利用MRI分析和机器学习算法早期诊断阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍。

Discover applied sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w
Helia Givian, Jean-Paul Calbimonte
{"title":"利用MRI分析和机器学习算法早期诊断阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍。","authors":"Helia Givian, Jean-Paul Calbimonte","doi":"10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial to prevent their progression. In this study, we proposed the analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on features including; hippocampus (HC) area size, HC grayscale statistics and texture features (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, contrast, correlation, energy, homogeneity, entropy), lateral ventricle (LV) area size, gray matter area size, white matter area size, cerebrospinal fluid area size, patient age, weight, and cognitive score. Five machine learning classifiers; K-nearest neighborhood (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and multi-layer perception (MLP) were used to distinguish between groups: cognitively normal (CN) vs AD, early MCI (EMCI) vs late MCI (LMCI), CN vs EMCI, CN vs LMCI, AD vs EMCI, and AD vs LMCI. Additionally, the correlation and dependence were calculated to examine the strength and direction of association between each extracted feature and each classification of the group. The average classification accuracies in 20 trials were 95% (SVM), 71.50% (RF), 82.58% (RF), 84.91% (SVM), 85.83% (RF), and 85.08% (RF), respectively, with the best accuracies being 100% (SVM, RF, and MLP), 83.33% (RF), 91.66% (RF), 95% (SVM, and MLP), 96.66% (RF), and 93.33% (DT). Cognitive scores, HC and LV area sizes, and HC texture features demonstrated significant potential for diagnosing AD and its subtypes for all groups. RF and SVM showed better performance in distinguishing between groups. These findings highlight the importance of using 2D-MRI to identify key features containing critical information for early diagnosis of AD.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":520292,"journal":{"name":"Discover applied sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using MRI analysis and machine learning algorithms.\",\"authors\":\"Helia Givian, Jean-Paul Calbimonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial to prevent their progression. In this study, we proposed the analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on features including; hippocampus (HC) area size, HC grayscale statistics and texture features (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, contrast, correlation, energy, homogeneity, entropy), lateral ventricle (LV) area size, gray matter area size, white matter area size, cerebrospinal fluid area size, patient age, weight, and cognitive score. Five machine learning classifiers; K-nearest neighborhood (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and multi-layer perception (MLP) were used to distinguish between groups: cognitively normal (CN) vs AD, early MCI (EMCI) vs late MCI (LMCI), CN vs EMCI, CN vs LMCI, AD vs EMCI, and AD vs LMCI. Additionally, the correlation and dependence were calculated to examine the strength and direction of association between each extracted feature and each classification of the group. The average classification accuracies in 20 trials were 95% (SVM), 71.50% (RF), 82.58% (RF), 84.91% (SVM), 85.83% (RF), and 85.08% (RF), respectively, with the best accuracies being 100% (SVM, RF, and MLP), 83.33% (RF), 91.66% (RF), 95% (SVM, and MLP), 96.66% (RF), and 93.33% (DT). Cognitive scores, HC and LV area sizes, and HC texture features demonstrated significant potential for diagnosing AD and its subtypes for all groups. RF and SVM showed better performance in distinguishing between groups. These findings highlight the importance of using 2D-MRI to identify key features containing critical information for early diagnosis of AD.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discover applied sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655575/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discover applied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover applied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)是至关重要的,以防止其进展。在本研究中,我们提出了基于以下特征的磁共振成像(MRI)分析;海马(HC)面积大小、HC灰度统计和纹理特征(均值、标准差、偏度、峰度、对比度、相关性、能量、均匀性、熵)、侧脑室(LV)面积大小、灰质面积大小、白质面积大小、脑脊液面积大小、患者年龄、体重和认知评分。五种机器学习分类器;使用k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)和多层感知(MLP)来区分组:认知正常(CN)与AD、早期MCI (EMCI)与晚期MCI (LMCI)、CN与EMCI、CN与LMCI、AD与EMCI、AD与LMCI。此外,计算相关性和依赖性,以检查每个提取的特征与组的每个分类之间的关联强度和方向。20个试验的平均分类准确率分别为95% (SVM)、71.50% (RF)、82.58% (RF)、84.91% (SVM)、85.83% (RF)和85.08% (RF),其中最佳准确率为100% (SVM、RF和MLP)、83.33% (RF)、91.66% (RF)、95% (SVM和MLP)、96.66% (RF)和93.33% (DT)。认知评分、HC和LV面积大小以及HC纹理特征在所有组中都显示出诊断AD及其亚型的显著潜力。RF和SVM在组间区分方面表现出较好的性能。这些发现强调了使用2D-MRI识别包含早期AD诊断关键信息的关键特征的重要性。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using MRI analysis and machine learning algorithms.

Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial to prevent their progression. In this study, we proposed the analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on features including; hippocampus (HC) area size, HC grayscale statistics and texture features (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, contrast, correlation, energy, homogeneity, entropy), lateral ventricle (LV) area size, gray matter area size, white matter area size, cerebrospinal fluid area size, patient age, weight, and cognitive score. Five machine learning classifiers; K-nearest neighborhood (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and multi-layer perception (MLP) were used to distinguish between groups: cognitively normal (CN) vs AD, early MCI (EMCI) vs late MCI (LMCI), CN vs EMCI, CN vs LMCI, AD vs EMCI, and AD vs LMCI. Additionally, the correlation and dependence were calculated to examine the strength and direction of association between each extracted feature and each classification of the group. The average classification accuracies in 20 trials were 95% (SVM), 71.50% (RF), 82.58% (RF), 84.91% (SVM), 85.83% (RF), and 85.08% (RF), respectively, with the best accuracies being 100% (SVM, RF, and MLP), 83.33% (RF), 91.66% (RF), 95% (SVM, and MLP), 96.66% (RF), and 93.33% (DT). Cognitive scores, HC and LV area sizes, and HC texture features demonstrated significant potential for diagnosing AD and its subtypes for all groups. RF and SVM showed better performance in distinguishing between groups. These findings highlight the importance of using 2D-MRI to identify key features containing critical information for early diagnosis of AD.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信