提高护生新生儿复苏学习效果:人工智能辅助护理计划学习与传统教学比较的准实验研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Birsel Molu
{"title":"提高护生新生儿复苏学习效果:人工智能辅助护理计划学习与传统教学比较的准实验研究","authors":"Birsel Molu","doi":"10.1111/jep.14286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based care plan learning strategy with standard training techniques in order to determine how it affects nursing students' learning results in newborn resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy third-year nursing students from a state university in Türkiye participated in the study. They were split into two groups: the experimental group, which received care plans based on AI, and the control group, which received traditional instruction. The control group underwent traditional training consisting of lectures and skill demonstrations, while the experimental group underwent 4 weeks of training utilising an AI-based care plan learning approach. Neonatal resuscitation knowledge tests and student information questionnaires were used for pre- and post-test assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared to the control group, the AI-based care plan group demonstrated noticeably greater learning achievement in newborn resuscitation. While the two groups' pre-test results were comparable, the AI-based education group's post-test results were noticeably higher than those of the traditional education group. Furthermore, most of the students had favourable opinions on AI applications and acknowledged their advantages for the nursing field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study's conclusions highlight the benefits of incorporating AI technology into nursing education and highlight how it might improve student learning outcomes for vital competencies like newborn resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"e14286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Quasi-Experimental Study Comparing AI-Assisted Care Plan Learning With Traditional Instruction.\",\"authors\":\"Birsel Molu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based care plan learning strategy with standard training techniques in order to determine how it affects nursing students' learning results in newborn resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy third-year nursing students from a state university in Türkiye participated in the study. They were split into two groups: the experimental group, which received care plans based on AI, and the control group, which received traditional instruction. The control group underwent traditional training consisting of lectures and skill demonstrations, while the experimental group underwent 4 weeks of training utilising an AI-based care plan learning approach. Neonatal resuscitation knowledge tests and student information questionnaires were used for pre- and post-test assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared to the control group, the AI-based care plan group demonstrated noticeably greater learning achievement in newborn resuscitation. While the two groups' pre-test results were comparable, the AI-based education group's post-test results were noticeably higher than those of the traditional education group. Furthermore, most of the students had favourable opinions on AI applications and acknowledged their advantages for the nursing field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study's conclusions highlight the benefits of incorporating AI technology into nursing education and highlight how it might improve student learning outcomes for vital competencies like newborn resuscitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"e14286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较基于人工智能(AI)的护理计划学习策略与标准培训技术的效果,以确定其如何影响护生在新生儿复苏中的学习结果。方法:选取基耶州某州立大学护理专业大三学生73名。他们被分为两组:实验组接受基于人工智能的护理计划,对照组接受传统的指导。对照组接受由讲座和技能演示组成的传统培训,而实验组则采用基于人工智能的护理计划学习方法进行为期4周的培训。新生儿复苏知识测试和学生信息问卷用于测试前和测试后的评估。结果:与对照组相比,人工智能护理方案组在新生儿复苏方面的学习成绩显著提高。虽然两组的前测结果相当,但人工智能教育组的后测结果明显高于传统教育组。此外,大多数学生对人工智能的应用持积极态度,并承认人工智能在护理领域的优势。结论:该研究的结论强调了将人工智能技术纳入护理教育的好处,并强调了它如何改善学生在新生儿复苏等重要能力方面的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Quasi-Experimental Study Comparing AI-Assisted Care Plan Learning With Traditional Instruction.

Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based care plan learning strategy with standard training techniques in order to determine how it affects nursing students' learning results in newborn resuscitation.

Methods: Seventy third-year nursing students from a state university in Türkiye participated in the study. They were split into two groups: the experimental group, which received care plans based on AI, and the control group, which received traditional instruction. The control group underwent traditional training consisting of lectures and skill demonstrations, while the experimental group underwent 4 weeks of training utilising an AI-based care plan learning approach. Neonatal resuscitation knowledge tests and student information questionnaires were used for pre- and post-test assessments.

Results: When compared to the control group, the AI-based care plan group demonstrated noticeably greater learning achievement in newborn resuscitation. While the two groups' pre-test results were comparable, the AI-based education group's post-test results were noticeably higher than those of the traditional education group. Furthermore, most of the students had favourable opinions on AI applications and acknowledged their advantages for the nursing field.

Conclusion: The study's conclusions highlight the benefits of incorporating AI technology into nursing education and highlight how it might improve student learning outcomes for vital competencies like newborn resuscitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信