{"title":"甲状腺结节低回声晕的厚度与甲状腺癌之间的关系:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Weizhen Shi , Ming Zhang , Weiyi Tang , Kui Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The association between hypoechoic halos and thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodules remains a contentious issue. The objective of this study was to examine the potential correlation between the thickness of hypoechoic halos and the presence of thyroid cancer in individuals with thyroid nodules.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 320 patients with thyroid nodules presenting hypoechoic halos from January 2019 to December 2022. Logistic regression models, both univariate and multivariate, were applied to investigate the association between hypoechoic halo thickness and thyroid cancer, with adjustments for potential confounding variables. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted to assess the influence of demographic and tumor-specific characteristics, such as age, sex, halo thickness, tumor size, and tumor location, on the relationship between halo thickness and thyroid cancer risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjusting for multiple covariates, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of thyroid cancer for participants with a halo thickness ≥1 mm were 3.99 (2.4–6.62), 3.73 (2.09–6.67), and 3.16 (1.61–6.19), compared to those with a thickness <1 mm. The association between thyroid cancer and the thickness of the halo remained stable across different subgroups (all P for interaction > 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the hypoechoic halo in nodules for diagnosing thyroid cancer was 0.821 (95% CI: 0.774–0.868), with the highest sensitivity and specificity observed at a thickness cutoff value of 1.29 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our single-center study on adults reveals a positive correlation between halo thickness and thyroid cancer risk, indicating that halo thickness may potentially serve as a valuable predictor for thyroid cancer incidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 1906-1917"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between the Thickness of the Hypoechoic Halo of Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Weizhen Shi , Ming Zhang , Weiyi Tang , Kui Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The association between hypoechoic halos and thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodules remains a contentious issue. The objective of this study was to examine the potential correlation between the thickness of hypoechoic halos and the presence of thyroid cancer in individuals with thyroid nodules.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 320 patients with thyroid nodules presenting hypoechoic halos from January 2019 to December 2022. Logistic regression models, both univariate and multivariate, were applied to investigate the association between hypoechoic halo thickness and thyroid cancer, with adjustments for potential confounding variables. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted to assess the influence of demographic and tumor-specific characteristics, such as age, sex, halo thickness, tumor size, and tumor location, on the relationship between halo thickness and thyroid cancer risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjusting for multiple covariates, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of thyroid cancer for participants with a halo thickness ≥1 mm were 3.99 (2.4–6.62), 3.73 (2.09–6.67), and 3.16 (1.61–6.19), compared to those with a thickness <1 mm. The association between thyroid cancer and the thickness of the halo remained stable across different subgroups (all P for interaction > 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the hypoechoic halo in nodules for diagnosing thyroid cancer was 0.821 (95% CI: 0.774–0.868), with the highest sensitivity and specificity observed at a thickness cutoff value of 1.29 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our single-center study on adults reveals a positive correlation between halo thickness and thyroid cancer risk, indicating that halo thickness may potentially serve as a valuable predictor for thyroid cancer incidence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1906-1917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224009577\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224009577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Association Between the Thickness of the Hypoechoic Halo of Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Study
Rationale and Objectives
The association between hypoechoic halos and thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodules remains a contentious issue. The objective of this study was to examine the potential correlation between the thickness of hypoechoic halos and the presence of thyroid cancer in individuals with thyroid nodules.
Methods
The study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 320 patients with thyroid nodules presenting hypoechoic halos from January 2019 to December 2022. Logistic regression models, both univariate and multivariate, were applied to investigate the association between hypoechoic halo thickness and thyroid cancer, with adjustments for potential confounding variables. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted to assess the influence of demographic and tumor-specific characteristics, such as age, sex, halo thickness, tumor size, and tumor location, on the relationship between halo thickness and thyroid cancer risk.
Results
After adjusting for multiple covariates, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of thyroid cancer for participants with a halo thickness ≥1 mm were 3.99 (2.4–6.62), 3.73 (2.09–6.67), and 3.16 (1.61–6.19), compared to those with a thickness <1 mm. The association between thyroid cancer and the thickness of the halo remained stable across different subgroups (all P for interaction > 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the hypoechoic halo in nodules for diagnosing thyroid cancer was 0.821 (95% CI: 0.774–0.868), with the highest sensitivity and specificity observed at a thickness cutoff value of 1.29 mm.
Conclusion
Our single-center study on adults reveals a positive correlation between halo thickness and thyroid cancer risk, indicating that halo thickness may potentially serve as a valuable predictor for thyroid cancer incidence.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.