Stephan Schaller, Ingrid Michon, Vanessa Baier, Frederico Severino Martins, Patrick Nolain, Amit Taneja
{"title":"利用基于生理的药代动力学模型评估甲氨蝶呤和环孢素A之间bcrp相关的ddi。","authors":"Stephan Schaller, Ingrid Michon, Vanessa Baier, Frederico Severino Martins, Patrick Nolain, Amit Taneja","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00495-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>This study provides a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based analysis of the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) between cyclosporin A (CsA), a breast cancer resistance protein transporter (BCRP) inhibitor, and methotrexate (MTX), a putative BCRP substrate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PBPK models for CsA and MTX were built using open-source tools and published data for both model building and for model verification and validation. The MTX and CsA PBPK models were evaluated for their application in simulating BCRP-related DDIs. A qualification of an introduced empirical uniform in vitro scaling factor of K<sub>i</sub> values for transporter inhibition by CsA was conducted by using a previously developed model of rosuvastatin (sensitive index BCRP substrate), and assessing if corresponding DDI ratios were well captured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the simulated DDI scenarios for MTX in the presence of CsA, the developed models could capture the observed changes in PK parameters as changes in the area under the curve ratios (area under the curve during DDI/area under the curve control) of 1.30 versus 1.31 observed and the DDI peak plasma concentration ratios (peak plasma concentration during DDI/peak plasma concentration control) of 1.07 versus 1.28 observed. The originally reported in vitro K<sub>i</sub> values of CsA were scaled with the uniform qualified scaling factor for their use in the in vivo DDI simulations to correct for the low intracellular unbound fraction of the CsA effector concentration. The resulting predicted versus observed ratios of peak plasma concentration and area under the curve DDI ratios with MTX were 0.82 and 0.99, respectively, indicating adequate model accuracy and choice of a scaling factor to capture the observed DDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All models have been comprehensively documented and made publicly available as tools to support the drug development and clinical research community and further community-driven model development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of BCRP-Related DDIs Between Methotrexate and Cyclosporin A Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Schaller, Ingrid Michon, Vanessa Baier, Frederico Severino Martins, Patrick Nolain, Amit Taneja\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40268-024-00495-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>This study provides a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based analysis of the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) between cyclosporin A (CsA), a breast cancer resistance protein transporter (BCRP) inhibitor, and methotrexate (MTX), a putative BCRP substrate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PBPK models for CsA and MTX were built using open-source tools and published data for both model building and for model verification and validation. The MTX and CsA PBPK models were evaluated for their application in simulating BCRP-related DDIs. A qualification of an introduced empirical uniform in vitro scaling factor of K<sub>i</sub> values for transporter inhibition by CsA was conducted by using a previously developed model of rosuvastatin (sensitive index BCRP substrate), and assessing if corresponding DDI ratios were well captured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the simulated DDI scenarios for MTX in the presence of CsA, the developed models could capture the observed changes in PK parameters as changes in the area under the curve ratios (area under the curve during DDI/area under the curve control) of 1.30 versus 1.31 observed and the DDI peak plasma concentration ratios (peak plasma concentration during DDI/peak plasma concentration control) of 1.07 versus 1.28 observed. The originally reported in vitro K<sub>i</sub> values of CsA were scaled with the uniform qualified scaling factor for their use in the in vivo DDI simulations to correct for the low intracellular unbound fraction of the CsA effector concentration. The resulting predicted versus observed ratios of peak plasma concentration and area under the curve DDI ratios with MTX were 0.82 and 0.99, respectively, indicating adequate model accuracy and choice of a scaling factor to capture the observed DDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All models have been comprehensively documented and made publicly available as tools to support the drug development and clinical research community and further community-driven model development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00495-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00495-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:本研究基于生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型分析了环孢素a (CsA)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)之间潜在的药物-药物相互作用(DDI)。环孢素a是一种乳腺癌耐药蛋白转运蛋白(BCRP)抑制剂,甲氨蝶呤是一种假定的BCRP底物。方法:使用开源工具和公开数据构建CsA和MTX的PBPK模型,用于模型构建和模型验证。评估了MTX和CsA PBPK模型在模拟bcrp相关ddi中的应用。通过使用先前开发的瑞舒伐他汀(敏感指数BCRP底物)模型,并评估是否能够很好地捕获相应的DDI比率,对CsA对转运蛋白抑制的经验统一的体外比例因子Ki值进行了鉴定。结果:在CsA存在的MTX DDI模拟情况下,所建立的模型可以捕捉到PK参数的变化,曲线下面积比(DDI期间的曲线下面积/曲线下面积)为1.30 vs 1.31, DDI峰值血浆浓度比(DDI期间的血浆浓度峰值/血浆浓度峰值)为1.07 vs 1.28。最初报道的CsA的体外Ki值用统一的合格比例因子进行缩放,以便在体内DDI模拟中使用,以纠正CsA效应物浓度的低细胞内未结合部分。结果预测的峰值血浆浓度和曲线下DDI比与MTX的比值分别为0.82和0.99,表明模型具有足够的准确性,并且选择了一个比例因子来捕获观察到的DDI。结论:所有模型都已被全面记录并公开提供,作为支持药物开发和临床研究界以及进一步社区驱动的模型开发的工具。
Evaluation of BCRP-Related DDIs Between Methotrexate and Cyclosporin A Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.
Background and objective: This study provides a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based analysis of the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) between cyclosporin A (CsA), a breast cancer resistance protein transporter (BCRP) inhibitor, and methotrexate (MTX), a putative BCRP substrate.
Methods: PBPK models for CsA and MTX were built using open-source tools and published data for both model building and for model verification and validation. The MTX and CsA PBPK models were evaluated for their application in simulating BCRP-related DDIs. A qualification of an introduced empirical uniform in vitro scaling factor of Ki values for transporter inhibition by CsA was conducted by using a previously developed model of rosuvastatin (sensitive index BCRP substrate), and assessing if corresponding DDI ratios were well captured.
Results: Within the simulated DDI scenarios for MTX in the presence of CsA, the developed models could capture the observed changes in PK parameters as changes in the area under the curve ratios (area under the curve during DDI/area under the curve control) of 1.30 versus 1.31 observed and the DDI peak plasma concentration ratios (peak plasma concentration during DDI/peak plasma concentration control) of 1.07 versus 1.28 observed. The originally reported in vitro Ki values of CsA were scaled with the uniform qualified scaling factor for their use in the in vivo DDI simulations to correct for the low intracellular unbound fraction of the CsA effector concentration. The resulting predicted versus observed ratios of peak plasma concentration and area under the curve DDI ratios with MTX were 0.82 and 0.99, respectively, indicating adequate model accuracy and choice of a scaling factor to capture the observed DDI.
Conclusions: All models have been comprehensively documented and made publicly available as tools to support the drug development and clinical research community and further community-driven model development.
期刊介绍:
Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy.
The Journal includes:
Clinical research on new and established drugs;
Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development;
Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered;
Reviews may also be considered.