与抗真菌药物相关的严重皮肤不良反应:基于FDA不良事件报告系统(faers)数据库的药物警戒分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Huifang Shan, Chunyan Wei, Jingyi Zhang, Bin Wu
{"title":"与抗真菌药物相关的严重皮肤不良反应:基于FDA不良事件报告系统(faers)数据库的药物警戒分析。","authors":"Huifang Shan, Chunyan Wei, Jingyi Zhang, Bin Wu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) caused by different antifungal drugs in the real world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to December 2022 and performed disproportionality analyses to characterize the signal differences of antifungal agents-related SCARs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 952 antifungals-related SCARs were identified. Antifungal drugs-related SCARs were more common in the 18-64 age group than other groups, and five agents were detected significant SCAR signals in this age group. Among these antifungals, fluconazole had the strongest associations with the SCARs, and showed significant SCAR signals at all age stages. Six antifungals showed a significant association with SCARs under disproportionality. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for six antifungals were as follows: fluconazole (9.50, 8.62-10.47), caspofungin (8.92, 7.29-10.91), itraconazole (3.48, 2.78-4.35), amphotericin B (2.73, 2.20-3.39), micafungin (2.62, 1.85-3.71) and voriconazole (2.50, 2.12-2.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data mining of FAERS demonstrated that antifungal drugs were significantly associated with SCARs, which reminded clinicians to continue monitoring patients who are at risk of developing SCARs with the use of these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with antifungal agents: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.\",\"authors\":\"Huifang Shan, Chunyan Wei, Jingyi Zhang, Bin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) caused by different antifungal drugs in the real world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to December 2022 and performed disproportionality analyses to characterize the signal differences of antifungal agents-related SCARs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 952 antifungals-related SCARs were identified. Antifungal drugs-related SCARs were more common in the 18-64 age group than other groups, and five agents were detected significant SCAR signals in this age group. Among these antifungals, fluconazole had the strongest associations with the SCARs, and showed significant SCAR signals at all age stages. Six antifungals showed a significant association with SCARs under disproportionality. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for six antifungals were as follows: fluconazole (9.50, 8.62-10.47), caspofungin (8.92, 7.29-10.91), itraconazole (3.48, 2.78-4.35), amphotericin B (2.73, 2.20-3.39), micafungin (2.62, 1.85-3.71) and voriconazole (2.50, 2.12-2.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data mining of FAERS demonstrated that antifungal drugs were significantly associated with SCARs, which reminded clinicians to continue monitoring patients who are at risk of developing SCARs with the use of these drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2438744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2438744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是探讨现实世界中不同抗真菌药物引起严重皮肤不良反应(scar)的风险。方法:我们从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中提取2004年1月至2022年12月的数据,并进行歧化分析以表征抗真菌药物相关疤痕的信号差异。结果:共鉴定出952个抗真菌相关疤痕。抗真菌药物相关的SCAR在18-64岁年龄组中比其他年龄组更常见,该年龄组中有5种药物检测到显著的SCAR信号。在这些抗真菌药物中,氟康唑与SCAR的相关性最强,在所有年龄阶段均显示出显著的SCAR信号。6种抗真菌药物在歧化情况下与疤痕有显著关联。6种抗真菌药物的报告优势比(RORs)和95%可信区间(95% CI)分别为:氟康唑(9.50,8.62 ~ 10.47)、卡泊芬金(8.92,7.29 ~ 10.91)、伊曲康唑(3.48,2.78 ~ 4.35)、两性霉素B(2.73, 2.20 ~ 3.39)、米卡芬金(2.62,1.85 ~ 3.71)和伏立康唑(2.50,2.12 ~ 2.94)。结论:FAERS数据挖掘显示,抗真菌药物与疤痕显著相关,这提醒临床医生继续监测使用这些药物有发生疤痕风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with antifungal agents: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) caused by different antifungal drugs in the real world.

Methods: We extracted the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to December 2022 and performed disproportionality analyses to characterize the signal differences of antifungal agents-related SCARs.

Results: A total of 952 antifungals-related SCARs were identified. Antifungal drugs-related SCARs were more common in the 18-64 age group than other groups, and five agents were detected significant SCAR signals in this age group. Among these antifungals, fluconazole had the strongest associations with the SCARs, and showed significant SCAR signals at all age stages. Six antifungals showed a significant association with SCARs under disproportionality. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for six antifungals were as follows: fluconazole (9.50, 8.62-10.47), caspofungin (8.92, 7.29-10.91), itraconazole (3.48, 2.78-4.35), amphotericin B (2.73, 2.20-3.39), micafungin (2.62, 1.85-3.71) and voriconazole (2.50, 2.12-2.94).

Conclusions: The data mining of FAERS demonstrated that antifungal drugs were significantly associated with SCARs, which reminded clinicians to continue monitoring patients who are at risk of developing SCARs with the use of these drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信