血管加压素在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术中作为血管收缩和子宫扩张药物的疗效的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_23
Amrita Balachandran, R K Mishra, A Ouma Effie, Akshay Raghunathan, Anoopa Mathew, S Archana
{"title":"血管加压素在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术中作为血管收缩和子宫扩张药物的疗效的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Amrita Balachandran, R K Mishra, A Ouma Effie, Akshay Raghunathan, Anoopa Mathew, S Archana","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic myomectomy is a commonly performed operation with fast recovery and excellent results. However, haemorrhagic nature of the operation mandates us to use variety of vasoconstrictive and uterotonic agents. Amongst which, one of them is vasopressin. It is a synthetic antidiuretic hormone analogue which has been in common use as a vasoconstrictive agent in various surgical procedures including laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials published from 2013 to 2023 (10 years) comparing the use of vasopressin against other drug or placebo or different doses of vasopressin was performed. The outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, difference in the haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 176 articles through the study search, amongst which 12 articles were included for the meta-analysis. There was a significant heterogeneity in the studies with moderate risk of bias in eight studies and low risk of bias in four studies. Compared to placebo, vasopressin showed significantly lower odds need of blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.61, P = 0.002) and significantly lower pre-post fall in Hb (OR -3.12, 95% CI: -4.63--1.60, P < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (OR -0.56 (95% CI: -2.04-0.92, P = 0.46) and pre-post fall in Hct (OR -0.94, 95% CI: -1.96-0.07, P > 0.05). Compared to other drug (epinephrine, misoprostol and octreotide acetate), vasopressin showed no significant superiority in controlling blood loss ( P > 0.05). Even the two doses of vasopressin (dilute vs. concentrated) showed no statistically significant difference between surgical blood loss and need for blood transfusion ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vasopressin is an efficacious drug to be used for controlling blood loss, decreasing blood transfusion requirement and maintaining Hb and Hct during laparoscopic myomectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":"20 4","pages":"363-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy of vasopressin as a vasoconstrictive and uterotonic drug in laparoscopic myomectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Amrita Balachandran, R K Mishra, A Ouma Effie, Akshay Raghunathan, Anoopa Mathew, S Archana\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic myomectomy is a commonly performed operation with fast recovery and excellent results. However, haemorrhagic nature of the operation mandates us to use variety of vasoconstrictive and uterotonic agents. Amongst which, one of them is vasopressin. It is a synthetic antidiuretic hormone analogue which has been in common use as a vasoconstrictive agent in various surgical procedures including laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials published from 2013 to 2023 (10 years) comparing the use of vasopressin against other drug or placebo or different doses of vasopressin was performed. The outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, difference in the haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 176 articles through the study search, amongst which 12 articles were included for the meta-analysis. There was a significant heterogeneity in the studies with moderate risk of bias in eight studies and low risk of bias in four studies. Compared to placebo, vasopressin showed significantly lower odds need of blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.61, P = 0.002) and significantly lower pre-post fall in Hb (OR -3.12, 95% CI: -4.63--1.60, P < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (OR -0.56 (95% CI: -2.04-0.92, P = 0.46) and pre-post fall in Hct (OR -0.94, 95% CI: -1.96-0.07, P > 0.05). Compared to other drug (epinephrine, misoprostol and octreotide acetate), vasopressin showed no significant superiority in controlling blood loss ( P > 0.05). Even the two doses of vasopressin (dilute vs. concentrated) showed no statistically significant difference between surgical blood loss and need for blood transfusion ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vasopressin is an efficacious drug to be used for controlling blood loss, decreasing blood transfusion requirement and maintaining Hb and Hct during laparoscopic myomectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"363-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术是一种常用的手术,恢复快,效果好。然而,手术的出血性质要求我们使用各种血管收缩和子宫收缩剂。其中之一就是抗利尿激素。它是一种合成的抗利尿激素类似物,在包括腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术在内的各种外科手术中作为血管收缩剂被广泛使用。方法:对2013年至2023年(10年)发表的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析,比较抗利尿激素与其他药物或安慰剂或不同剂量抗利尿激素的使用。结果测量术中出血量、输血需求、血红蛋白(Hb)和红细胞压积(Hct)差异。结果:我们通过研究检索确定了176篇文章,其中12篇文章被纳入meta分析。8项研究存在中等偏倚风险,4项研究存在低偏倚风险,存在显著的异质性。与安慰剂相比,抗利尿激素显示输血需要的几率显著降低(比值比[OR] 0.28, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.13-0.61, P = 0.002), Hb下降前后显著降低(比值比[OR] -3.12, 95% CI: -4.63—1.60,P < 0.0001)。然而,术中出血量(OR -0.56 (95% CI: -2.04-0.92, P = 0.46)和Hct术前术后下降(OR -0.94, 95% CI: -1.96-0.07, P < 0.05)差异无统计学意义。与其他药物(肾上腺素、米索前列醇、醋酸奥曲肽)相比,加压素在控制失血量方面无显著优势(P < 0.05)。即使两种剂量的加压素(稀释与浓缩)在手术失血量和输血需要量之间也没有统计学差异(P < 0.05)。结论:加压素是腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术中控制出血量、降低输血需要量、维持Hb和Hct的有效药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy of vasopressin as a vasoconstrictive and uterotonic drug in laparoscopic myomectomy.

Introduction: Laparoscopic myomectomy is a commonly performed operation with fast recovery and excellent results. However, haemorrhagic nature of the operation mandates us to use variety of vasoconstrictive and uterotonic agents. Amongst which, one of them is vasopressin. It is a synthetic antidiuretic hormone analogue which has been in common use as a vasoconstrictive agent in various surgical procedures including laparoscopic myomectomy.

Methods: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials published from 2013 to 2023 (10 years) comparing the use of vasopressin against other drug or placebo or different doses of vasopressin was performed. The outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, difference in the haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct).

Results: We identified 176 articles through the study search, amongst which 12 articles were included for the meta-analysis. There was a significant heterogeneity in the studies with moderate risk of bias in eight studies and low risk of bias in four studies. Compared to placebo, vasopressin showed significantly lower odds need of blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.61, P = 0.002) and significantly lower pre-post fall in Hb (OR -3.12, 95% CI: -4.63--1.60, P < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (OR -0.56 (95% CI: -2.04-0.92, P = 0.46) and pre-post fall in Hct (OR -0.94, 95% CI: -1.96-0.07, P > 0.05). Compared to other drug (epinephrine, misoprostol and octreotide acetate), vasopressin showed no significant superiority in controlling blood loss ( P > 0.05). Even the two doses of vasopressin (dilute vs. concentrated) showed no statistically significant difference between surgical blood loss and need for blood transfusion ( P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Vasopressin is an efficacious drug to be used for controlling blood loss, decreasing blood transfusion requirement and maintaining Hb and Hct during laparoscopic myomectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信