医疗专业人员短缺地区的奖金支付和医疗保险下的医疗服务。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1002/hec.4924
Christopher S Brunt
{"title":"医疗专业人员短缺地区的奖金支付和医疗保险下的医疗服务。","authors":"Christopher S Brunt","doi":"10.1002/hec.4924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For over 3 decades, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has provided a bonus payment for outpatient physician services provided to beneficiaries under Medicare Part B in areas designated as Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) during the previous calendar year. Despite the longstanding existence of the program, no studies have explicitly evaluated how previously established physicians practicing in areas subject to an HPSA designation respond to the bonus payments. Using 2012-2019 physician-level data with stacked event study models that control for several characteristics, including the underlying criteria used to construct HPSA scores, I find little to no statistically significant changes in access to care (as measured through total annual beneficiaries treated or services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries) in the years leading up to HPSA designation. However, once physicians become eligible for a 10% bonus payment, their annual number of beneficiaries treated and volume of services decline, consistent with recent empirical work and CMS's actuarial assumptions about how physicians respond to changes in reimbursement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Professional Shortage Area Bonus Payments and Access to Care Under Medicare.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher S Brunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.4924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For over 3 decades, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has provided a bonus payment for outpatient physician services provided to beneficiaries under Medicare Part B in areas designated as Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) during the previous calendar year. Despite the longstanding existence of the program, no studies have explicitly evaluated how previously established physicians practicing in areas subject to an HPSA designation respond to the bonus payments. Using 2012-2019 physician-level data with stacked event study models that control for several characteristics, including the underlying criteria used to construct HPSA scores, I find little to no statistically significant changes in access to care (as measured through total annual beneficiaries treated or services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries) in the years leading up to HPSA designation. However, once physicians become eligible for a 10% bonus payment, their annual number of beneficiaries treated and volume of services decline, consistent with recent empirical work and CMS's actuarial assumptions about how physicians respond to changes in reimbursement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4924\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

30多年来,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)为医疗保险B部分受益人在指定为初级保健专业人员短缺地区(hpsa)的前一个日历年度提供门诊医生服务提供了奖金。尽管该项目长期存在,但没有研究明确评估在HPSA指定领域执业的医生对奖金的反应。使用2012-2019年医生级别的数据和堆叠事件研究模型,控制了几个特征,包括用于构建HPSA评分的基本标准,我发现在HPSA指定之前的几年里,获得医疗服务的机会(通过每年接受治疗的受益人总数或向医疗保险受益人提供的服务来衡量)几乎没有统计学上的显著变化。然而,一旦医生有资格获得10%的奖金,他们每年治疗的受益人人数和服务量就会下降,这与最近的实证研究和CMS关于医生如何应对报销变化的精算假设是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Professional Shortage Area Bonus Payments and Access to Care Under Medicare.

For over 3 decades, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has provided a bonus payment for outpatient physician services provided to beneficiaries under Medicare Part B in areas designated as Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) during the previous calendar year. Despite the longstanding existence of the program, no studies have explicitly evaluated how previously established physicians practicing in areas subject to an HPSA designation respond to the bonus payments. Using 2012-2019 physician-level data with stacked event study models that control for several characteristics, including the underlying criteria used to construct HPSA scores, I find little to no statistically significant changes in access to care (as measured through total annual beneficiaries treated or services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries) in the years leading up to HPSA designation. However, once physicians become eligible for a 10% bonus payment, their annual number of beneficiaries treated and volume of services decline, consistent with recent empirical work and CMS's actuarial assumptions about how physicians respond to changes in reimbursement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信