哪种氟喹诺酮与贝达喹啉联合治疗结核病更安全:来自2013 - 2024年FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的证据

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1491921
Sheng Wei, Changping He, Xiangping Xie, Anping Zhang, Simin Tang, Sha Li, Yanlang He
{"title":"哪种氟喹诺酮与贝达喹啉联合治疗结核病更安全:来自2013 - 2024年FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的证据","authors":"Sheng Wei, Changping He, Xiangping Xie, Anping Zhang, Simin Tang, Sha Li, Yanlang He","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2024.1491921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate which fluoroquinolone is safer when combined with bedaquiline for tuberculosis treatment by using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to the second quarter (Q4) of 2024 from the FDA FAERS database for disproportionality analysis. Signal detection was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 12, 303, 879 reports from the FAERS database, including 722 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and levofloxacin (with 2,723 adverse events) and 573 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and moxifloxacin (with 2,233 adverse events). For the bedaquiline-levofloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 100 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 128, ROR 5.79, PRR 5.56, IC 2.48, EBGM 5.56), blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 217, ROR 5.04, PRR 4.72, IC 2.24, EBGM 4.71), and metabolism and nutrition disorders (n = 185, ROR 3.44, PRR 3.27, IC 1.71, EBGM 3.27). In terms of PTs, the three strongest signals were portal fibrosis (ROR 330.64), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and toxic optic neuropathy (ROR 238.11). Reports of prolonged QT interval on ECG (125 cases) and anemia (130 cases) were significantly more frequent than other PTs. For the bedaquiline-moxifloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 85 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 141, ROR 7.9, PRR 7.47, IC 2.9, EBGM 7.46), ear and labyrinth disorders (n = 40, ROR 4.03, PRR 3.97, IC 1.99, EBGM 3.97), and cardiac disorders (n = 141, ROR 3.08, PRR 2.95, IC 1.56, EBGM 2.95). The three strongest PT signals were chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), bronchopleural fistula (ROR 314.86), and toxic neuropathy (ROR 187.11). Prolonged QT interval on ECG (152 cases) remained the most frequently reported PT. In both treatment regimens, individuals under 45 years of age experienced a higher frequency and variety of AEs, indicating the need for enhanced monitoring. For those over 45, particular attention should be given to ECG changes, especially in men. Finally, some PTs with extremely high signal strength, such as chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and bronchopleural fistula (ROR 301.24), may represent rare adverse events associated with the combination of bedaquiline-fluoroquinolone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that the safety profile of bedaquiline combined with moxifloxacin does not appear superior to that of bedaquiline combined with levofloxacin in terms of cardiac, hepatic, and neurological effects. Therefore, in the BPaLM regimen, considering the substitution of moxifloxacin with levofloxacin may be worthwhile if their efficacy is proven to be similar. Increased monitoring may be required for individuals under 45 years of age and male MDR-TB patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1491921"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which fluoroquinolone is safer when combined with bedaquiline for tuberculosis treatment: evidence from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2013 to 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Wei, Changping He, Xiangping Xie, Anping Zhang, Simin Tang, Sha Li, Yanlang He\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2024.1491921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate which fluoroquinolone is safer when combined with bedaquiline for tuberculosis treatment by using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to the second quarter (Q4) of 2024 from the FDA FAERS database for disproportionality analysis. Signal detection was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 12, 303, 879 reports from the FAERS database, including 722 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and levofloxacin (with 2,723 adverse events) and 573 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and moxifloxacin (with 2,233 adverse events). For the bedaquiline-levofloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 100 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 128, ROR 5.79, PRR 5.56, IC 2.48, EBGM 5.56), blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 217, ROR 5.04, PRR 4.72, IC 2.24, EBGM 4.71), and metabolism and nutrition disorders (n = 185, ROR 3.44, PRR 3.27, IC 1.71, EBGM 3.27). In terms of PTs, the three strongest signals were portal fibrosis (ROR 330.64), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and toxic optic neuropathy (ROR 238.11). Reports of prolonged QT interval on ECG (125 cases) and anemia (130 cases) were significantly more frequent than other PTs. For the bedaquiline-moxifloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 85 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 141, ROR 7.9, PRR 7.47, IC 2.9, EBGM 7.46), ear and labyrinth disorders (n = 40, ROR 4.03, PRR 3.97, IC 1.99, EBGM 3.97), and cardiac disorders (n = 141, ROR 3.08, PRR 2.95, IC 1.56, EBGM 2.95). The three strongest PT signals were chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), bronchopleural fistula (ROR 314.86), and toxic neuropathy (ROR 187.11). Prolonged QT interval on ECG (152 cases) remained the most frequently reported PT. In both treatment regimens, individuals under 45 years of age experienced a higher frequency and variety of AEs, indicating the need for enhanced monitoring. For those over 45, particular attention should be given to ECG changes, especially in men. Finally, some PTs with extremely high signal strength, such as chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and bronchopleural fistula (ROR 301.24), may represent rare adverse events associated with the combination of bedaquiline-fluoroquinolone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that the safety profile of bedaquiline combined with moxifloxacin does not appear superior to that of bedaquiline combined with levofloxacin in terms of cardiac, hepatic, and neurological effects. Therefore, in the BPaLM regimen, considering the substitution of moxifloxacin with levofloxacin may be worthwhile if their efficacy is proven to be similar. Increased monitoring may be required for individuals under 45 years of age and male MDR-TB patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1491921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1491921\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1491921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,探讨氟喹诺酮类药物与贝达喹啉联合治疗结核病哪种更安全。方法:从FDA FAERS数据库中选取2013年第一季度(Q1)至2024年第二季度(Q4)的数据进行歧化分析。采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)进行信号检测。结果:本研究分析了FAERS数据库中12 303,879例报告,其中贝达喹啉与左氧氟沙星联用报告722例(不良事件2,723例),贝达喹啉与莫西沙星联用报告573例(不良事件2,233例)。对于贝达喹啉-左氧氟沙星方案,这些报告被分类为100个首选术语(PTs)和24个系统器官分类(soc)。最常见的三种soc是肝胆功能障碍(n = 128, ROR 5.79, PRR 5.56, IC 2.48, EBGM 5.56)、血液和淋巴系统功能障碍(n = 217, ROR 5.04, PRR 4.72, IC 2.24, EBGM 4.71)以及代谢和营养功能障碍(n = 185, ROR 3.44, PRR 3.27, IC 1.71, EBGM 3.27)。在PTs方面,三个最强的信号是门脉纤维化(ROR 330.64)、丙型肝炎RNA升高(ROR 301.24)和中毒性视神经病变(ROR 238.11)。心电图QT间期延长125例,贫血130例,明显高于其他pt。对于贝达喹啉-莫西沙星方案,这些报告分为85个首选术语(PTs)和24个系统器官分类(soc)。三种最常见的soc是肝胆疾病(n = 141, ROR 7.9, PRR 7.47, IC 2.9, EBGM 7.46),耳和迷路疾病(n = 40, ROR 4.03, PRR 3.97, IC 1.99, EBGM 3.97)和心脏疾病(n = 141, ROR 3.08, PRR 2.95, IC 1.56, EBGM 2.95)。三个最强的PT信号分别是慢性肾盂肾炎(ROR 563.29)、支气管胸膜瘘(ROR 314.86)和中毒性神经病变(ROR 187.11)。心电图上QT间期延长(152例)仍然是最常报道的PT。在两种治疗方案中,45岁以下的个体经历了更高的频率和种类的ae,表明需要加强监测。对于那些超过45岁的人,应该特别注意心电图的变化,尤其是男性。最后,一些信号强度极高的PTs,如慢性肾盂肾炎(ROR 563.29)、丙型肝炎RNA升高(ROR 301.24)、支气管胸膜瘘(ROR 301.24),可能是贝达喹啉-氟喹诺酮联合用药的罕见不良事件。结论:我们的研究表明,贝达喹啉联合莫西沙星在心脏、肝脏和神经系统方面的安全性并不优于贝达喹啉联合左氧氟沙星。因此,在BPaLM方案中,如果能证明左氧氟沙星与莫西沙星的疗效相似,那么考虑用左氧氟沙星替代莫西沙星可能是值得的。可能需要对45岁以下的个体和男性耐多药结核病患者加强监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which fluoroquinolone is safer when combined with bedaquiline for tuberculosis treatment: evidence from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2013 to 2024.

Objective: To investigate which fluoroquinolone is safer when combined with bedaquiline for tuberculosis treatment by using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: We selected data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to the second quarter (Q4) of 2024 from the FDA FAERS database for disproportionality analysis. Signal detection was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM).

Results: This study analyzed 12, 303, 879 reports from the FAERS database, including 722 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and levofloxacin (with 2,723 adverse events) and 573 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and moxifloxacin (with 2,233 adverse events). For the bedaquiline-levofloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 100 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 128, ROR 5.79, PRR 5.56, IC 2.48, EBGM 5.56), blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 217, ROR 5.04, PRR 4.72, IC 2.24, EBGM 4.71), and metabolism and nutrition disorders (n = 185, ROR 3.44, PRR 3.27, IC 1.71, EBGM 3.27). In terms of PTs, the three strongest signals were portal fibrosis (ROR 330.64), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and toxic optic neuropathy (ROR 238.11). Reports of prolonged QT interval on ECG (125 cases) and anemia (130 cases) were significantly more frequent than other PTs. For the bedaquiline-moxifloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 85 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 141, ROR 7.9, PRR 7.47, IC 2.9, EBGM 7.46), ear and labyrinth disorders (n = 40, ROR 4.03, PRR 3.97, IC 1.99, EBGM 3.97), and cardiac disorders (n = 141, ROR 3.08, PRR 2.95, IC 1.56, EBGM 2.95). The three strongest PT signals were chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), bronchopleural fistula (ROR 314.86), and toxic neuropathy (ROR 187.11). Prolonged QT interval on ECG (152 cases) remained the most frequently reported PT. In both treatment regimens, individuals under 45 years of age experienced a higher frequency and variety of AEs, indicating the need for enhanced monitoring. For those over 45, particular attention should be given to ECG changes, especially in men. Finally, some PTs with extremely high signal strength, such as chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and bronchopleural fistula (ROR 301.24), may represent rare adverse events associated with the combination of bedaquiline-fluoroquinolone.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the safety profile of bedaquiline combined with moxifloxacin does not appear superior to that of bedaquiline combined with levofloxacin in terms of cardiac, hepatic, and neurological effects. Therefore, in the BPaLM regimen, considering the substitution of moxifloxacin with levofloxacin may be worthwhile if their efficacy is proven to be similar. Increased monitoring may be required for individuals under 45 years of age and male MDR-TB patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信