{"title":"粪便标本中艰难梭菌抗原和毒素a /B同时检测快速诊断试剂盒CD GDH/TOX的评价","authors":"Nohara Tsukamoto, Yumiko Funashima, Norito Yoshida, Airi Ishikawa, Taeko Narita, Shoko Iyonaga, Hisae Nakashima, Kenichi Sato, Kentaro Wakamatsu, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections, highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test kits are necessary for prompt diagnose and infection control. In this study, we evaluated \"Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX\" (evaluation kit), a rapid diagnostic kit for <i>C. difficile</i>, using 65 clinical stool specimens, comparing with GE test immunochromato-CD GDH/TOX \"Nissui\" (GE test) and TECHLAB <i>C. DIFF</i> QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QUIK CHEK). The results of the evaluation kit showed a high concordance rate; 100% the positive concordance rate (31/31) and 97.1% the negative concordance rate (33/34) of GDH, 94.1% the positive concordance rate (16/17) and 97.9% the negative concordance rate (47/48) of toxin against GE test, respectively. Also 96.9% the positive concordance rate (31/32) and 97.0% the negative concordance rate (32/33) of GDH, 100% the positive concordance rate (12/12) and 90.6% the negative concordance rate (48/53) of toxin against QUIK CHEK, respectively. Additionally, comparison of discrepancy cases between kits based on Nucleic Acid Amplification test, one false negative each for GDH and toxin in the evaluation kit, two false negatives for GDH and one false negative for toxin in the GE test, one false negative for GDH and six false negatives for toxin in QUIK CHEK, and no false positive cases were observed. Therefore, the detection sensitivity of GDH and toxin of the evaluation kit was equivalent to that of two types of comparative kits.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX, a Rapid Diagnostic Kit for Simultaneous Detection of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Antigen and Toxin A/B, in Fecal Specimens].\",\"authors\":\"Nohara Tsukamoto, Yumiko Funashima, Norito Yoshida, Airi Ishikawa, Taeko Narita, Shoko Iyonaga, Hisae Nakashima, Kenichi Sato, Kentaro Wakamatsu, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections, highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test kits are necessary for prompt diagnose and infection control. In this study, we evaluated \\\"Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX\\\" (evaluation kit), a rapid diagnostic kit for <i>C. difficile</i>, using 65 clinical stool specimens, comparing with GE test immunochromato-CD GDH/TOX \\\"Nissui\\\" (GE test) and TECHLAB <i>C. DIFF</i> QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QUIK CHEK). The results of the evaluation kit showed a high concordance rate; 100% the positive concordance rate (31/31) and 97.1% the negative concordance rate (33/34) of GDH, 94.1% the positive concordance rate (16/17) and 97.9% the negative concordance rate (47/48) of toxin against GE test, respectively. Also 96.9% the positive concordance rate (31/32) and 97.0% the negative concordance rate (32/33) of GDH, 100% the positive concordance rate (12/12) and 90.6% the negative concordance rate (48/53) of toxin against QUIK CHEK, respectively. Additionally, comparison of discrepancy cases between kits based on Nucleic Acid Amplification test, one false negative each for GDH and toxin in the evaluation kit, two false negatives for GDH and one false negative for toxin in the GE test, one false negative for GDH and six false negatives for toxin in QUIK CHEK, and no false positive cases were observed. Therefore, the detection sensitivity of GDH and toxin of the evaluation kit was equivalent to that of two types of comparative kits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于艰难梭菌感染,需要高灵敏度的快速诊断试剂盒,以便及时诊断和控制感染。本研究利用65份临床粪便标本,对艰难梭菌快速诊断试剂盒“Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX”(评估试剂盒)进行评价,并与GE test免疫色谱-CD GDH/TOX“Nissui”(GE test)和TECHLAB C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QUIK CHEK)进行比较。评价试剂盒的结果具有较高的一致性;GDH阳性符合率为100%(31/31),阴性符合率为97.1% (33/34),GE毒素检测符合率为94.1%(16/17),阴性符合率为97.9%(47/48)。GDH的阳性符合率为96.9%(31/32),阴性符合率为97.0%(32/33),毒素对QUIK CHEK的阳性符合率为100%(12/12),阴性符合率为90.6%(48/53)。核酸扩增检测试剂盒间差异病例比较,评价试剂盒GDH和毒素各1例假阴性,GE检测GDH假阴性和毒素假阴性各2例,QUIK CHEK检测GDH假阴性和毒素假阴性各1例,无假阳性病例。因此,评价试剂盒对GDH和毒素的检测灵敏度与两种比较试剂盒相当。
[Evaluation of Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX, a Rapid Diagnostic Kit for Simultaneous Detection of Clostridioides difficile Antigen and Toxin A/B, in Fecal Specimens].
For Clostridioides difficile infections, highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test kits are necessary for prompt diagnose and infection control. In this study, we evaluated "Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX" (evaluation kit), a rapid diagnostic kit for C. difficile, using 65 clinical stool specimens, comparing with GE test immunochromato-CD GDH/TOX "Nissui" (GE test) and TECHLAB C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QUIK CHEK). The results of the evaluation kit showed a high concordance rate; 100% the positive concordance rate (31/31) and 97.1% the negative concordance rate (33/34) of GDH, 94.1% the positive concordance rate (16/17) and 97.9% the negative concordance rate (47/48) of toxin against GE test, respectively. Also 96.9% the positive concordance rate (31/32) and 97.0% the negative concordance rate (32/33) of GDH, 100% the positive concordance rate (12/12) and 90.6% the negative concordance rate (48/53) of toxin against QUIK CHEK, respectively. Additionally, comparison of discrepancy cases between kits based on Nucleic Acid Amplification test, one false negative each for GDH and toxin in the evaluation kit, two false negatives for GDH and one false negative for toxin in the GE test, one false negative for GDH and six false negatives for toxin in QUIK CHEK, and no false positive cases were observed. Therefore, the detection sensitivity of GDH and toxin of the evaluation kit was equivalent to that of two types of comparative kits.