Bianca O Cata-Preta, Thiago M Santos, Andrea Wendt, Luisa Arroyave, Tewodaj Mengistu, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday
{"title":"82个低收入和中等收入国家家庭疫苗接种记录的所有权和可得性不平等。","authors":"Bianca O Cata-Preta, Thiago M Santos, Andrea Wendt, Luisa Arroyave, Tewodaj Mengistu, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home-based records (HBRs) are widely used for recording health information including child immunisations. We studied levels and inequalities in HBR ownership in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) using data from national surveys conducted since 2010.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from national household surveys (Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS)) from 82 LMICs. 465 060 children aged 6-35 months were classified into four categories: HBR seen by the interviewer; mother/caregiver never had an HBR; mother/caregiver had an HBR that was lost; and reportedly have an HBR that was not seen by the interviewer. Inequalities according to age, sex, household wealth, maternal education, antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were studied, as were associations between HBR ownership and vaccine coverage. Pooled analyses were carried out using country weights based on child populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An HBR was seen for 67.8% (95% CI 67.4% to 68.2%) of the children, 9.2% (95% CI 9.0% to 9.4%) no longer had an HBR, 12.8% (95% CI 12.5% to 13.0%) reportedly had an HBR that was not seen and 10.2% (95% CI 9.9% to 10.5%) had never received one. The lowest percentages of HBRs seen were in Kiribati (22.1%), the Democratic Republic of Congo (24.5%), Central African Republic (24.7%), Chad (27.9%) and Mauritania (35.5%). The proportions of HBRs seen declined with age and were inversely associated with household wealth and maternal schooling. Antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were positively associated with ownership. There were no differences between boys and girls. When an HBR was seen, higher immunisation coverage and lower vaccine dropout rates were observed, but the direction of this association remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>HBR coverage levels were remarkably low in many LMICs, particularly among children from the poorest families and those whose mothers had low schooling. Contact with antenatal and delivery care was associated with higher HBR coverage. Interventions are urgently needed to ensure that all children are issued HBRs, and to promote proper storage of such cards by families.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequalities in ownership and availability of home-based vaccination records in 82 low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Bianca O Cata-Preta, Thiago M Santos, Andrea Wendt, Luisa Arroyave, Tewodaj Mengistu, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home-based records (HBRs) are widely used for recording health information including child immunisations. We studied levels and inequalities in HBR ownership in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) using data from national surveys conducted since 2010.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from national household surveys (Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS)) from 82 LMICs. 465 060 children aged 6-35 months were classified into four categories: HBR seen by the interviewer; mother/caregiver never had an HBR; mother/caregiver had an HBR that was lost; and reportedly have an HBR that was not seen by the interviewer. Inequalities according to age, sex, household wealth, maternal education, antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were studied, as were associations between HBR ownership and vaccine coverage. Pooled analyses were carried out using country weights based on child populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An HBR was seen for 67.8% (95% CI 67.4% to 68.2%) of the children, 9.2% (95% CI 9.0% to 9.4%) no longer had an HBR, 12.8% (95% CI 12.5% to 13.0%) reportedly had an HBR that was not seen and 10.2% (95% CI 9.9% to 10.5%) had never received one. The lowest percentages of HBRs seen were in Kiribati (22.1%), the Democratic Republic of Congo (24.5%), Central African Republic (24.7%), Chad (27.9%) and Mauritania (35.5%). The proportions of HBRs seen declined with age and were inversely associated with household wealth and maternal schooling. Antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were positively associated with ownership. There were no differences between boys and girls. When an HBR was seen, higher immunisation coverage and lower vaccine dropout rates were observed, but the direction of this association remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>HBR coverage levels were remarkably low in many LMICs, particularly among children from the poorest families and those whose mothers had low schooling. Contact with antenatal and delivery care was associated with higher HBR coverage. Interventions are urgently needed to ensure that all children are issued HBRs, and to promote proper storage of such cards by families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
家庭记录(HBRs)广泛用于记录包括儿童免疫接种在内的健康信息。我们使用自2010年以来开展的国家调查数据,研究了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs) HBR所有权的水平和不平等。方法:我们使用来自82个低收入国家的全国住户调查(人口与健康调查(DHS)和多指标类集调查(MICS))的数据。465 060名6-35个月大的儿童被分为四类:面试官看到的HBR;母亲/照顾者从未有过哈佛商业评论;母亲/照顾者有丢失的HBR;据报道,他的哈佛商业评论没有被面试官看到。研究了年龄、性别、家庭财富、产妇教育、产前保健和在机构环境中分娩的不平等,以及HBR所有权与疫苗覆盖率之间的关系。使用基于儿童人口的国家权重进行了汇总分析。结果:67.8% (95% CI 67.4%至68.2%)的儿童见过HBR, 9.2% (95% CI 9.0%至9.4%)的儿童不再有HBR, 12.8% (95% CI 12.5%至13.0%)的儿童报告有未见的HBR, 10.2% (95% CI 9.9%至10.5%)的儿童从未接受过HBR。hbr比例最低的国家是基里巴斯(22.1%)、刚果民主共和国(24.5%)、中非共和国(24.7%)、乍得(27.9%)和毛里塔尼亚(35.5%)。hbr的比例随着年龄的增长而下降,与家庭财富和母亲受教育程度呈负相关。产前护理和在机构环境中分娩与所有权呈正相关。男孩和女孩之间没有差异。当观察到HBR时,观察到更高的免疫覆盖率和更低的疫苗辍学率,但这种关联的方向尚不清楚。解读:在许多中低收入国家,哈佛商业评论的覆盖率非常低,尤其是在最贫困家庭和母亲受教育程度较低的儿童中。接触产前和分娩护理与较高的HBR覆盖率相关。迫切需要采取干预措施,以确保向所有儿童发放hbr,并促进家庭妥善储存这种卡。
Inequalities in ownership and availability of home-based vaccination records in 82 low- and middle-income countries.
Introduction: Home-based records (HBRs) are widely used for recording health information including child immunisations. We studied levels and inequalities in HBR ownership in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) using data from national surveys conducted since 2010.
Methods: We used data from national household surveys (Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS)) from 82 LMICs. 465 060 children aged 6-35 months were classified into four categories: HBR seen by the interviewer; mother/caregiver never had an HBR; mother/caregiver had an HBR that was lost; and reportedly have an HBR that was not seen by the interviewer. Inequalities according to age, sex, household wealth, maternal education, antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were studied, as were associations between HBR ownership and vaccine coverage. Pooled analyses were carried out using country weights based on child populations.
Results: An HBR was seen for 67.8% (95% CI 67.4% to 68.2%) of the children, 9.2% (95% CI 9.0% to 9.4%) no longer had an HBR, 12.8% (95% CI 12.5% to 13.0%) reportedly had an HBR that was not seen and 10.2% (95% CI 9.9% to 10.5%) had never received one. The lowest percentages of HBRs seen were in Kiribati (22.1%), the Democratic Republic of Congo (24.5%), Central African Republic (24.7%), Chad (27.9%) and Mauritania (35.5%). The proportions of HBRs seen declined with age and were inversely associated with household wealth and maternal schooling. Antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were positively associated with ownership. There were no differences between boys and girls. When an HBR was seen, higher immunisation coverage and lower vaccine dropout rates were observed, but the direction of this association remains unclear.
Interpretation: HBR coverage levels were remarkably low in many LMICs, particularly among children from the poorest families and those whose mothers had low schooling. Contact with antenatal and delivery care was associated with higher HBR coverage. Interventions are urgently needed to ensure that all children are issued HBRs, and to promote proper storage of such cards by families.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.