慢性病患者初级保健的跨专业合作:范围综述、领导和追随关系。

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Guoyang Zhang, Renée E Stalmeijer, Fury Maulina, Frank W J M Smeenk, Carolin Sehlbach
{"title":"慢性病患者初级保健的跨专业合作:范围综述、领导和追随关系。","authors":"Guoyang Zhang, Renée E Stalmeijer, Fury Maulina, Frank W J M Smeenk, Carolin Sehlbach","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-001102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in primary care is essential in providing high-quality care for patients with chronic illness. However, the traditional role-based leadership approach may hinder IPC. Instead, physicians should also take followership roles, allowing other healthcare team members (OHCTMs) to lead when they have expertise and/or experience. Understanding of leadership and followership within IPC remains limited in primary care for patients with chronic illness. Hence, this review aims to explore the definitions and conceptualisations of leadership and followership and to map relevant training in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, an electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Three independent reviewers assessed publications for eligibility. Descriptive and thematic analysis were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2194 identified articles, 57 were included. Only two articles defined leadership approaches, and none explicitly addressed followership. Nevertheless, our analysis identified leadership shifts from physicians to OHCTMs, and vice versa for followership, driven by complexity of care, physician shortages and healthcare costs. Enablers of these shifts included physician trusting OHCTMs, collaborative practice agreements and physicians' interprofessional experience. Barriers included traditional hierarchies, OHCTMs' lack of competence and physicians' lack of IPC experience. Four articles mentioned relevant training however without detailed information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Leadership in IPC for chronic illness in primary care is rarely defined, and followership is largely neglected. Nevertheless, leadership-followership shifts do occur in leadership and followership roles of physicians and OHCTMs. Further research needs to explore physicians' followership and relevant competencies, and relevant training is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional collaboration in primary care for patients with chronic illness: a scoping review mapping leadership and followership.\",\"authors\":\"Guoyang Zhang, Renée E Stalmeijer, Fury Maulina, Frank W J M Smeenk, Carolin Sehlbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/leader-2024-001102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in primary care is essential in providing high-quality care for patients with chronic illness. However, the traditional role-based leadership approach may hinder IPC. Instead, physicians should also take followership roles, allowing other healthcare team members (OHCTMs) to lead when they have expertise and/or experience. Understanding of leadership and followership within IPC remains limited in primary care for patients with chronic illness. Hence, this review aims to explore the definitions and conceptualisations of leadership and followership and to map relevant training in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, an electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Three independent reviewers assessed publications for eligibility. Descriptive and thematic analysis were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2194 identified articles, 57 were included. Only two articles defined leadership approaches, and none explicitly addressed followership. Nevertheless, our analysis identified leadership shifts from physicians to OHCTMs, and vice versa for followership, driven by complexity of care, physician shortages and healthcare costs. Enablers of these shifts included physician trusting OHCTMs, collaborative practice agreements and physicians' interprofessional experience. Barriers included traditional hierarchies, OHCTMs' lack of competence and physicians' lack of IPC experience. Four articles mentioned relevant training however without detailed information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Leadership in IPC for chronic illness in primary care is rarely defined, and followership is largely neglected. Nevertheless, leadership-followership shifts do occur in leadership and followership roles of physicians and OHCTMs. Further research needs to explore physicians' followership and relevant competencies, and relevant training is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:初级保健中有效的跨专业合作(IPC)对于为慢性病患者提供高质量的护理至关重要。然而,传统的基于角色的领导方法可能会阻碍IPC。相反,医生也应该扮演跟随者的角色,当其他医疗团队成员(ohctm)有专业知识和/或经验时,允许他们领导。在慢性病患者的初级保健中,对IPC内的领导和追随者的了解仍然有限。因此,本综述旨在探讨领导力和追随性的定义和概念,并在此背景下绘制相关培训图。方法:按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行范围审查,在PubMed, Embase和Web of Science上进行电子搜索。三名独立审稿人评估了出版物的资格。采用了描述性和专题分析。结果:从鉴定的2194篇文章中,纳入57篇。只有两篇文章定义了领导方法,没有一篇明确提到了追随者。然而,我们的分析发现,在护理的复杂性、医生短缺和医疗成本的驱动下,领导力从医生转移到ohctm,反之亦然。这些转变的推动者包括医生对ohctm的信任、合作实践协议和医生的跨专业经验。障碍包括传统的等级制度、OHCTMs缺乏能力和医生缺乏IPC经验。有四篇文章提到了相关培训,但没有详细介绍。讨论:在初级保健中,慢性疾病的IPC领导很少得到界定,并且很大程度上忽视了随访。然而,领导-追随的转变确实发生在医生和ohctm的领导和追随角色中。进一步的研究需要探索医生的追随性和相关能力,并需要进行相关的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interprofessional collaboration in primary care for patients with chronic illness: a scoping review mapping leadership and followership.

Background: Effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in primary care is essential in providing high-quality care for patients with chronic illness. However, the traditional role-based leadership approach may hinder IPC. Instead, physicians should also take followership roles, allowing other healthcare team members (OHCTMs) to lead when they have expertise and/or experience. Understanding of leadership and followership within IPC remains limited in primary care for patients with chronic illness. Hence, this review aims to explore the definitions and conceptualisations of leadership and followership and to map relevant training in this context.

Methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, an electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Three independent reviewers assessed publications for eligibility. Descriptive and thematic analysis were employed.

Results: From 2194 identified articles, 57 were included. Only two articles defined leadership approaches, and none explicitly addressed followership. Nevertheless, our analysis identified leadership shifts from physicians to OHCTMs, and vice versa for followership, driven by complexity of care, physician shortages and healthcare costs. Enablers of these shifts included physician trusting OHCTMs, collaborative practice agreements and physicians' interprofessional experience. Barriers included traditional hierarchies, OHCTMs' lack of competence and physicians' lack of IPC experience. Four articles mentioned relevant training however without detailed information.

Discussion: Leadership in IPC for chronic illness in primary care is rarely defined, and followership is largely neglected. Nevertheless, leadership-followership shifts do occur in leadership and followership roles of physicians and OHCTMs. Further research needs to explore physicians' followership and relevant competencies, and relevant training is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信