六家美国联邦合格医疗中心covid -19前至封锁后产后就诊和避孕率的变化

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rebecca K Campbell, Emma Gray, Rachel Caskey, Cristina Barkowski, Jena Wallander Gemkow, Nivedita Mohanty, Kristin Rankin, Sadia Haider
{"title":"六家美国联邦合格医疗中心covid -19前至封锁后产后就诊和避孕率的变化","authors":"Rebecca K Campbell, Emma Gray, Rachel Caskey, Cristina Barkowski, Jena Wallander Gemkow, Nivedita Mohanty, Kristin Rankin, Sadia Haider","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Postpartum care, including contraception, benefits maternal health and decreases mortality, which increased in the United States with COVID-19. Pandemic disruptions to postpartum health care access in vulnerable populations are not well understood. We utilize electronic health record (EHR) data for prenatal patients (<i>n</i> = 2,265) at six urban Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) from one year prepandemic (January 1, 2019) through one year after the first stay-at-home orders (\"lockdown\") (March 31, 2021). <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We investigated (1) changes in rates of postpartum visit (PPV) and postpartum contraception receipt in the post-lockdown versus prepandemic periods and (2) characteristics predictive of differential changes in PPV and contraception rates. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Visit and prescription records from EHR were used to classify if patients received PPV and most/moderately effective contraception within 60 days postpartum, analyzed separately and as a composite variable: PPV and contraception, PPV only, or no PPV. Risk differences comparing post-lockdown with pre-COVID-19 pandemic were estimated using binomial regression and generalized logistic regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, language, and clinical site. Effect modification by sociodemographic and clinical covariates was examined. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Total patient volume fell 21% in the post-lockdown versus pre-COVID-19 period. Rates of PPV decreased in absolute terms by 9.6 (95% confidence interval: -13.6, -5.6) and contraception by 8.1 (-13.3, -2.8) percentage points. After adjustment, PPV and contraception decreased by 9.3 percentage points (-13.1, -5.4), while PPV only was stable (-0.4 [-4.3, 3.6]). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These findings suggest a substantial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum care in FQHCs and community health centers. Supply and demand drivers require further examination to inform strategies to improve postpartum care access and subsequent maternal health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in Postpartum Visit and Contraception Rates Pre-COVID-19 to Post-Lockdown in Six U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca K Campbell, Emma Gray, Rachel Caskey, Cristina Barkowski, Jena Wallander Gemkow, Nivedita Mohanty, Kristin Rankin, Sadia Haider\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.0691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Postpartum care, including contraception, benefits maternal health and decreases mortality, which increased in the United States with COVID-19. Pandemic disruptions to postpartum health care access in vulnerable populations are not well understood. We utilize electronic health record (EHR) data for prenatal patients (<i>n</i> = 2,265) at six urban Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) from one year prepandemic (January 1, 2019) through one year after the first stay-at-home orders (\\\"lockdown\\\") (March 31, 2021). <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We investigated (1) changes in rates of postpartum visit (PPV) and postpartum contraception receipt in the post-lockdown versus prepandemic periods and (2) characteristics predictive of differential changes in PPV and contraception rates. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Visit and prescription records from EHR were used to classify if patients received PPV and most/moderately effective contraception within 60 days postpartum, analyzed separately and as a composite variable: PPV and contraception, PPV only, or no PPV. Risk differences comparing post-lockdown with pre-COVID-19 pandemic were estimated using binomial regression and generalized logistic regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, language, and clinical site. Effect modification by sociodemographic and clinical covariates was examined. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Total patient volume fell 21% in the post-lockdown versus pre-COVID-19 period. Rates of PPV decreased in absolute terms by 9.6 (95% confidence interval: -13.6, -5.6) and contraception by 8.1 (-13.3, -2.8) percentage points. After adjustment, PPV and contraception decreased by 9.3 percentage points (-13.1, -5.4), while PPV only was stable (-0.4 [-4.3, 3.6]). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These findings suggest a substantial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum care in FQHCs and community health centers. Supply and demand drivers require further examination to inform strategies to improve postpartum care access and subsequent maternal health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0691\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:包括避孕在内的产后护理有利于孕产妇健康并降低死亡率,这在美国因COVID-19而增加。大流行对脆弱人群获得产后保健服务的影响尚不清楚。我们利用6个城市联邦合格医疗中心(fqhc)的产前患者(n = 2265)的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,时间从大流行前一年(2019年1月1日)到首次居家令(“封锁”)后一年(2021年3月31日)。目的:我们调查了(1)封锁后与大流行前期间产后探视率(PPV)和产后避孕收药率的变化,以及(2)预测PPV和避孕率差异变化的特征。材料与方法:使用电子病历中的就诊记录和处方记录,对产后60天内患者是否接受了PPV和最有效/中等有效的避孕措施进行分类,并单独分析,并作为复合变量:PPV和避孕,仅PPV,或无PPV。使用二项回归和广义逻辑回归模型,根据年龄、种族/民族、语言和临床地点进行调整,估计封锁后与covid -19大流行前的风险差异。研究了社会人口学和临床协变量对效果的影响。结果:与covid -19前相比,封锁后的总患者量下降了21%。PPV的绝对比率下降了9.6个百分点(95%可信区间:-13.6,-5.6),避孕率下降了8.1个百分点(-13.3,-2.8)。调整后,PPV和避孕下降了9.3个百分点(-13.1,-5.4),而PPV仅保持稳定(-0.4[-4.3,3.6])。结论:这些发现表明COVID-19大流行对fqhc和社区卫生中心的产后护理产生了实质性影响。需要进一步检查供需驱动因素,以便为改善产后护理机会和随后的孕产妇保健结果的战略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change in Postpartum Visit and Contraception Rates Pre-COVID-19 to Post-Lockdown in Six U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Background: Postpartum care, including contraception, benefits maternal health and decreases mortality, which increased in the United States with COVID-19. Pandemic disruptions to postpartum health care access in vulnerable populations are not well understood. We utilize electronic health record (EHR) data for prenatal patients (n = 2,265) at six urban Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) from one year prepandemic (January 1, 2019) through one year after the first stay-at-home orders ("lockdown") (March 31, 2021). Objective: We investigated (1) changes in rates of postpartum visit (PPV) and postpartum contraception receipt in the post-lockdown versus prepandemic periods and (2) characteristics predictive of differential changes in PPV and contraception rates. Materials and Methods: Visit and prescription records from EHR were used to classify if patients received PPV and most/moderately effective contraception within 60 days postpartum, analyzed separately and as a composite variable: PPV and contraception, PPV only, or no PPV. Risk differences comparing post-lockdown with pre-COVID-19 pandemic were estimated using binomial regression and generalized logistic regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, language, and clinical site. Effect modification by sociodemographic and clinical covariates was examined. Results: Total patient volume fell 21% in the post-lockdown versus pre-COVID-19 period. Rates of PPV decreased in absolute terms by 9.6 (95% confidence interval: -13.6, -5.6) and contraception by 8.1 (-13.3, -2.8) percentage points. After adjustment, PPV and contraception decreased by 9.3 percentage points (-13.1, -5.4), while PPV only was stable (-0.4 [-4.3, 3.6]). Conclusions: These findings suggest a substantial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum care in FQHCs and community health centers. Supply and demand drivers require further examination to inform strategies to improve postpartum care access and subsequent maternal health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信