted to similar mortality hospitals (3.1% versus 3.1%; P=0.07), but Black patients lived closer to lower-mortality hospitals than White patients (mean hospital mortality within median travel distance, 2.5% versus 2.7%; P<0.001). Black patients were treated less often at the lowest-mortality hospitals overall and within the median travel distance (10.5% versus 13.9% and 37.4% versus 45.1%; P<0.001 for both). In conditional logit models, the Black-White risk ratio of using hospitals with median versus lowest mortality was 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.98-1.06]; P=0.18) in models including only race and hospital mortality; 1.07 ([95% CI, 1.01-1.13]; P<0.001) in models adding home-to-hospital distances; and 1.06 ([95% CI, 0.96-1.16]; P=0.11) in models also accounting for physician-hospital ties.
Conclusions: Despite the improvement of previously described disparities in the quality of hospitals treating Black and White patients, Black patients remain less likely to undergo CABG at their lowest available mortality hospitals, possibly due to suboptimal physician referrals.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.