多大才算太老?老年患者卵圆孔未闭的闭合。

US cardiology Pub Date : 2021-10-21 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.15420/usc.2020.40
Carlos Vazquez-Sosa, Stacey D Clegg, James C Blankenship
{"title":"多大才算太老?老年患者卵圆孔未闭的闭合。","authors":"Carlos Vazquez-Sosa, Stacey D Clegg, James C Blankenship","doi":"10.15420/usc.2020.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces the risk of recurrent cryptogenic stroke specifically in younger patients. The three randomized controlled trials that led to the widespread adoption of PFO closure excluded patients over the age of 60 years. Older patients frequently have other cardiac and vascular conditions that are common risk factors for stroke, whereas paradoxical embolism through a PFO is relatively rare. Younger patients theoretically benefit the most from closure due to longer lifetime exposure risk and absence of other traditional risk factors. PFO in older patients with cryptogenic strokes is often encountered in clinical practice, making up an increasing number of cardiology referrals, yet cardiologists lack guidelines and evaluation tools for these patients. This review explores the history of PFO closure - emphasizing data in older adults - and discusses the evaluation and treatment of older people with cryptogenic stroke and PFO while further trials in this important population are awaited.</p>","PeriodicalId":93393,"journal":{"name":"US cardiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"e20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Old is Too Old? Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Older Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Vazquez-Sosa, Stacey D Clegg, James C Blankenship\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/usc.2020.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces the risk of recurrent cryptogenic stroke specifically in younger patients. The three randomized controlled trials that led to the widespread adoption of PFO closure excluded patients over the age of 60 years. Older patients frequently have other cardiac and vascular conditions that are common risk factors for stroke, whereas paradoxical embolism through a PFO is relatively rare. Younger patients theoretically benefit the most from closure due to longer lifetime exposure risk and absence of other traditional risk factors. PFO in older patients with cryptogenic strokes is often encountered in clinical practice, making up an increasing number of cardiology referrals, yet cardiologists lack guidelines and evaluation tools for these patients. This review explores the history of PFO closure - emphasizing data in older adults - and discusses the evaluation and treatment of older people with cryptogenic stroke and PFO while further trials in this important population are awaited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"US cardiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"e20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"US cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2020.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2020.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮闭合卵圆孔未闭(PFO)可降低隐源性卒中复发的风险,特别是在年轻患者中。导致广泛采用PFO闭合的三个随机对照试验排除了60岁以上的患者。老年患者经常有其他心脏和血管疾病,这些疾病是卒中的常见危险因素,而通过PFO的矛盾栓塞相对罕见。理论上,年轻的患者从闭合中受益最大,因为他们一生暴露的风险更长,而且没有其他传统的风险因素。老年隐蔽性卒中患者的PFO在临床实践中经常遇到,在心脏病学转诊中占越来越多的比例,但心脏病专家缺乏针对这些患者的指南和评估工具。这篇综述探讨了PFO关闭的历史-强调老年人的数据-并讨论了老年人隐源性卒中和PFO的评估和治疗,而这一重要人群的进一步试验正在等待中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Old is Too Old? Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Older Patients.

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces the risk of recurrent cryptogenic stroke specifically in younger patients. The three randomized controlled trials that led to the widespread adoption of PFO closure excluded patients over the age of 60 years. Older patients frequently have other cardiac and vascular conditions that are common risk factors for stroke, whereas paradoxical embolism through a PFO is relatively rare. Younger patients theoretically benefit the most from closure due to longer lifetime exposure risk and absence of other traditional risk factors. PFO in older patients with cryptogenic strokes is often encountered in clinical practice, making up an increasing number of cardiology referrals, yet cardiologists lack guidelines and evaluation tools for these patients. This review explores the history of PFO closure - emphasizing data in older adults - and discusses the evaluation and treatment of older people with cryptogenic stroke and PFO while further trials in this important population are awaited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信