针径对乳腺真空辅助切除效果的影响。一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Athanasios Zouzos , Irma Fredriksson , Andreas Karakatsanis , Iliana Aristokleous , Theodoros Foukakis , Fredrik Strand
{"title":"针径对乳腺真空辅助切除效果的影响。一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Athanasios Zouzos ,&nbsp;Irma Fredriksson ,&nbsp;Andreas Karakatsanis ,&nbsp;Iliana Aristokleous ,&nbsp;Theodoros Foukakis ,&nbsp;Fredrik Strand","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Utilizing a larger needle-size instead of a smaller one in vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions might enhance the effectiveness of the method. We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the effects of needle size 7G compared to 10G regarding excision completeness and procedural efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, the patients were enrolled between November 2019 and August 2022. Follow-up examinations were performed at 6 and 24 months after the procedure<strong>.</strong> In total, 208 patients were screened and enrolled, and following withdrawal of consent, the trial population comprised 194 patients. All patients with ultrasound-visible lesions of &lt;30 mm in size and biopsy confirmation corresponding to a B2 or B3 lesion were included in the study. Additionally, patients with BI-RADS 3 and 4a microcalcifications measuring &lt;15 mm were also eligible. Eighty-five percent of the patients attended the 6-month follow-up, and 65 % attended the 24-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant difference between the two randomization arms in terms of age, and lesion size. The mean procedure time was 7.7 min and 8.5 min for 7G and 10G needle size, respectively (=0.126). Of the 164 patients who attended the 6-month follow-up, no remaining lesions were found in 90 % and 81.5 % (p = 0.109) patients for 7G and 10G needle size respectively. Thirty percent (6/20) of the patients with microcalcifications excised stereotactically, guided by mammography, had a residual lesion compared to 2.5 % (1/42) of the patients with intraductal lesions excised under ultrasound guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using a 10G compared to a 7G needle size resulted in no difference in procedure time or excision completeness. Among the analyzed parameters, only a larger lesion size was consistently associated with a longer procedure time and a higher risk of incomplete excision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111895"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of needle size on outcomes of vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions. A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios Zouzos ,&nbsp;Irma Fredriksson ,&nbsp;Andreas Karakatsanis ,&nbsp;Iliana Aristokleous ,&nbsp;Theodoros Foukakis ,&nbsp;Fredrik Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Utilizing a larger needle-size instead of a smaller one in vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions might enhance the effectiveness of the method. We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the effects of needle size 7G compared to 10G regarding excision completeness and procedural efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, the patients were enrolled between November 2019 and August 2022. Follow-up examinations were performed at 6 and 24 months after the procedure<strong>.</strong> In total, 208 patients were screened and enrolled, and following withdrawal of consent, the trial population comprised 194 patients. All patients with ultrasound-visible lesions of &lt;30 mm in size and biopsy confirmation corresponding to a B2 or B3 lesion were included in the study. Additionally, patients with BI-RADS 3 and 4a microcalcifications measuring &lt;15 mm were also eligible. Eighty-five percent of the patients attended the 6-month follow-up, and 65 % attended the 24-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant difference between the two randomization arms in terms of age, and lesion size. The mean procedure time was 7.7 min and 8.5 min for 7G and 10G needle size, respectively (=0.126). Of the 164 patients who attended the 6-month follow-up, no remaining lesions were found in 90 % and 81.5 % (p = 0.109) patients for 7G and 10G needle size respectively. Thirty percent (6/20) of the patients with microcalcifications excised stereotactically, guided by mammography, had a residual lesion compared to 2.5 % (1/42) of the patients with intraductal lesions excised under ultrasound guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using a 10G compared to a 7G needle size resulted in no difference in procedure time or excision completeness. Among the analyzed parameters, only a larger lesion size was consistently associated with a longer procedure time and a higher risk of incomplete excision.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24006119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24006119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在乳腺病变的真空辅助切除中,使用较大的针径而不是较小的针径可以提高该方法的有效性。我们进行了一项临床试验,研究7G针头与10G针头在切除完整性和手术效率方面的影响。材料与方法:在这项前瞻性、单盲、随机临床试验中,患者于2019年11月至2022年8月入组。术后6个月和24个月分别进行随访检查。总共有208名患者被筛选和入组,在撤回同意后,试验人群包括194名患者。结果:两个随机分组组在年龄、病变大小方面无显著差异。7G针和10G针的平均手术时间分别为7.7 min和8.5 min(=0.126)。在随访6个月的164例患者中,7G和10G针径分别有90%和81.5% (p = 0.109)的患者未发现残留病变。30%(6/20)在乳房x线摄影引导下立体定向切除的微钙化患者有残留病变,而在超声引导下切除导管内病变的患者有2.5%(1/42)残留病变。结论:与7G针头相比,使用10G针头在手术时间和切除完整性上没有差异。在分析的参数中,只有较大的病变大小始终与较长的手术时间和较高的不完全切除风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of needle size on outcomes of vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions. A randomized controlled trial

Background

Utilizing a larger needle-size instead of a smaller one in vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions might enhance the effectiveness of the method. We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the effects of needle size 7G compared to 10G regarding excision completeness and procedural efficiency.

Materials and methods

In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, the patients were enrolled between November 2019 and August 2022. Follow-up examinations were performed at 6 and 24 months after the procedure. In total, 208 patients were screened and enrolled, and following withdrawal of consent, the trial population comprised 194 patients. All patients with ultrasound-visible lesions of <30 mm in size and biopsy confirmation corresponding to a B2 or B3 lesion were included in the study. Additionally, patients with BI-RADS 3 and 4a microcalcifications measuring <15 mm were also eligible. Eighty-five percent of the patients attended the 6-month follow-up, and 65 % attended the 24-month follow-up.

Results

There were no significant difference between the two randomization arms in terms of age, and lesion size. The mean procedure time was 7.7 min and 8.5 min for 7G and 10G needle size, respectively (=0.126). Of the 164 patients who attended the 6-month follow-up, no remaining lesions were found in 90 % and 81.5 % (p = 0.109) patients for 7G and 10G needle size respectively. Thirty percent (6/20) of the patients with microcalcifications excised stereotactically, guided by mammography, had a residual lesion compared to 2.5 % (1/42) of the patients with intraductal lesions excised under ultrasound guidance.

Conclusions

Using a 10G compared to a 7G needle size resulted in no difference in procedure time or excision completeness. Among the analyzed parameters, only a larger lesion size was consistently associated with a longer procedure time and a higher risk of incomplete excision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信