应用生理药代动力学模型比较两性霉素B脂质体与常规两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐在人体内的生物分布。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1002/bdd.2406
Xueyuan Zhang, Yingying Yang, Manman Wang, Huanhuan Qi, Chunlei Li, Limei Zhao
{"title":"应用生理药代动力学模型比较两性霉素B脂质体与常规两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐在人体内的生物分布。","authors":"Xueyuan Zhang, Yingying Yang, Manman Wang, Huanhuan Qi, Chunlei Li, Limei Zhao","doi":"10.1002/bdd.2406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amphotericin B (AmB) has been a cornerstone in the treatment of invasive fungal infections for over 6 decades. Compared with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-DOC), liposomal amphotericin B has comparable efficacy but less nephrotoxicity. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the reason why liposomal amphotericin B has similar therapeutic effects but lower toxicity and the differences of distribution in humans between liposomal amphotericin B and AmB-DOC. To compare the distribution of liposomal amphotericin B and AmB-DOC in humans, the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was established by bottom-up stepwise method. A rat PBPK model was established firstly, then verified in mouse level in consideration of interspecies differences in physiological- and drug-specific parameters, and finally the PBPK model was extrapolated to humans. Based on preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, the AmB-DOC and liposomal amphotericin B PBPK model were established, respectively. The simulated results of human PBPK model showed that the liposomal formulation changed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AmB. Compared with AmB-DOC, the plasma exposure of liposomal formulation was higher, but the renal exposure was significantly reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":8865,"journal":{"name":"Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition","volume":" ","pages":"208-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Compare the Biodistribution of Liposomal Amphotericin B With Conventional Amphotericin B Deoxycholate in Humans.\",\"authors\":\"Xueyuan Zhang, Yingying Yang, Manman Wang, Huanhuan Qi, Chunlei Li, Limei Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bdd.2406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Amphotericin B (AmB) has been a cornerstone in the treatment of invasive fungal infections for over 6 decades. Compared with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-DOC), liposomal amphotericin B has comparable efficacy but less nephrotoxicity. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the reason why liposomal amphotericin B has similar therapeutic effects but lower toxicity and the differences of distribution in humans between liposomal amphotericin B and AmB-DOC. To compare the distribution of liposomal amphotericin B and AmB-DOC in humans, the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was established by bottom-up stepwise method. A rat PBPK model was established firstly, then verified in mouse level in consideration of interspecies differences in physiological- and drug-specific parameters, and finally the PBPK model was extrapolated to humans. Based on preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, the AmB-DOC and liposomal amphotericin B PBPK model were established, respectively. The simulated results of human PBPK model showed that the liposomal formulation changed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AmB. Compared with AmB-DOC, the plasma exposure of liposomal formulation was higher, but the renal exposure was significantly reduced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"208-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.2406\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.2406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两性霉素B (AmB)已成为治疗侵袭性真菌感染的基石超过60年。与常规两性霉素B去氧胆酸盐(AmB-DOC)相比,脂质体两性霉素B具有相当的疗效,但肾毒性较小。本研究的主要目的是探讨两性霉素B脂质体治疗效果相似但毒性较低的原因,以及两性霉素B脂质体与AmB-DOC在人体中的分布差异。为了比较两性霉素B脂质体和AmB-DOC在人体内的分布,采用自下而上逐步法建立生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型。首先建立大鼠PBPK模型,然后考虑物种间生理和药物特异性参数的差异,在小鼠水平上进行验证,最后将PBPK模型外推到人类。基于临床前和临床药代动力学(PK)研究,分别建立AmB-DOC和脂质体两性霉素B PBPK模型。人PBPK模型模拟结果显示,脂质体制剂改变了AmB的药代动力学特征。与AmB-DOC相比,脂质体制剂的血浆暴露量较高,但肾脏暴露量明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Compare the Biodistribution of Liposomal Amphotericin B With Conventional Amphotericin B Deoxycholate in Humans.

Amphotericin B (AmB) has been a cornerstone in the treatment of invasive fungal infections for over 6 decades. Compared with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-DOC), liposomal amphotericin B has comparable efficacy but less nephrotoxicity. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the reason why liposomal amphotericin B has similar therapeutic effects but lower toxicity and the differences of distribution in humans between liposomal amphotericin B and AmB-DOC. To compare the distribution of liposomal amphotericin B and AmB-DOC in humans, the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was established by bottom-up stepwise method. A rat PBPK model was established firstly, then verified in mouse level in consideration of interspecies differences in physiological- and drug-specific parameters, and finally the PBPK model was extrapolated to humans. Based on preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, the AmB-DOC and liposomal amphotericin B PBPK model were established, respectively. The simulated results of human PBPK model showed that the liposomal formulation changed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AmB. Compared with AmB-DOC, the plasma exposure of liposomal formulation was higher, but the renal exposure was significantly reduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biopharmaceutics & Drug Dispositionpublishes original review articles, short communications, and reports in biopharmaceutics, drug disposition, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, especially those that have a direct relation to the drug discovery/development and the therapeutic use of drugs. These includes: - animal and human pharmacological studies that focus on therapeutic response. pharmacodynamics, and toxicity related to plasma and tissue concentrations of drugs and their metabolites, - in vitro and in vivo drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, transport, and excretion studies that facilitate investigations related to the use of drugs in man - studies on membrane transport and enzymes, including their regulation and the impact of pharmacogenomics on drug absorption and disposition, - simulation and modeling in drug discovery and development - theoretical treatises - includes themed issues and reviews and exclude manuscripts on - bioavailability studies reporting only on simple PK parameters such as Cmax, tmax and t1/2 without mechanistic interpretation - analytical methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信