社会剥夺指数评分测量的社区特征与产前护理和产科结局的关系。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexa M Sassin, Natalie Osterlund, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Kjersti Aagaard
{"title":"社会剥夺指数评分测量的社区特征与产前护理和产科结局的关系。","authors":"Alexa M Sassin, Natalie Osterlund, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Kjersti Aagaard","doi":"10.1055/a-2507-7371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> We aimed to determine the relationships between socioeconomic disadvantage, as measured by the Social Deprivation Index (SDI), and prenatal care (PNC) utilization, obstetrical outcomes, and neonatal complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> All spontaneously conceived singleton deliveries of nulliparous gravida with residence zip code available (<i>n</i> = 4,786) were identified in a population-based database. Deliveries were assigned SDI scores based on preconception zip code. SDI scores (1-100) are a composite measure of seven community demographic characteristics of poverty, education, transportation, employment, and household composition. SDI scores were categorized into quartiles and grouped for analysis (Q1 [<i>n</i> = 1,342], Q2 + 3 [<i>n</i> = 1,752], and Q4 [<i>n</i> = 1,692]) with higher scores indicative of greater disadvantage. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Among our cohort, gravida in the lowest (least-deprived) SDI quartile (Q1) were older, had lower prepregnancy body mass indices, and were more likely to receive PNC from a physician specializing in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Gravida residing in the highest (most-deprived) SDI quartile (Q4) attended fewer prenatal visits (mean [standard deviation] 11.17 [2.9]) than those living in Q1 (12.04 [2.3], <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Gravida in Q4 were less likely to receive sufficient PNC compared with those in Q1 (52 vs. 64.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and were more likely to fail to achieve appropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) (19.6 in Q4 vs. 15.9% in Q1, <i>p</i> < 0.01). No significant differences in composite maternal (CMM) or neonatal morbidity (CNM) were associated with SDI quartile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Outer quartile social deprivation was associated with higher proportions of primigravida not meeting recommendations for GWG and attending fewer prenatal visits, but it did not affect CMM or CNM. Improving care access and providing nutritional support to all gravida are likely important steps toward health equity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Neighborhood social deprivation was not associated with composite maternal or neonatal morbidity.. · Community-level deprivation was associated with decreased PNC utilization.. · It is important to understand the underlying disparities that lend to suboptimal patterns of PNC.. · Doing so may inform programs that promote favorable birth outcomes in at-risk communities..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Community Characteristics as Measured by Social Deprivation Index Score with Prenatal Care and Obstetrical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa M Sassin, Natalie Osterlund, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Kjersti Aagaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2507-7371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> We aimed to determine the relationships between socioeconomic disadvantage, as measured by the Social Deprivation Index (SDI), and prenatal care (PNC) utilization, obstetrical outcomes, and neonatal complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> All spontaneously conceived singleton deliveries of nulliparous gravida with residence zip code available (<i>n</i> = 4,786) were identified in a population-based database. Deliveries were assigned SDI scores based on preconception zip code. SDI scores (1-100) are a composite measure of seven community demographic characteristics of poverty, education, transportation, employment, and household composition. SDI scores were categorized into quartiles and grouped for analysis (Q1 [<i>n</i> = 1,342], Q2 + 3 [<i>n</i> = 1,752], and Q4 [<i>n</i> = 1,692]) with higher scores indicative of greater disadvantage. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Among our cohort, gravida in the lowest (least-deprived) SDI quartile (Q1) were older, had lower prepregnancy body mass indices, and were more likely to receive PNC from a physician specializing in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Gravida residing in the highest (most-deprived) SDI quartile (Q4) attended fewer prenatal visits (mean [standard deviation] 11.17 [2.9]) than those living in Q1 (12.04 [2.3], <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Gravida in Q4 were less likely to receive sufficient PNC compared with those in Q1 (52 vs. 64.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and were more likely to fail to achieve appropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) (19.6 in Q4 vs. 15.9% in Q1, <i>p</i> < 0.01). No significant differences in composite maternal (CMM) or neonatal morbidity (CNM) were associated with SDI quartile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Outer quartile social deprivation was associated with higher proportions of primigravida not meeting recommendations for GWG and attending fewer prenatal visits, but it did not affect CMM or CNM. Improving care access and providing nutritional support to all gravida are likely important steps toward health equity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Neighborhood social deprivation was not associated with composite maternal or neonatal morbidity.. · Community-level deprivation was associated with decreased PNC utilization.. · It is important to understand the underlying disparities that lend to suboptimal patterns of PNC.. · Doing so may inform programs that promote favorable birth outcomes in at-risk communities..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2507-7371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2507-7371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过社会剥夺指数(SDI)来确定社会经济劣势与产前护理(PNC)利用、产科结局和新生儿并发症之间的关系。研究设计在以人口为基础的数据库中确定所有居住邮政编码可用的无产孕妇(n= 4,786)的单胎自然受孕。根据先入之见的邮政编码,为送货者分配SDI分数。SDI得分(1-100)是对贫困、教育、交通、就业和家庭构成等7个社区人口特征的综合衡量。SDI得分被分为四分位数并分组分析[Q1 (n= 1342), Q2+3 (n= 1752)和Q4 (n= 1692)],得分越高表明劣势越大。采用广义线性混合方法进行统计分析。结果在我们的队列中,SDI最低(最低)四分位数(Q1)的孕妇年龄较大,孕前体重指数较低,并且更有可能从妇产科医生那里接受PNC。生活在最高(最贫困)SDI四分位数(Q4)的孕妇产前就诊次数[平均(标准差)11.17(2.9)]少于生活在Q1的孕妇[12.04 (2.3),p < 0.0001]。与第一季度相比,第4季度的孕妇接受足够PNC的可能性更小(52比64.2%,p < 0.0001),更有可能无法达到适当的妊娠体重增加(GWG)(第4季度19.6比第1季度15.9%,p < 0.01)。复合产妇(CMM)或新生儿发病率(CNM)与SDI四分位数无显著差异。结论外四分位数社会剥夺与未达到GWG推荐值的初生婴儿比例较高和参加产前检查次数较少有关,但对CMM或CNM没有影响。改善护理机会和向所有孕妇提供营养支持可能是实现卫生公平的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Community Characteristics as Measured by Social Deprivation Index Score with Prenatal Care and Obstetrical Outcomes.

Objective:  We aimed to determine the relationships between socioeconomic disadvantage, as measured by the Social Deprivation Index (SDI), and prenatal care (PNC) utilization, obstetrical outcomes, and neonatal complications.

Study design:  All spontaneously conceived singleton deliveries of nulliparous gravida with residence zip code available (n = 4,786) were identified in a population-based database. Deliveries were assigned SDI scores based on preconception zip code. SDI scores (1-100) are a composite measure of seven community demographic characteristics of poverty, education, transportation, employment, and household composition. SDI scores were categorized into quartiles and grouped for analysis (Q1 [n = 1,342], Q2 + 3 [n = 1,752], and Q4 [n = 1,692]) with higher scores indicative of greater disadvantage. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed method.

Results:  Among our cohort, gravida in the lowest (least-deprived) SDI quartile (Q1) were older, had lower prepregnancy body mass indices, and were more likely to receive PNC from a physician specializing in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Gravida residing in the highest (most-deprived) SDI quartile (Q4) attended fewer prenatal visits (mean [standard deviation] 11.17 [2.9]) than those living in Q1 (12.04 [2.3], p < 0.0001). Gravida in Q4 were less likely to receive sufficient PNC compared with those in Q1 (52 vs. 64.2%, p < 0.0001) and were more likely to fail to achieve appropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) (19.6 in Q4 vs. 15.9% in Q1, p < 0.01). No significant differences in composite maternal (CMM) or neonatal morbidity (CNM) were associated with SDI quartile.

Conclusion:  Outer quartile social deprivation was associated with higher proportions of primigravida not meeting recommendations for GWG and attending fewer prenatal visits, but it did not affect CMM or CNM. Improving care access and providing nutritional support to all gravida are likely important steps toward health equity.

Key points: · Neighborhood social deprivation was not associated with composite maternal or neonatal morbidity.. · Community-level deprivation was associated with decreased PNC utilization.. · It is important to understand the underlying disparities that lend to suboptimal patterns of PNC.. · Doing so may inform programs that promote favorable birth outcomes in at-risk communities..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信