全膀胱放射治疗的患者特异性适应性规划裕度。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhexuan Zhang, Chieh-Wen Liu, Jeremy D Donaghue, Eric J Murray, Omar Mian, Ping Xia
{"title":"全膀胱放射治疗的患者特异性适应性规划裕度。","authors":"Zhexuan Zhang, Chieh-Wen Liu, Jeremy D Donaghue, Eric J Murray, Omar Mian, Ping Xia","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole bladder irradiation is an organ preservation treatment approach for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Conventional planning margins, typically 15-20 mm, increase normal tissue toxicity and limit possible dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to develop a patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation to minimize the planning target volume (PTV) while preserving adequate dose coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen patients who received whole-bladder irradiation were retrospectively selected for this study. We proposed a patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margin recipe, derived from the first five fractions of kV-CBCTs, to account for inter-fractional bladder changes. This recipe was validated using kV-CBCTs from fractions six to ten and the final five fractions. The goal was to achieve a residual volume, defined as the percentage of daily bladder volume (V<sub>daily</sub>) outside the PTV, of less than 5%. Adaptive and conventional plans were created using proposed and conventional margins, respectively. A dosimetric comparison of targets and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(V<sub>daily</sub>) decreased throughout the treatment course. The most notable inter-fractional bladder variations were in the superior and anterior directions. The patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margins, averaging 6 mm (± 2.9 mm), achieved a residual volume of less than 5%. Compared to conventional planning, the adaptive approach reduced PTV volume by an average of 135.3 cc (± 46.6 cc). A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was identified between residual volume and adaptive margins in the anterior, superior, left, and right directions. Using the proposed adaptive margins, the median residual volume was 0.71% (interquartile range 0.09%-3.55%), and the median (V<sub>daily</sub>) receiving the prescribed dose was 99.1% (interquartile range 95.3%-99.9%). Adaptive plans demonstrated superior OAR sparing compared to conventional plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation resulted in margins smaller than conventional ones, optimized normal tissue sparing, and maintained adequate PTV coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-specific adaptive planning margin for whole bladder radiation therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Zhexuan Zhang, Chieh-Wen Liu, Jeremy D Donaghue, Eric J Murray, Omar Mian, Ping Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole bladder irradiation is an organ preservation treatment approach for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Conventional planning margins, typically 15-20 mm, increase normal tissue toxicity and limit possible dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to develop a patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation to minimize the planning target volume (PTV) while preserving adequate dose coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen patients who received whole-bladder irradiation were retrospectively selected for this study. We proposed a patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margin recipe, derived from the first five fractions of kV-CBCTs, to account for inter-fractional bladder changes. This recipe was validated using kV-CBCTs from fractions six to ten and the final five fractions. The goal was to achieve a residual volume, defined as the percentage of daily bladder volume (V<sub>daily</sub>) outside the PTV, of less than 5%. Adaptive and conventional plans were created using proposed and conventional margins, respectively. A dosimetric comparison of targets and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(V<sub>daily</sub>) decreased throughout the treatment course. The most notable inter-fractional bladder variations were in the superior and anterior directions. The patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margins, averaging 6 mm (± 2.9 mm), achieved a residual volume of less than 5%. Compared to conventional planning, the adaptive approach reduced PTV volume by an average of 135.3 cc (± 46.6 cc). A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was identified between residual volume and adaptive margins in the anterior, superior, left, and right directions. Using the proposed adaptive margins, the median residual volume was 0.71% (interquartile range 0.09%-3.55%), and the median (V<sub>daily</sub>) receiving the prescribed dose was 99.1% (interquartile range 95.3%-99.9%). Adaptive plans demonstrated superior OAR sparing compared to conventional plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation resulted in margins smaller than conventional ones, optimized normal tissue sparing, and maintained adequate PTV coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14617\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全膀胱照射是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的一种器官保存治疗方法。常规规划裕度,通常为15-20毫米,会增加正常组织毒性并限制可能的剂量增加。目的:本研究旨在为全膀胱照射开发一种患者特异性适应性切缘处方,以尽量减少计划靶体积(PTV),同时保持足够的剂量覆盖。方法:回顾性选择16例接受全膀胱放射治疗的患者。我们提出了一种患者特异性的各向异性适应性边缘配方,该配方来源于kv - cbct的前五个部分,以解释部分膀胱变化。该配方使用kv - cbct从分数六到十和最后五个分数进行验证。目标是达到小于5%的剩余容量,定义为每日膀胱体积(Vdaily)在PTV外的百分比。适应性规划和传统规划分别使用拟议的和传统的边界。在两种方法之间进行了靶和危险器官(OARs)的剂量学比较。结果:在整个治疗过程中Vdaily均有所下降。膀胱分段间最显著的变异在上、前两个方向。患者特异性各向异性自适应切缘平均为6mm(±2.9 mm),剩余体积小于5%。与传统规划相比,自适应方法平均减少了135.3 cc(±46.6 cc)的PTV体积。接受规定剂量的显著相关性(p每日)为99.1%(四分位数范围为95.3%-99.9%)。与传统方案相比,适应性方案显示出更好的桨叶节约。结论:所提出的患者特异性适应性全膀胱放射切缘处方使切缘比传统方法更小,优化了正常组织保留,并保持了足够的PTV覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-specific adaptive planning margin for whole bladder radiation therapy.

Background: Whole bladder irradiation is an organ preservation treatment approach for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Conventional planning margins, typically 15-20 mm, increase normal tissue toxicity and limit possible dose escalation.

Purpose: The study aimed to develop a patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation to minimize the planning target volume (PTV) while preserving adequate dose coverage.

Methods: Sixteen patients who received whole-bladder irradiation were retrospectively selected for this study. We proposed a patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margin recipe, derived from the first five fractions of kV-CBCTs, to account for inter-fractional bladder changes. This recipe was validated using kV-CBCTs from fractions six to ten and the final five fractions. The goal was to achieve a residual volume, defined as the percentage of daily bladder volume (Vdaily) outside the PTV, of less than 5%. Adaptive and conventional plans were created using proposed and conventional margins, respectively. A dosimetric comparison of targets and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed between the two approaches.

Results: (Vdaily) decreased throughout the treatment course. The most notable inter-fractional bladder variations were in the superior and anterior directions. The patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margins, averaging 6 mm (± 2.9 mm), achieved a residual volume of less than 5%. Compared to conventional planning, the adaptive approach reduced PTV volume by an average of 135.3 cc (± 46.6 cc). A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was identified between residual volume and adaptive margins in the anterior, superior, left, and right directions. Using the proposed adaptive margins, the median residual volume was 0.71% (interquartile range 0.09%-3.55%), and the median (Vdaily) receiving the prescribed dose was 99.1% (interquartile range 95.3%-99.9%). Adaptive plans demonstrated superior OAR sparing compared to conventional plans.

Conclusions: The proposed patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation resulted in margins smaller than conventional ones, optimized normal tissue sparing, and maintained adequate PTV coverage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信