Biagio Barone, Ugo Amicuzi, Matteo Massanova, Luigi Napolitano, Pasquale Reccia, Benito Fabio Mirto, Raffaele Balsamo, Francesco Del Giudice, Matteo Ferro, Gian Maria Busetto, Octavian Sabin Tataru, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Celeste Manfredi, Dario Del Biondo, Vincenzo Francesco Caputo, Roberto Falabella, Ferdinando Fusco, Ciro Imbimbo, Felice Crocetto
{"title":"体重指数与前列腺体积的相关性：前列腺癌患者术前和术后测量的回顾性分析。","authors":"Biagio Barone, Ugo Amicuzi, Matteo Massanova, Luigi Napolitano, Pasquale Reccia, Benito Fabio Mirto, Raffaele Balsamo, Francesco Del Giudice, Matteo Ferro, Gian Maria Busetto, Octavian Sabin Tataru, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Celeste Manfredi, Dario Del Biondo, Vincenzo Francesco Caputo, Roberto Falabella, Ferdinando Fusco, Ciro Imbimbo, Felice Crocetto","doi":"10.1002/pros.24845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and prostate volume, utilizing pre and postoperative measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single site using data from an institutional database. Medical records of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were reviewed. Data included age, BMI, and prostate volumes measured through digital rectal exam (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and surgical specimen weight (SPW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Spearman's correlation test revealed a significant association between BMI and prostate volume for all measurement methods, reporting r = 0.146 (p = 0.047) for DRE, r = 0.268 (p < 0.0001) for TRUS, r = 0.177 (p = 0.021) for MRI and r = 0.234 (p = 0.002) for SPW. Linear regression analysis confirmed the significant association between BMI and prostate volume, reporting, respectively, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.026 (p = 0.036) for DRE, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.076 (p < 0.0001) for TRUS, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.038 (p = 0.011) for MRI and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.040 (p = 0.009) for SPW. Notably, considering the SPW the best way to estimate prostate volume, for every increase in BMI, the predicted increase of prostate volume is 0.865gr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates a positive linear correlation between BMI and prostate volume, highlighting the importance of considering BMI in prostate volume assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Prostate Volume: A Retrospective Analysis of Pre and Postoperative Measurements in Prostate Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Biagio Barone, Ugo Amicuzi, Matteo Massanova, Luigi Napolitano, Pasquale Reccia, Benito Fabio Mirto, Raffaele Balsamo, Francesco Del Giudice, Matteo Ferro, Gian Maria Busetto, Octavian Sabin Tataru, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Celeste Manfredi, Dario Del Biondo, Vincenzo Francesco Caputo, Roberto Falabella, Ferdinando Fusco, Ciro Imbimbo, Felice Crocetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.24845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and prostate volume, utilizing pre and postoperative measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single site using data from an institutional database. Medical records of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were reviewed. Data included age, BMI, and prostate volumes measured through digital rectal exam (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and surgical specimen weight (SPW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Spearman's correlation test revealed a significant association between BMI and prostate volume for all measurement methods, reporting r = 0.146 (p = 0.047) for DRE, r = 0.268 (p < 0.0001) for TRUS, r = 0.177 (p = 0.021) for MRI and r = 0.234 (p = 0.002) for SPW. Linear regression analysis confirmed the significant association between BMI and prostate volume, reporting, respectively, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.026 (p = 0.036) for DRE, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.076 (p < 0.0001) for TRUS, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.038 (p = 0.011) for MRI and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.040 (p = 0.009) for SPW. Notably, considering the SPW the best way to estimate prostate volume, for every increase in BMI, the predicted increase of prostate volume is 0.865gr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates a positive linear correlation between BMI and prostate volume, highlighting the importance of considering BMI in prostate volume assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24845\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24845","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Prostate Volume: A Retrospective Analysis of Pre and Postoperative Measurements in Prostate Cancer Patients.
Background: This study aims to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and prostate volume, utilizing pre and postoperative measurements.
Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single site using data from an institutional database. Medical records of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were reviewed. Data included age, BMI, and prostate volumes measured through digital rectal exam (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and surgical specimen weight (SPW).
Results: A total of 168 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Spearman's correlation test revealed a significant association between BMI and prostate volume for all measurement methods, reporting r = 0.146 (p = 0.047) for DRE, r = 0.268 (p < 0.0001) for TRUS, r = 0.177 (p = 0.021) for MRI and r = 0.234 (p = 0.002) for SPW. Linear regression analysis confirmed the significant association between BMI and prostate volume, reporting, respectively, R2 = 0.026 (p = 0.036) for DRE, R2 = 0.076 (p < 0.0001) for TRUS, R2 = 0.038 (p = 0.011) for MRI and R2 = 0.040 (p = 0.009) for SPW. Notably, considering the SPW the best way to estimate prostate volume, for every increase in BMI, the predicted increase of prostate volume is 0.865gr.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates a positive linear correlation between BMI and prostate volume, highlighting the importance of considering BMI in prostate volume assessments.
期刊介绍：
The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
