预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌生存结果的机制学习。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kevin Atsou, Anne Auperin, Jôel Guigay, Sébastien Salas, Sebastien Benzekry
{"title":"预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌生存结果的机制学习。","authors":"Kevin Atsou,&nbsp;Anne Auperin,&nbsp;Jôel Guigay,&nbsp;Sébastien Salas,&nbsp;Sebastien Benzekry","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We employed a mechanistic learning approach, integrating on-treatment tumor kinetics (TK) modeling with various machine learning (ML) models to address the challenge of predicting post-progression survival (PPS)—the duration from the time of documented disease progression to death—and overall survival (OS) in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). We compared the predictive power of model-derived TK parameters versus RECIST and assessed the efficacy of nine TK-OS ML models against conventional survival models. Data from 526 advanced HNSCC patients treated with chemotherapy and cetuximab in the TPExtreme trial were analyzed using a double-exponential model. TK parameters from the first line and maintenance (TKL1) or after four cycles (TK4) were used to predict PPS and post-cycle 4 OS (OS4), combined with 12 baseline parameters. While ML algorithms underperformed compared to the Cox model for PPS, a random survival forest was superior for OS prediction using TK4 and surpassed RECIST-based metrics. This model demonstrated unbiased OS4 prediction, suggesting its potential for improving HNSCC treatment evaluation.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02268695.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 3","pages":"540-550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13294","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic Learning for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Atsou,&nbsp;Anne Auperin,&nbsp;Jôel Guigay,&nbsp;Sébastien Salas,&nbsp;Sebastien Benzekry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.13294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We employed a mechanistic learning approach, integrating on-treatment tumor kinetics (TK) modeling with various machine learning (ML) models to address the challenge of predicting post-progression survival (PPS)—the duration from the time of documented disease progression to death—and overall survival (OS) in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). We compared the predictive power of model-derived TK parameters versus RECIST and assessed the efficacy of nine TK-OS ML models against conventional survival models. Data from 526 advanced HNSCC patients treated with chemotherapy and cetuximab in the TPExtreme trial were analyzed using a double-exponential model. TK parameters from the first line and maintenance (TKL1) or after four cycles (TK4) were used to predict PPS and post-cycle 4 OS (OS4), combined with 12 baseline parameters. While ML algorithms underperformed compared to the Cox model for PPS, a random survival forest was superior for OS prediction using TK4 and surpassed RECIST-based metrics. This model demonstrated unbiased OS4 prediction, suggesting its potential for improving HNSCC treatment evaluation.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02268695.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"540-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13294\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们采用了一种机制学习方法,将治疗中肿瘤动力学(TK)模型与各种机器学习(ML)模型相结合,以解决预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)进展后生存(PPS)(从记录的疾病进展到死亡的持续时间)和总生存(OS)的挑战。我们比较了模型衍生TK参数与RECIST的预测能力,并评估了9种TK- os ML模型与传统生存模型的疗效。在TPExtreme试验中,526例接受化疗和西妥昔单抗治疗的晚期HNSCC患者的数据使用双指数模型进行分析。结合12个基线参数,采用一线和维持期TK参数(TKL1)或四个周期后TK参数(TK4)预测PPS和周期后OS (OS4)。虽然ML算法在PPS方面的表现不如Cox模型,但使用TK4进行OS预测的随机生存森林优于基于recist的指标。该模型显示出无偏倚的OS4预测,表明其具有改善HNSCC治疗评估的潜力。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02268695。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanistic Learning for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Mechanistic Learning for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

We employed a mechanistic learning approach, integrating on-treatment tumor kinetics (TK) modeling with various machine learning (ML) models to address the challenge of predicting post-progression survival (PPS)—the duration from the time of documented disease progression to death—and overall survival (OS) in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). We compared the predictive power of model-derived TK parameters versus RECIST and assessed the efficacy of nine TK-OS ML models against conventional survival models. Data from 526 advanced HNSCC patients treated with chemotherapy and cetuximab in the TPExtreme trial were analyzed using a double-exponential model. TK parameters from the first line and maintenance (TKL1) or after four cycles (TK4) were used to predict PPS and post-cycle 4 OS (OS4), combined with 12 baseline parameters. While ML algorithms underperformed compared to the Cox model for PPS, a random survival forest was superior for OS prediction using TK4 and surpassed RECIST-based metrics. This model demonstrated unbiased OS4 prediction, suggesting its potential for improving HNSCC treatment evaluation.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02268695.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信