将农田单一栽培转变为农林业增加了甲烷的吸收

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Guodong Shao, Guntars O. Martinson, Marife D. Corre, Jie Luo, Dan Niu, Edzo Veldkamp
{"title":"将农田单一栽培转变为农林业增加了甲烷的吸收","authors":"Guodong Shao,&nbsp;Guntars O. Martinson,&nbsp;Marife D. Corre,&nbsp;Jie Luo,&nbsp;Dan Niu,&nbsp;Edzo Veldkamp","doi":"10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In temperate Europe, agroforestry practice is gaining interest due to its potential to enhance carbon (C) sequestration and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. To date, the effects of agroforestry on the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) fluxes are still poorly quantified. Here we present a systematic comparison of soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes between agroforestry and monoculture cropland systems for the first time, based on two-year field measurements at three sites on different soils in Germany. Each site had an adjacent alley cropping agroforestry system and monoculture, and the agroforestry was established on former monoculture croplands 1 to 11 years prior to this study. We found that area-weighted soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from agroforestry (3.5−8.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) were comparable to monocultures (3.4−9.8 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), whereas area-weighted agroforestry generally had higher soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake (0.4−1.3 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) compared to monocultures (0.1−1.2 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). Seasonal variations of soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were strongly regulated by soil temperature and moisture, and the spatial variations were influenced by soil texture. Our results suggest that conversion of monoculture cropland to long-term alley cropping agroforestry system could be considered as a sustainable agriculture practice for its great potential for mitigating CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversion of cropland monoculture to agroforestry increases methane uptake\",\"authors\":\"Guodong Shao,&nbsp;Guntars O. Martinson,&nbsp;Marife D. Corre,&nbsp;Jie Luo,&nbsp;Dan Niu,&nbsp;Edzo Veldkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In temperate Europe, agroforestry practice is gaining interest due to its potential to enhance carbon (C) sequestration and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. To date, the effects of agroforestry on the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) fluxes are still poorly quantified. Here we present a systematic comparison of soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes between agroforestry and monoculture cropland systems for the first time, based on two-year field measurements at three sites on different soils in Germany. Each site had an adjacent alley cropping agroforestry system and monoculture, and the agroforestry was established on former monoculture croplands 1 to 11 years prior to this study. We found that area-weighted soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from agroforestry (3.5−8.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) were comparable to monocultures (3.4−9.8 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), whereas area-weighted agroforestry generally had higher soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake (0.4−1.3 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) compared to monocultures (0.1−1.2 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). Seasonal variations of soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were strongly regulated by soil temperature and moisture, and the spatial variations were influenced by soil texture. Our results suggest that conversion of monoculture cropland to long-term alley cropping agroforestry system could be considered as a sustainable agriculture practice for its great potential for mitigating CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在温带的欧洲,农林业实践因其在加强碳(C)固存和减少农业温室气体(GHG)排放方面的潜力而日益受到关注。迄今为止,农林业对土壤二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)通量时空动态的影响仍然缺乏量化。在这里,我们首次系统地比较了农林业和单一农田系统之间的土壤CO2和CH4通量,基于在德国不同土壤的三个地点进行的为期两年的实地测量。每个站点都有相邻的小巷种植农林业系统和单作,而农林业是在本研究前1至11年以前的单作农田上建立的。我们发现,农林业的面积加权土壤二氧化碳排放量(3.5 - 8.1 Mg C / ha−1年−1)与单一栽培(3.4 - 9.8 Mg C / ha−1年−1)相当,而面积加权农林业的土壤CH4吸收量(0.4 - 1.3 kg C / ha−1年−1)通常高于单一栽培(0.1 - 1.2 kg C / ha−1年−1)。土壤CO2和CH4通量的季节变化受土壤温度和湿度的强烈调节,空间变化受土壤质地的影响。我们的研究结果表明,将单作农田转变为长期巷作农林复合系统可以被认为是一种可持续的农业实践,因为它具有减少CH4排放的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversion of cropland monoculture to agroforestry increases methane uptake

In temperate Europe, agroforestry practice is gaining interest due to its potential to enhance carbon (C) sequestration and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. To date, the effects of agroforestry on the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes are still poorly quantified. Here we present a systematic comparison of soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes between agroforestry and monoculture cropland systems for the first time, based on two-year field measurements at three sites on different soils in Germany. Each site had an adjacent alley cropping agroforestry system and monoculture, and the agroforestry was established on former monoculture croplands 1 to 11 years prior to this study. We found that area-weighted soil CO2 emissions from agroforestry (3.5−8.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) were comparable to monocultures (3.4−9.8 Mg C ha−1 yr−1), whereas area-weighted agroforestry generally had higher soil CH4 uptake (0.4−1.3 kg C ha−1 yr−1) compared to monocultures (0.1−1.2 kg C ha−1 yr−1). Seasonal variations of soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes were strongly regulated by soil temperature and moisture, and the spatial variations were influenced by soil texture. Our results suggest that conversion of monoculture cropland to long-term alley cropping agroforestry system could be considered as a sustainable agriculture practice for its great potential for mitigating CH4 emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信