{"title":"啮齿动物发情周期模式:协调周期评价与解释。","authors":"Shivakumar Holalagoudar, Susan Kisielewski, Austin Martini, Kamin Johnson, Anne-Laure Leoni, Corinna Demminger, Sonja Brosel","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The estrous cycle is a sensitive endpoint from an endocrine disruptor perspective and is included in rodent reproductive toxicity studies. In this paper, the methods for estrous cycle timing and different approaches followed by testing laboratories for evaluating the days of the estrous cycle were reviewed. No major differences are identified for counting 4-day estrous cycle. However, when extended episodes of estrus (E) stages occur, the cycle counting differs between testing laboratories potentially resulting in misinterpretation and inaccurate outcome. Appearance of extended episodes of two to three E in an estrous cycle need explanation. Therefore, the following are proposed, 1) follow OECD guidance document for normal 4/5 day cycles, 2) recommends an update of the OECD document as in the current one it is unclear for a 5-day cycle ending with Proestrus(P) followed by episode(s) of estrus(E), 3) two episodes of E after P in a 5-day cycle and three consecutive episodes of E should be considered abnormal, and 4) stages prior to first E of the first cycle or after last E (last P of a 5-day) of last cycle should not be assumed a complete cycle. Additionally, call for collaboration is made to harmonize the cycle counting approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rodent estrous cycle pattern: Harmonizing the cycle evaluation and interpretation.\",\"authors\":\"Shivakumar Holalagoudar, Susan Kisielewski, Austin Martini, Kamin Johnson, Anne-Laure Leoni, Corinna Demminger, Sonja Brosel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The estrous cycle is a sensitive endpoint from an endocrine disruptor perspective and is included in rodent reproductive toxicity studies. In this paper, the methods for estrous cycle timing and different approaches followed by testing laboratories for evaluating the days of the estrous cycle were reviewed. No major differences are identified for counting 4-day estrous cycle. However, when extended episodes of estrus (E) stages occur, the cycle counting differs between testing laboratories potentially resulting in misinterpretation and inaccurate outcome. Appearance of extended episodes of two to three E in an estrous cycle need explanation. Therefore, the following are proposed, 1) follow OECD guidance document for normal 4/5 day cycles, 2) recommends an update of the OECD document as in the current one it is unclear for a 5-day cycle ending with Proestrus(P) followed by episode(s) of estrus(E), 3) two episodes of E after P in a 5-day cycle and three consecutive episodes of E should be considered abnormal, and 4) stages prior to first E of the first cycle or after last E (last P of a 5-day) of last cycle should not be assumed a complete cycle. Additionally, call for collaboration is made to harmonize the cycle counting approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105768\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rodent estrous cycle pattern: Harmonizing the cycle evaluation and interpretation.
The estrous cycle is a sensitive endpoint from an endocrine disruptor perspective and is included in rodent reproductive toxicity studies. In this paper, the methods for estrous cycle timing and different approaches followed by testing laboratories for evaluating the days of the estrous cycle were reviewed. No major differences are identified for counting 4-day estrous cycle. However, when extended episodes of estrus (E) stages occur, the cycle counting differs between testing laboratories potentially resulting in misinterpretation and inaccurate outcome. Appearance of extended episodes of two to three E in an estrous cycle need explanation. Therefore, the following are proposed, 1) follow OECD guidance document for normal 4/5 day cycles, 2) recommends an update of the OECD document as in the current one it is unclear for a 5-day cycle ending with Proestrus(P) followed by episode(s) of estrus(E), 3) two episodes of E after P in a 5-day cycle and three consecutive episodes of E should be considered abnormal, and 4) stages prior to first E of the first cycle or after last E (last P of a 5-day) of last cycle should not be assumed a complete cycle. Additionally, call for collaboration is made to harmonize the cycle counting approach.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)