{"title":"尽管杜氏基因疗法具有免疫原性作用,但它是一种合适的治疗方法吗?","authors":"Annie Tang, Toshifumi Yokota","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2447072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and eventual death due to cardiomyopathy or respiratory complications. Currently, there is no cure for DMD, with standard treatments primarily focusing on symptom management. Using immunosuppressive measures and optimized vector designs allows for gene therapies to better address the genetic cause of the disease.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of emerging DMD gene therapies as of 2024. It also discusses the potential of utrophin upregulation, gene editing, and truncated dystrophin as therapeutic strategies. It highlights safety concerns associated with these therapies, including adverse events and patient deaths. A comprehensive overview of developments covers topics such as CRISPR-Cas9 therapies, micro-dystrophin, and the potential delivery of full-length dystrophin.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The FDA's recent approval of delandistrogene moxeparvovec (Elevidys) underscores the promise of gene replacement therapies for DMD patients. Understanding the mechanisms behind the adverse effects and excluding patients with specific pathogenic variants may enhance the safety profiles of these therapies. CRISPR/Cas9 therapies, while promising, face significant regulatory and safety challenges that hinder their clinical application. Optimal DMD therapies should target both skeletal and cardiac muscles to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Duchenne gene therapy a suitable treatment despite its immunogenic class effect?\",\"authors\":\"Annie Tang, Toshifumi Yokota\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2447072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and eventual death due to cardiomyopathy or respiratory complications. Currently, there is no cure for DMD, with standard treatments primarily focusing on symptom management. Using immunosuppressive measures and optimized vector designs allows for gene therapies to better address the genetic cause of the disease.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of emerging DMD gene therapies as of 2024. It also discusses the potential of utrophin upregulation, gene editing, and truncated dystrophin as therapeutic strategies. It highlights safety concerns associated with these therapies, including adverse events and patient deaths. A comprehensive overview of developments covers topics such as CRISPR-Cas9 therapies, micro-dystrophin, and the potential delivery of full-length dystrophin.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The FDA's recent approval of delandistrogene moxeparvovec (Elevidys) underscores the promise of gene replacement therapies for DMD patients. Understanding the mechanisms behind the adverse effects and excluding patients with specific pathogenic variants may enhance the safety profiles of these therapies. CRISPR/Cas9 therapies, while promising, face significant regulatory and safety challenges that hinder their clinical application. Optimal DMD therapies should target both skeletal and cardiac muscles to be effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2447072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2447072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Duchenne gene therapy a suitable treatment despite its immunogenic class effect?
Introduction: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and eventual death due to cardiomyopathy or respiratory complications. Currently, there is no cure for DMD, with standard treatments primarily focusing on symptom management. Using immunosuppressive measures and optimized vector designs allows for gene therapies to better address the genetic cause of the disease.
Areas covered: This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of emerging DMD gene therapies as of 2024. It also discusses the potential of utrophin upregulation, gene editing, and truncated dystrophin as therapeutic strategies. It highlights safety concerns associated with these therapies, including adverse events and patient deaths. A comprehensive overview of developments covers topics such as CRISPR-Cas9 therapies, micro-dystrophin, and the potential delivery of full-length dystrophin.
Expert opinion: The FDA's recent approval of delandistrogene moxeparvovec (Elevidys) underscores the promise of gene replacement therapies for DMD patients. Understanding the mechanisms behind the adverse effects and excluding patients with specific pathogenic variants may enhance the safety profiles of these therapies. CRISPR/Cas9 therapies, while promising, face significant regulatory and safety challenges that hinder their clinical application. Optimal DMD therapies should target both skeletal and cardiac muscles to be effective.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.