肺脏损伤动物容积造影无创评估PaCO2:一种人工智能方法

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gerardo Tusman, Adriana G Scandurra, Stephan H Böhm, Noelia I Echeverría, Gustavo Meschino, P Kremeier, Fernando Suarez Sipmann
{"title":"肺脏损伤动物容积造影无创评估PaCO2:一种人工智能方法","authors":"Gerardo Tusman, Adriana G Scandurra, Stephan H Böhm, Noelia I Echeverría, Gustavo Meschino, P Kremeier, Fernando Suarez Sipmann","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01253-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the feasibility of non-invasively estimating the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) using a computational Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography (VCap) parameters. In 14 lung-lavaged pigs, we continuously measured PaCO<sub>2</sub> with an optical intravascular catheter and VCap on a breath-by-breath basis. Animals were mechanically ventilated with fixed settings and subjected to 0 to 22 cmH<sub>2</sub>O of positive end-expiratory pressure steps. The resultant 8599 pairs of data points - one PaCO<sub>2</sub> value matched with twelve Vcap and ventilatory parameters derived in one breath - fed the ANFIS model. The data was separated into 7370 data points for training the model (85%) and 1229 for testing (15%). The ANFIS analysis was repeated 10 independent times, randomly mixing the total data points. Bland-Altman plot (accuracy and precision), root mean square error (quality of prediction) and four-quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes (trending ability) between reference and estimated PaCO<sub>2</sub> were analyzed. The Bland-Altman plot performed in 10 independent tested ANFIS models showed a mean bias between reference and estimated PaCO<sub>2</sub> of 0.03 ± 0.03 mmHg, with limits of agreement of 2.25 ± 0.42 mmHg, and a root mean square error of 1.15 ± 0.06 mmHg. A good trending ability was confirmed by four quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes of 95.5% and 94.3%, respectively. In an animal lung injury model, the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography parameters can estimate PaCO<sub>2</sub> with high accuracy, acceptable precision, and good trending ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive estimation of PaCO<sub>2</sub> from volumetric capnography in animals with injured lungs: an Artificial Intelligence approach.\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo Tusman, Adriana G Scandurra, Stephan H Böhm, Noelia I Echeverría, Gustavo Meschino, P Kremeier, Fernando Suarez Sipmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01253-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To investigate the feasibility of non-invasively estimating the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) using a computational Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography (VCap) parameters. In 14 lung-lavaged pigs, we continuously measured PaCO<sub>2</sub> with an optical intravascular catheter and VCap on a breath-by-breath basis. Animals were mechanically ventilated with fixed settings and subjected to 0 to 22 cmH<sub>2</sub>O of positive end-expiratory pressure steps. The resultant 8599 pairs of data points - one PaCO<sub>2</sub> value matched with twelve Vcap and ventilatory parameters derived in one breath - fed the ANFIS model. The data was separated into 7370 data points for training the model (85%) and 1229 for testing (15%). The ANFIS analysis was repeated 10 independent times, randomly mixing the total data points. Bland-Altman plot (accuracy and precision), root mean square error (quality of prediction) and four-quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes (trending ability) between reference and estimated PaCO<sub>2</sub> were analyzed. The Bland-Altman plot performed in 10 independent tested ANFIS models showed a mean bias between reference and estimated PaCO<sub>2</sub> of 0.03 ± 0.03 mmHg, with limits of agreement of 2.25 ± 0.42 mmHg, and a root mean square error of 1.15 ± 0.06 mmHg. A good trending ability was confirmed by four quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes of 95.5% and 94.3%, respectively. In an animal lung injury model, the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography parameters can estimate PaCO<sub>2</sub> with high accuracy, acceptable precision, and good trending ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01253-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01253-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨基于无创容积造影(VCap)参数的计算自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)模型无创估算动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)的可行性。在14只肺灌洗的猪中,我们使用光学血管内导管和VCap连续测量PaCO2,以逐呼吸为基础。动物以固定设置机械通气,并承受0至22 cmH2O的呼气末正压步骤。所得的8599对数据点——一个PaCO2值与一次呼吸中得到的12个Vcap和通气参数相匹配——为ANFIS模型提供了数据。数据被分成7370个数据点用于训练模型(85%)和1229个数据点用于测试(15%)。ANFIS分析独立重复10次,随机混合总数据点。分析参考PaCO2与估计PaCO2之间的Bland-Altman图(准确度和精密度)、均方根误差(预测质量)以及四象限图和极坐标图的一致性指数(趋势能力)。在10个独立测试的ANFIS模型中进行的Bland-Altman图显示,参考PaCO2与估计PaCO2之间的平均偏差为0.03±0.03 mmHg,一致性限为2.25±0.42 mmHg,均方根误差为1.15±0.06 mmHg。四象限图和极坐标图的一致性指数分别为95.5%和94.3%,具有较好的趋势化能力。在动物肺损伤模型中,基于无创容积肺脏造影参数的自适应神经模糊推理系统模型能较好地估计PaCO2,具有较高的准确性、可接受的精度和较好的趋势能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive estimation of PaCO2 from volumetric capnography in animals with injured lungs: an Artificial Intelligence approach.

To investigate the feasibility of non-invasively estimating the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) using a computational Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography (VCap) parameters. In 14 lung-lavaged pigs, we continuously measured PaCO2 with an optical intravascular catheter and VCap on a breath-by-breath basis. Animals were mechanically ventilated with fixed settings and subjected to 0 to 22 cmH2O of positive end-expiratory pressure steps. The resultant 8599 pairs of data points - one PaCO2 value matched with twelve Vcap and ventilatory parameters derived in one breath - fed the ANFIS model. The data was separated into 7370 data points for training the model (85%) and 1229 for testing (15%). The ANFIS analysis was repeated 10 independent times, randomly mixing the total data points. Bland-Altman plot (accuracy and precision), root mean square error (quality of prediction) and four-quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes (trending ability) between reference and estimated PaCO2 were analyzed. The Bland-Altman plot performed in 10 independent tested ANFIS models showed a mean bias between reference and estimated PaCO2 of 0.03 ± 0.03 mmHg, with limits of agreement of 2.25 ± 0.42 mmHg, and a root mean square error of 1.15 ± 0.06 mmHg. A good trending ability was confirmed by four quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes of 95.5% and 94.3%, respectively. In an animal lung injury model, the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography parameters can estimate PaCO2 with high accuracy, acceptable precision, and good trending ability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信