经骨Krackow缝合穿过技术修复急性3级合并后外侧角撕脱伤。

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065
Nancy Park, Hugh Medvecky, Jay Moran, Michael J Medvecky
{"title":"经骨Krackow缝合穿过技术修复急性3级合并后外侧角撕脱伤。","authors":"Nancy Park, Hugh Medvecky, Jay Moran, Michael J Medvecky","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis<sup>1-5</sup>. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction<sup>3,6</sup>. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented<sup>7</sup>. In the present video article, we demonstrate a transosseous Krackow pull-through technique for repair of acute avulsion-type PLC multiligamentous knee injuries with no midsubstance injury.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>An incision is made along the lateral aspect of the knee from the epicondyle to the fibular shaft. The soft-tissue avulsion injury is identified and tagged with suture. Locking Krackow sutures are placed into the injured structures without separating the soft-tissue sleeve avulsion. With fibular avulsions, fibular and tibial transosseous tunnels are drilled with 2 Beath pins through the fibular head and tibia, exiting through the anteromedial tibial cortex. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and anterior biceps sutures are passed through the anterior tunnel, and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and posterior biceps sutures are passed through the posterior tunnel. A small incision is made over the anteromedial tibial cortex in order to tie the sutures over the same metallic button. In fibular head avulsion fractures, high-strength suture placed through the fibular neck can provide additional compression. For proximal PLC injuries, the iliotibial band is incised at the lateral epicondyle, and the proximal attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus are localized. Krackow locking sutures are placed within the LCL and popliteus tendon. Transosseous tunnels are drilled with Beath pins through the native attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus on the lateral condyle and are directed anteriorly to avoid convergence with a potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel. Sutures are pulled through the femoral attachment sites and tied over the same metallic button.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>For acute PLC injuries, nonoperative treatment is not endorsed for the majority of cases. Surgical options include direct repair, repair with augmentation, or reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The transosseous Krackow pull-through technique allows for an enhanced and secure soft-tissue repair while avoiding suture anchor pull-out from the metaphyseal fibular head bone, which can also be compromised by cortical avulsion fractures. This procedure avoids the cost of an allograft and the donor-site morbidity of an autograft that are associated with a reconstruction. For patients with midsubstance tears, chronic injuries, and/or inadequate tissue quality, reconstructions or augmentations are more appropriate. According to Moran et al., this technique can result in a similar failure rate (10.7%) to initial reconstruction and a far lower failure rate than seen in other PLC repair techniques<sup>8</sup>. The present technique has a comparatively more reliable fixation method, as the suture is secured to dense tibial cortical bone, avoiding the suture anchor dislodgement that can occur with solely fibular fixation<sup>8</sup>. This is advantageous when the fibular bone is fragile or fractured. Suture pull-out may be further prevented with multiple locking Krackow sutures.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 2 years (range, 3 to 90 months), Moran et al. reported a failure rate of 10.7%, which was significantly lower than the failure rate of 38% reported in a 2016 systematic review of PLC repairs<sup>8,9</sup>. On clinical examination, the procedure yielded a significant decrease in lateral compartment opening, from 9 mm preoperatively to 0 mm postoperatively<sup>8</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>For distal PLC injuries, perform a peroneal neurolysis to identify and decompress the peroneal nerve.Carefully evaluate the soft tissue proximal to the avulsed portion to determine if any midsubstance tearing is present.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>PLC = posterolateral cornerLCL = lateral collateral ligamentPFL = popliteofibular ligamentACL = anterior cruciate ligamentALL = anterolateral ligamentMRI = magnetic resonance imagingAM = anteromedialPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentFU = follow-upPROM = patient-reported outcome measureTDWB = touch-down weight-bearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repair of Acute Grade-3 Combined Posterolateral Corner Avulsion Injuries Using a Transosseous Krackow Suture Pull-Through Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy Park, Hugh Medvecky, Jay Moran, Michael J Medvecky\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis<sup>1-5</sup>. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction<sup>3,6</sup>. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented<sup>7</sup>. In the present video article, we demonstrate a transosseous Krackow pull-through technique for repair of acute avulsion-type PLC multiligamentous knee injuries with no midsubstance injury.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>An incision is made along the lateral aspect of the knee from the epicondyle to the fibular shaft. The soft-tissue avulsion injury is identified and tagged with suture. Locking Krackow sutures are placed into the injured structures without separating the soft-tissue sleeve avulsion. With fibular avulsions, fibular and tibial transosseous tunnels are drilled with 2 Beath pins through the fibular head and tibia, exiting through the anteromedial tibial cortex. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and anterior biceps sutures are passed through the anterior tunnel, and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and posterior biceps sutures are passed through the posterior tunnel. A small incision is made over the anteromedial tibial cortex in order to tie the sutures over the same metallic button. In fibular head avulsion fractures, high-strength suture placed through the fibular neck can provide additional compression. For proximal PLC injuries, the iliotibial band is incised at the lateral epicondyle, and the proximal attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus are localized. Krackow locking sutures are placed within the LCL and popliteus tendon. Transosseous tunnels are drilled with Beath pins through the native attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus on the lateral condyle and are directed anteriorly to avoid convergence with a potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel. Sutures are pulled through the femoral attachment sites and tied over the same metallic button.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>For acute PLC injuries, nonoperative treatment is not endorsed for the majority of cases. Surgical options include direct repair, repair with augmentation, or reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The transosseous Krackow pull-through technique allows for an enhanced and secure soft-tissue repair while avoiding suture anchor pull-out from the metaphyseal fibular head bone, which can also be compromised by cortical avulsion fractures. This procedure avoids the cost of an allograft and the donor-site morbidity of an autograft that are associated with a reconstruction. For patients with midsubstance tears, chronic injuries, and/or inadequate tissue quality, reconstructions or augmentations are more appropriate. According to Moran et al., this technique can result in a similar failure rate (10.7%) to initial reconstruction and a far lower failure rate than seen in other PLC repair techniques<sup>8</sup>. The present technique has a comparatively more reliable fixation method, as the suture is secured to dense tibial cortical bone, avoiding the suture anchor dislodgement that can occur with solely fibular fixation<sup>8</sup>. This is advantageous when the fibular bone is fragile or fractured. Suture pull-out may be further prevented with multiple locking Krackow sutures.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 2 years (range, 3 to 90 months), Moran et al. reported a failure rate of 10.7%, which was significantly lower than the failure rate of 38% reported in a 2016 systematic review of PLC repairs<sup>8,9</sup>. On clinical examination, the procedure yielded a significant decrease in lateral compartment opening, from 9 mm preoperatively to 0 mm postoperatively<sup>8</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>For distal PLC injuries, perform a peroneal neurolysis to identify and decompress the peroneal nerve.Carefully evaluate the soft tissue proximal to the avulsed portion to determine if any midsubstance tearing is present.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>PLC = posterolateral cornerLCL = lateral collateral ligamentPFL = popliteofibular ligamentACL = anterior cruciate ligamentALL = anterolateral ligamentMRI = magnetic resonance imagingAM = anteromedialPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentFU = follow-upPROM = patient-reported outcome measureTDWB = touch-down weight-bearing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于后外侧角(PLC)结构的完全破坏,手术治疗是最常被提倡的,因为非手术治疗具有更高的持续性外侧松弛和创伤后关节炎的发生率1-5。一些研究表明,急性直接修复的修复率高达37%至40%,而初始重建的修复率为6%至9% 3,6。在最近的一项研究中,对PLC撕脱伤的急性修复进行了2 - 7年的随访,结果显示,组织充足的患者的失败率远低于之前的文献7。在这篇视频文章中,我们展示了一种经骨Krackow拉通技术用于修复无中间物质损伤的急性撕脱型PLC多韧带膝关节损伤。描述:沿膝关节外侧从上髁至腓骨干处切开。软组织撕脱伤被识别并用缝线标记。将锁定Krackow缝合线置入受伤结构中,而不分离软组织套筒撕脱。在腓骨撕脱时,用2个Beath销穿过腓骨头和胫骨钻出腓骨和胫骨经骨隧道,穿过胫骨前内侧皮质。外侧副韧带(LCL)和前二头肌缝合线穿过前隧道,腘腓韧带(PFL)和后二头肌缝合线穿过后隧道。在胫骨前内侧皮质上做一个小切口,以便将缝合线绑在同一金属钮扣上。在腓骨头撕脱性骨折中,通过腓骨颈放置高强度缝线可以提供额外的压迫。对于PLC近端损伤,在外侧上髁处切开髂胫束,并定位LCL和腘肌的近端附着部位。Krackow锁定缝合线置于LCL和腘肌肌腱内。经骨隧道用Beath销钉穿过LCL和腘肌在外侧髁上的固有附着点,并指向前方,以避免与潜在的前交叉韧带(ACL)股隧道汇合。将缝合线穿过股骨附着点,绑在同一金属按钮上。替代方案:对于急性PLC损伤,大多数情况下不支持非手术治疗。手术选择包括直接修复、增强修复或重建。原理:经骨Krackow牵引技术可以增强和安全的软组织修复,同时避免从干骺端腓骨头骨拔出缝线锚,这也可能因皮质撕脱骨折而受到损害。这种方法避免了同种异体移植物的成本和自体移植物与重建相关的供体部位发病率。对于中间物质撕裂、慢性损伤和/或组织质量不足的患者,重建或增强更为合适。根据Moran等人的研究,该技术可以导致与初始重建相似的故障率(10.7%),且故障率远低于其他PLC修复技术8。本技术具有相对更可靠的固定方法,因为缝线固定在致密的胫骨皮质骨上,避免了单纯腓骨固定可能出现的缝线锚点移位8。当腓骨脆弱或骨折时,这是有利的。多重锁定Krackow缝合线可进一步防止缝线拔出。预期结果:平均随访2年(范围3至90个月),Moran等人报告的故障率为10.7%,显著低于2016年PLC修复系统综述中报告的38%的故障率8,9。在临床检查中,手术使侧室开口明显减小,从术前的9mm减少到术后的0mm 8。重要提示:对于PLC远端损伤,进行腓神经松解术以识别腓神经并减压。仔细评估撕脱部分近端的软组织,以确定是否存在任何中间物质撕裂。缩写词:PLC =后外侧角lcl =外侧副韧带pfl =腘腓韧带acl =前交叉韧带all =前外侧韧带mri =磁共振成像am =前内侧pcl =后交叉韧带fu =随访=患者报告的结果测量dwb =触地负重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repair of Acute Grade-3 Combined Posterolateral Corner Avulsion Injuries Using a Transosseous Krackow Suture Pull-Through Technique.

Background: For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis1-5. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction3,6. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented7. In the present video article, we demonstrate a transosseous Krackow pull-through technique for repair of acute avulsion-type PLC multiligamentous knee injuries with no midsubstance injury.

Description: An incision is made along the lateral aspect of the knee from the epicondyle to the fibular shaft. The soft-tissue avulsion injury is identified and tagged with suture. Locking Krackow sutures are placed into the injured structures without separating the soft-tissue sleeve avulsion. With fibular avulsions, fibular and tibial transosseous tunnels are drilled with 2 Beath pins through the fibular head and tibia, exiting through the anteromedial tibial cortex. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and anterior biceps sutures are passed through the anterior tunnel, and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and posterior biceps sutures are passed through the posterior tunnel. A small incision is made over the anteromedial tibial cortex in order to tie the sutures over the same metallic button. In fibular head avulsion fractures, high-strength suture placed through the fibular neck can provide additional compression. For proximal PLC injuries, the iliotibial band is incised at the lateral epicondyle, and the proximal attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus are localized. Krackow locking sutures are placed within the LCL and popliteus tendon. Transosseous tunnels are drilled with Beath pins through the native attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus on the lateral condyle and are directed anteriorly to avoid convergence with a potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel. Sutures are pulled through the femoral attachment sites and tied over the same metallic button.

Alternatives: For acute PLC injuries, nonoperative treatment is not endorsed for the majority of cases. Surgical options include direct repair, repair with augmentation, or reconstruction.

Rationale: The transosseous Krackow pull-through technique allows for an enhanced and secure soft-tissue repair while avoiding suture anchor pull-out from the metaphyseal fibular head bone, which can also be compromised by cortical avulsion fractures. This procedure avoids the cost of an allograft and the donor-site morbidity of an autograft that are associated with a reconstruction. For patients with midsubstance tears, chronic injuries, and/or inadequate tissue quality, reconstructions or augmentations are more appropriate. According to Moran et al., this technique can result in a similar failure rate (10.7%) to initial reconstruction and a far lower failure rate than seen in other PLC repair techniques8. The present technique has a comparatively more reliable fixation method, as the suture is secured to dense tibial cortical bone, avoiding the suture anchor dislodgement that can occur with solely fibular fixation8. This is advantageous when the fibular bone is fragile or fractured. Suture pull-out may be further prevented with multiple locking Krackow sutures.

Expected outcomes: At a mean follow-up of 2 years (range, 3 to 90 months), Moran et al. reported a failure rate of 10.7%, which was significantly lower than the failure rate of 38% reported in a 2016 systematic review of PLC repairs8,9. On clinical examination, the procedure yielded a significant decrease in lateral compartment opening, from 9 mm preoperatively to 0 mm postoperatively8.

Important tips: For distal PLC injuries, perform a peroneal neurolysis to identify and decompress the peroneal nerve.Carefully evaluate the soft tissue proximal to the avulsed portion to determine if any midsubstance tearing is present.

Acronyms and abbreviations: PLC = posterolateral cornerLCL = lateral collateral ligamentPFL = popliteofibular ligamentACL = anterior cruciate ligamentALL = anterolateral ligamentMRI = magnetic resonance imagingAM = anteromedialPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentFU = follow-upPROM = patient-reported outcome measureTDWB = touch-down weight-bearing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信