利用社区组织建立护理体系:一种混合方法评价。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Catherine DeCarlo Santiago, Jessica Biggs, Jasmine Serrano, Vikki Rompala, Yvita Bustos, Sarah Jolie
{"title":"利用社区组织建立护理体系:一种混合方法评价。","authors":"Catherine DeCarlo Santiago, Jessica Biggs, Jasmine Serrano, Vikki Rompala, Yvita Bustos, Sarah Jolie","doi":"10.1002/ajcp.12775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to utilize mixed methods to evaluate the initial implementation of a system of care (SOC) developed and implemented from a community organizing framework. Surveys were conducted with partners (navigators, community partners, parents) to examine changes pre- and post-implementation of the SOC. Surveys assessed care coordination, effectiveness of communication across organizations, quality of services and relationships, barriers, health-related stressors, and distrust. Surveys were conducted at baseline and follow-up approximately 1 year later. At baseline, 160 parents and 40 community partners completed surveys. At follow-up, 125 parents and 33 community partners participated. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with participating community-based organization staff (n = 10), community navigators (n = 13), school staff (n = 10), and recipients of services (n = 13). Parent surveys suggested promising improvements in care coordination, communication, and quality of services. These results were supported by qualitative themes describing increased communication, care coordination, relationships, and access to services driven by community navigators. Despite these encouraging findings, surveys completed by community partners did not reveal significant changes. Findings must also be understood within the context of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":7576,"journal":{"name":"American journal of community psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using community organizing to build a system of care: A mixed methods evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine DeCarlo Santiago, Jessica Biggs, Jasmine Serrano, Vikki Rompala, Yvita Bustos, Sarah Jolie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajcp.12775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to utilize mixed methods to evaluate the initial implementation of a system of care (SOC) developed and implemented from a community organizing framework. Surveys were conducted with partners (navigators, community partners, parents) to examine changes pre- and post-implementation of the SOC. Surveys assessed care coordination, effectiveness of communication across organizations, quality of services and relationships, barriers, health-related stressors, and distrust. Surveys were conducted at baseline and follow-up approximately 1 year later. At baseline, 160 parents and 40 community partners completed surveys. At follow-up, 125 parents and 33 community partners participated. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with participating community-based organization staff (n = 10), community navigators (n = 13), school staff (n = 10), and recipients of services (n = 13). Parent surveys suggested promising improvements in care coordination, communication, and quality of services. These results were supported by qualitative themes describing increased communication, care coordination, relationships, and access to services driven by community navigators. Despite these encouraging findings, surveys completed by community partners did not reveal significant changes. Findings must also be understood within the context of COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of community psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of community psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12775\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用混合方法来评估从社区组织框架中开发和实施的护理系统(SOC)的初步实施情况。与合作伙伴(导航员、社区合作伙伴、家长)进行了调查,以检查SOC实施前后的变化。调查评估了护理协调、组织间沟通的有效性、服务质量和关系、障碍、与健康有关的压力因素和不信任。调查在基线和随访大约1年后进行。在基线时,160名家长和40名社区伙伴完成了调查。在随访中,有125名家长和33名社区伙伴参与。对参与的社区组织工作人员(n = 10)、社区导航员(n = 13)、学校工作人员(n = 10)和服务接受者(n = 13)进行了定性访谈和焦点小组。家长调查表明,在护理协调、沟通和服务质量方面有希望得到改善。这些结果得到了定性主题的支持,这些主题描述了社区导航员推动的沟通、护理协调、关系和服务获取的增加。尽管有这些令人鼓舞的发现,社区合作伙伴完成的调查并没有显示出显著的变化。还必须在COVID-19的背景下理解调查结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using community organizing to build a system of care: A mixed methods evaluation.

The purpose of this study was to utilize mixed methods to evaluate the initial implementation of a system of care (SOC) developed and implemented from a community organizing framework. Surveys were conducted with partners (navigators, community partners, parents) to examine changes pre- and post-implementation of the SOC. Surveys assessed care coordination, effectiveness of communication across organizations, quality of services and relationships, barriers, health-related stressors, and distrust. Surveys were conducted at baseline and follow-up approximately 1 year later. At baseline, 160 parents and 40 community partners completed surveys. At follow-up, 125 parents and 33 community partners participated. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with participating community-based organization staff (n = 10), community navigators (n = 13), school staff (n = 10), and recipients of services (n = 13). Parent surveys suggested promising improvements in care coordination, communication, and quality of services. These results were supported by qualitative themes describing increased communication, care coordination, relationships, and access to services driven by community navigators. Despite these encouraging findings, surveys completed by community partners did not reveal significant changes. Findings must also be understood within the context of COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; theoretical papers; empirical reviews; reports of innovative community programs or policies; and first person accounts of stakeholders involved in research, programs, or policy. The journal encourages submissions of innovative multi-level research and interventions, and encourages international submissions. The journal also encourages the submission of manuscripts concerned with underrepresented populations and issues of human diversity. The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes research, theory, and descriptions of innovative interventions on a wide range of topics, including, but not limited to: individual, family, peer, and community mental health, physical health, and substance use; risk and protective factors for health and well being; educational, legal, and work environment processes, policies, and opportunities; social ecological approaches, including the interplay of individual family, peer, institutional, neighborhood, and community processes; social welfare, social justice, and human rights; social problems and social change; program, system, and policy evaluations; and, understanding people within their social, cultural, economic, geographic, and historical contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信