基于价值的医学在慢性盆腔疼痛中的实际应用:一项定性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M. C. Wissing, S. E. I. van der Wal, M. van de Haterd, P. R. de Reuver, L. Dick, Y. Engels, K. C. P. Vissers, K. B. Kluivers, K. J. B. Notten
{"title":"基于价值的医学在慢性盆腔疼痛中的实际应用:一项定性研究。","authors":"M. C. Wissing,&nbsp;S. E. I. van der Wal,&nbsp;M. van de Haterd,&nbsp;P. R. de Reuver,&nbsp;L. Dick,&nbsp;Y. Engels,&nbsp;K. C. P. Vissers,&nbsp;K. B. Kluivers,&nbsp;K. J. B. Notten","doi":"10.1111/jep.14295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is prevalent and a complex multifactorial condition. The incidence is rising. CPPS patients may benefit from multidisciplinary care in a structured care pathway.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this explorative study is to give an overview of patient and healthcare provider perspectives on the current patient journey to implement these perspectives in a CPPS care pathway.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A Qualitative study was performed using nominal group technique. The participants were nine female patients CPPS and fourteen healthcare providers involved in CPPS care. The perspectives of the stakeholder groups on the individual components of the CPPS patient journey were collected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five overarching key topics were identified: structured start of the patient journey, execution of the patient journey, follow-up after the patient journey, administration during the patient journey, and communication and education. The following recommendations were formulated based on the prioritised points: implementation of a multidisciplinary approach from the start of the journey, adding a case manager and expanding the multidisciplinary team, providing a collaborative triage, updating the questionnaires, improving communication, developing a rehabilitation programme, and reducing waiting times.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Stakeholder focus groups using the nominal group technique was a pivotal step in the development of our CPPS care pathway. This step led to fundamental recommendations, of which a personalised treatment plan at an earlier stage in the patient journey might be the most impactful. This is now implemented, and we monitor the effects on outcomes, quality of life and patient's satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Application of Value-Based Medicine in Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. C. Wissing,&nbsp;S. E. I. van der Wal,&nbsp;M. van de Haterd,&nbsp;P. R. de Reuver,&nbsp;L. Dick,&nbsp;Y. Engels,&nbsp;K. C. P. Vissers,&nbsp;K. B. Kluivers,&nbsp;K. J. B. Notten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is prevalent and a complex multifactorial condition. The incidence is rising. CPPS patients may benefit from multidisciplinary care in a structured care pathway.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this explorative study is to give an overview of patient and healthcare provider perspectives on the current patient journey to implement these perspectives in a CPPS care pathway.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A Qualitative study was performed using nominal group technique. The participants were nine female patients CPPS and fourteen healthcare providers involved in CPPS care. The perspectives of the stakeholder groups on the individual components of the CPPS patient journey were collected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five overarching key topics were identified: structured start of the patient journey, execution of the patient journey, follow-up after the patient journey, administration during the patient journey, and communication and education. The following recommendations were formulated based on the prioritised points: implementation of a multidisciplinary approach from the start of the journey, adding a case manager and expanding the multidisciplinary team, providing a collaborative triage, updating the questionnaires, improving communication, developing a rehabilitation programme, and reducing waiting times.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stakeholder focus groups using the nominal group technique was a pivotal step in the development of our CPPS care pathway. This step led to fundamental recommendations, of which a personalised treatment plan at an earlier stage in the patient journey might be the most impactful. This is now implemented, and we monitor the effects on outcomes, quality of life and patient's satisfaction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:慢性骨盆疼痛综合征(CPPS)是一种普遍且复杂的多因素疾病。发病率正在上升。CPPS患者可能受益于结构化护理途径中的多学科护理。目的和目标:本探索性研究的目的是概述患者和医疗保健提供者对当前患者旅程的观点,以便在CPPS护理路径中实现这些观点。方法:采用名义分组法进行定性研究。参与者为9名女性CPPS患者和14名参与CPPS护理的医疗保健提供者。收集了利益相关者团体对CPPS患者旅程各个组成部分的观点。结果:确定了五个主要的关键主题:患者旅程的结构化开始,患者旅程的执行,患者旅程后的随访,患者旅程中的管理以及沟通和教育。根据优先事项制定了以下建议:从旅程开始就实施多学科方法,增加病例管理人员并扩大多学科团队,提供协作分类,更新问卷,改善沟通,制定康复方案,缩短等待时间。结论:使用名义小组技术的利益相关者焦点小组是我们CPPS护理途径发展的关键一步。这一步骤产生了一些基本建议,其中在患者早期阶段制定个性化治疗计划可能是最有影响力的。这是现在实施,我们监测对结果,生活质量和患者满意度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Practical Application of Value-Based Medicine in Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Qualitative Study

Practical Application of Value-Based Medicine in Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Qualitative Study

Rationale

Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is prevalent and a complex multifactorial condition. The incidence is rising. CPPS patients may benefit from multidisciplinary care in a structured care pathway.

Aim and Objectives

The aim of this explorative study is to give an overview of patient and healthcare provider perspectives on the current patient journey to implement these perspectives in a CPPS care pathway.

Methods

A Qualitative study was performed using nominal group technique. The participants were nine female patients CPPS and fourteen healthcare providers involved in CPPS care. The perspectives of the stakeholder groups on the individual components of the CPPS patient journey were collected.

Results

Five overarching key topics were identified: structured start of the patient journey, execution of the patient journey, follow-up after the patient journey, administration during the patient journey, and communication and education. The following recommendations were formulated based on the prioritised points: implementation of a multidisciplinary approach from the start of the journey, adding a case manager and expanding the multidisciplinary team, providing a collaborative triage, updating the questionnaires, improving communication, developing a rehabilitation programme, and reducing waiting times.

Conclusion

Stakeholder focus groups using the nominal group technique was a pivotal step in the development of our CPPS care pathway. This step led to fundamental recommendations, of which a personalised treatment plan at an earlier stage in the patient journey might be the most impactful. This is now implemented, and we monitor the effects on outcomes, quality of life and patient's satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信