低剂量溶栓、超声辅助溶栓或肝素治疗中高风险肺栓塞的随机试验——STRATIFY试验:设计和统计分析计划。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08688-4
Jesper Kjærgaard, Jørn Carlsen, Emilie Sonne-Holm, Sebastian Wiberg, Lene Holmvang, Jens Flensted Lassen, Rikke Sørensen, Dan Høfsten, Peter Sommer Ulriksen, Samir Jawad, Pernille Palm, Jens Jakob Thune, Christian Hassager, Ole P Kristiansen, Kristian Eskesen, Søren Fanø, Lia E Bang
{"title":"低剂量溶栓、超声辅助溶栓或肝素治疗中高风险肺栓塞的随机试验——STRATIFY试验:设计和统计分析计划。","authors":"Jesper Kjærgaard, Jørn Carlsen, Emilie Sonne-Holm, Sebastian Wiberg, Lene Holmvang, Jens Flensted Lassen, Rikke Sørensen, Dan Høfsten, Peter Sommer Ulriksen, Samir Jawad, Pernille Palm, Jens Jakob Thune, Christian Hassager, Ole P Kristiansen, Kristian Eskesen, Søren Fanø, Lia E Bang","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08688-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a significant risk of hemodynamic deterioration or death. Treatment should balance efficacy in reducing clot burden with the risk of complications, particularly bleeding. Previous studies on high-dose, short-term thrombolysis with alteplase (rtPA) showed a reduced risk of hemodynamic deterioration but no change in mortality and increased bleeding complications. Catheter-based techniques, including ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), and low-dose thrombolysis may offer reasonable efficacy with lower risk. However, studies comparing these methods have been few. This trial aims to address this gap by randomizing patients to three treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, randomized trial with 1:1:1 allocation of 210 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE, excluding those with absolute contraindications to thrombolysis. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are > 18 years of age, have had symptoms < 14 days, and are able to give informed consent. Patients are allocated 1:1:1 into three treatment strategies: (1) unfractionated heparin (UFH)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), (2) UFH/LMWH + 20 mg rtPA/6 h intravenously (IV), or (3) UFH + 20 mg rtPA/6 h via USAT. Co-primary outcomes include reduction in clot burden as assessed by refined Miller score from pre-treatment to follow-up (48-96 h) computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) comparing low-dose rtPA (± USAT) groups to UFH/LMWH group (p < 0.01, N = 210) and reduction in refined Miller score on follow-up CT angiography comparing low-dose rtPA by USAT to intravenous rtPA, p < 0.04, N = 140). Secondary outcomes comprise bleeding complications, duration of index admission, FiO<sub>2</sub>, blood pressure, respiratory and heart rate at the time of follow-up CT angiography, mortality in the three groups, incidence of tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient < 40 mmHg at 3 months follow-up echocardiography, 6-min walk test at 3 months comparing the three groups, and health-related quality of life at 3 months follow-up comparing the three groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We hypothesize that in patients with intermediate-high risk PE (1) administration of 20 mg rtPA leads to a greater reduction in clot burden compared to heparins and (2) administration of 20 mg rtPA via USAT results in a greater reduction in clot burden compared to 20 mg rtPA intravenous.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04088292. Registered in September 2019 (retrospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized trial of low-dose thrombolysis, ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis, or heparin for intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism-the STRATIFY trial: design and statistical analysis plan.\",\"authors\":\"Jesper Kjærgaard, Jørn Carlsen, Emilie Sonne-Holm, Sebastian Wiberg, Lene Holmvang, Jens Flensted Lassen, Rikke Sørensen, Dan Høfsten, Peter Sommer Ulriksen, Samir Jawad, Pernille Palm, Jens Jakob Thune, Christian Hassager, Ole P Kristiansen, Kristian Eskesen, Søren Fanø, Lia E Bang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08688-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a significant risk of hemodynamic deterioration or death. Treatment should balance efficacy in reducing clot burden with the risk of complications, particularly bleeding. Previous studies on high-dose, short-term thrombolysis with alteplase (rtPA) showed a reduced risk of hemodynamic deterioration but no change in mortality and increased bleeding complications. Catheter-based techniques, including ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), and low-dose thrombolysis may offer reasonable efficacy with lower risk. However, studies comparing these methods have been few. This trial aims to address this gap by randomizing patients to three treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, randomized trial with 1:1:1 allocation of 210 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE, excluding those with absolute contraindications to thrombolysis. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are > 18 years of age, have had symptoms < 14 days, and are able to give informed consent. Patients are allocated 1:1:1 into three treatment strategies: (1) unfractionated heparin (UFH)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), (2) UFH/LMWH + 20 mg rtPA/6 h intravenously (IV), or (3) UFH + 20 mg rtPA/6 h via USAT. Co-primary outcomes include reduction in clot burden as assessed by refined Miller score from pre-treatment to follow-up (48-96 h) computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) comparing low-dose rtPA (± USAT) groups to UFH/LMWH group (p < 0.01, N = 210) and reduction in refined Miller score on follow-up CT angiography comparing low-dose rtPA by USAT to intravenous rtPA, p < 0.04, N = 140). Secondary outcomes comprise bleeding complications, duration of index admission, FiO<sub>2</sub>, blood pressure, respiratory and heart rate at the time of follow-up CT angiography, mortality in the three groups, incidence of tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient < 40 mmHg at 3 months follow-up echocardiography, 6-min walk test at 3 months comparing the three groups, and health-related quality of life at 3 months follow-up comparing the three groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We hypothesize that in patients with intermediate-high risk PE (1) administration of 20 mg rtPA leads to a greater reduction in clot burden compared to heparins and (2) administration of 20 mg rtPA via USAT results in a greater reduction in clot burden compared to 20 mg rtPA intravenous.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04088292. Registered in September 2019 (retrospectively registered).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08688-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08688-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中高危肺栓塞(PE)具有显著的血流动力学恶化或死亡风险。治疗应平衡减少血块负担的效果和并发症的风险,特别是出血。先前对阿替普酶(rtPA)大剂量短期溶栓的研究显示,血液动力学恶化的风险降低,但死亡率和出血并发症的增加没有变化。基于导管的技术,包括超声辅助溶栓(USAT)和低剂量溶栓可以提供合理的疗效和较低的风险。然而,比较这些方法的研究很少。该试验旨在通过将患者随机分配到三种治疗方式来解决这一差距。方法:210例急性中高危PE患者,不包括有溶栓绝对禁忌症的患者,采用多中心、1:1分配的随机试验。符合纳入条件的患者为:年龄≥18岁,随访CT血管造影时有症状2、血压、呼吸和心率、三组死亡率、三尖瓣反流发生率、压力梯度我们假设,在中高危PE患者中(1)与肝素相比,给予20mg rtPA可更大程度地减轻血栓负担;(2)与静脉注射20mg rtPA相比,通过USAT给予20mg rtPA可更大程度地减轻血栓负担。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04088292。2019年9月注册(追溯注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A randomized trial of low-dose thrombolysis, ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis, or heparin for intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism-the STRATIFY trial: design and statistical analysis plan.

Background: Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a significant risk of hemodynamic deterioration or death. Treatment should balance efficacy in reducing clot burden with the risk of complications, particularly bleeding. Previous studies on high-dose, short-term thrombolysis with alteplase (rtPA) showed a reduced risk of hemodynamic deterioration but no change in mortality and increased bleeding complications. Catheter-based techniques, including ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), and low-dose thrombolysis may offer reasonable efficacy with lower risk. However, studies comparing these methods have been few. This trial aims to address this gap by randomizing patients to three treatment modalities.

Methods: Multicenter, randomized trial with 1:1:1 allocation of 210 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE, excluding those with absolute contraindications to thrombolysis. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are > 18 years of age, have had symptoms < 14 days, and are able to give informed consent. Patients are allocated 1:1:1 into three treatment strategies: (1) unfractionated heparin (UFH)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), (2) UFH/LMWH + 20 mg rtPA/6 h intravenously (IV), or (3) UFH + 20 mg rtPA/6 h via USAT. Co-primary outcomes include reduction in clot burden as assessed by refined Miller score from pre-treatment to follow-up (48-96 h) computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) comparing low-dose rtPA (± USAT) groups to UFH/LMWH group (p < 0.01, N = 210) and reduction in refined Miller score on follow-up CT angiography comparing low-dose rtPA by USAT to intravenous rtPA, p < 0.04, N = 140). Secondary outcomes comprise bleeding complications, duration of index admission, FiO2, blood pressure, respiratory and heart rate at the time of follow-up CT angiography, mortality in the three groups, incidence of tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient < 40 mmHg at 3 months follow-up echocardiography, 6-min walk test at 3 months comparing the three groups, and health-related quality of life at 3 months follow-up comparing the three groups.

Discussion: We hypothesize that in patients with intermediate-high risk PE (1) administration of 20 mg rtPA leads to a greater reduction in clot burden compared to heparins and (2) administration of 20 mg rtPA via USAT results in a greater reduction in clot burden compared to 20 mg rtPA intravenous.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04088292. Registered in September 2019 (retrospectively registered).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信