美托洛尔不良事件和文献分析:使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)进行病例/非病例分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yikuan Du, Mengting Zhang, Ziyi Luo, Zhonghan Liang, Weijian Liang, Zhixing Chen, Ruiyun Fan, Yin Huang, Jiaqi Li, Mianda Hu, Jiahui Li, Jinfeng Zhu, Weichui Zhang, Yi Liu, Chun Yang
{"title":"美托洛尔不良事件和文献分析:使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)进行病例/非病例分析。","authors":"Yikuan Du, Mengting Zhang, Ziyi Luo, Zhonghan Liang, Weijian Liang, Zhixing Chen, Ruiyun Fan, Yin Huang, Jiaqi Li, Mianda Hu, Jiahui Li, Jinfeng Zhu, Weichui Zhang, Yi Liu, Chun Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2446420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, β-blockers such as metoprolol have been upgraded to first-line antihypertensive drugs. However, metoprolol demonstrates poor prognosis effects on diseases such as stroke. Further clinical application may expand the possibility of its related adverse reactions. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the overall safety of metoprolol.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Statistical analysis and signal mining were conducted on adverse event reports related to metoprolol obtained from the FAERS database. Signal mining was conducted using the proportional reporting ratio, the report margin method, the bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean in the measures of disproportionality to detect potential adverse reaction signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed 16,853 reports related to metoprolol use, identifying 506 preferred terms (PTs) covering 23 system organ classes (SOCs). In addition, some new potential adverse reactions appeared among the top 30 PTs ranked by signal strength, such as 'orthostatic intolerance' (IC025 = 3.00), 'trigemino-cardiac reflex' (IC025 = 4.30), 'decorticate posture' (IC025 = 3.34), etc. Notably, there was a strong association between 'suspected suicide' (IC025 = 5.59) and the drug signal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified unexpected signals of serious adverse reactions, suggesting the importance of continuous post-marketing surveillance of metoprolol to understand its potential risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metoprolol adverse events and literature analyses: case/non-case analyses using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).\",\"authors\":\"Yikuan Du, Mengting Zhang, Ziyi Luo, Zhonghan Liang, Weijian Liang, Zhixing Chen, Ruiyun Fan, Yin Huang, Jiaqi Li, Mianda Hu, Jiahui Li, Jinfeng Zhu, Weichui Zhang, Yi Liu, Chun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2446420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, β-blockers such as metoprolol have been upgraded to first-line antihypertensive drugs. However, metoprolol demonstrates poor prognosis effects on diseases such as stroke. Further clinical application may expand the possibility of its related adverse reactions. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the overall safety of metoprolol.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Statistical analysis and signal mining were conducted on adverse event reports related to metoprolol obtained from the FAERS database. Signal mining was conducted using the proportional reporting ratio, the report margin method, the bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean in the measures of disproportionality to detect potential adverse reaction signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed 16,853 reports related to metoprolol use, identifying 506 preferred terms (PTs) covering 23 system organ classes (SOCs). In addition, some new potential adverse reactions appeared among the top 30 PTs ranked by signal strength, such as 'orthostatic intolerance' (IC025 = 3.00), 'trigemino-cardiac reflex' (IC025 = 4.30), 'decorticate posture' (IC025 = 3.34), etc. Notably, there was a strong association between 'suspected suicide' (IC025 = 5.59) and the drug signal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified unexpected signals of serious adverse reactions, suggesting the importance of continuous post-marketing surveillance of metoprolol to understand its potential risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2446420\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2446420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,美托洛尔等β受体阻滞剂已升级为一线降压药物。然而,美托洛尔对中风等疾病的预后效果较差。进一步的临床应用可能会扩大其相关不良反应发生的可能性。目前对美托洛尔的整体安全性缺乏全面的研究。研究设计与方法:对FAERS数据库中获取的美托洛尔相关不良事件报告进行统计分析和信号挖掘。利用比例报告比、报告边际法、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络和经验贝叶斯几何均值在歧化度量中进行信号挖掘,检测潜在的不良反应信号。结果:结果显示与美托洛尔使用相关的16,853份报告,确定506个首选术语(PTs),涵盖23个系统器官类别(soc)。此外,在信号强度排名前30位的PTs中,出现了一些新的潜在不良反应,如“直立性不耐受”(IC025 = 3.00)、“三叉神经-心脏反射”(IC025 = 4.30)、“去皮质姿势”(IC025 = 3.34)等。值得注意的是,“疑似自杀”(IC025 = 5.59)与药物信号之间存在很强的关联。结论:本研究发现了严重不良反应的意外信号,提示对美托洛尔进行持续的上市后监测以了解其潜在风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metoprolol adverse events and literature analyses: case/non-case analyses using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Background: In recent years, β-blockers such as metoprolol have been upgraded to first-line antihypertensive drugs. However, metoprolol demonstrates poor prognosis effects on diseases such as stroke. Further clinical application may expand the possibility of its related adverse reactions. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the overall safety of metoprolol.

Research design and methods: Statistical analysis and signal mining were conducted on adverse event reports related to metoprolol obtained from the FAERS database. Signal mining was conducted using the proportional reporting ratio, the report margin method, the bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean in the measures of disproportionality to detect potential adverse reaction signals.

Results: The results showed 16,853 reports related to metoprolol use, identifying 506 preferred terms (PTs) covering 23 system organ classes (SOCs). In addition, some new potential adverse reactions appeared among the top 30 PTs ranked by signal strength, such as 'orthostatic intolerance' (IC025 = 3.00), 'trigemino-cardiac reflex' (IC025 = 4.30), 'decorticate posture' (IC025 = 3.34), etc. Notably, there was a strong association between 'suspected suicide' (IC025 = 5.59) and the drug signal.

Conclusions: This study identified unexpected signals of serious adverse reactions, suggesting the importance of continuous post-marketing surveillance of metoprolol to understand its potential risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信