初步证据表明,自我激励独特地促进了被监禁人群的戒烟:一项随机对照试验。

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Emma M. Brown , Debbie M. Smith , Christopher J. Armitage
{"title":"初步证据表明,自我激励独特地促进了被监禁人群的戒烟:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Emma M. Brown ,&nbsp;Debbie M. Smith ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Armitage","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Smoking prevalence rates in prison are typically four times higher than the rates found within community-based settings, increasing premature mortality. Encouraging smokers to self-administer incentives contingent on abstinence (i.e., self-incentivize) are effective in community-based settings and have the potential to work in an incarcerated population. The present study aims to: gauge the feasibility of- and assess possible effects associated with- encouraging smokers to self-incentivize to increase smoking abstinence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study recruited 25 smokers from a UK prison who were attending the prison-based stop smoking service. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions, either: (a) an active control, asked to form a plan to quit smoking (<em>n</em>=5); or to self-incentivize if they had not smoked at all by the end of (b) the week (<em>n</em>=7); or (c) the month (<em>n</em>=13). The study gave no specific options to participants in choosing a self-incentive for a number of reasons (e.g., to enable choice of a self-incentive of sufficient rewarding value within a restrictive setting). Participant eligibility included: (a) aged 18 years or over, (b) able to understand written English, (c) competent to provide informed consent, and (d) were tobacco smokers, smoking on a daily basis. Acceptance and completion assessed feasibility. Chi-square analysis assessed possible effect of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty five out of 27 smokers who were approached, welcomed the opportunity of further support and completed the baseline questionnaire. At 3-month follow-up, no participants (0/5) in the control condition abstained from smoking. In contrast, three (out of seven, d=1.12) participants who self-incentivized on a weekly basis abstained, and five (out of 13, d=0.83) participants who self-incentivized on a monthly basis abstained at the 3-month follow-up time point. Abstaining is defined as no cigarette smoked within at least the last 28-days via self-report and supported by biochemical verification from a sub-sample of participants (68%; 17/25).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of self-incentives alongside behavioral support and cessation medication is feasible and can be delivered at low-cost. Furthermore, the promise seen in this trial suggests a fully powered randomized controlled trial has the potential to increase smoking abstinence in an incarcerated population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 209610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary evidence that self-incentives uniquely promote smoking cessation in incarcerated populations: A pilot randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Emma M. Brown ,&nbsp;Debbie M. Smith ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Armitage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Smoking prevalence rates in prison are typically four times higher than the rates found within community-based settings, increasing premature mortality. Encouraging smokers to self-administer incentives contingent on abstinence (i.e., self-incentivize) are effective in community-based settings and have the potential to work in an incarcerated population. The present study aims to: gauge the feasibility of- and assess possible effects associated with- encouraging smokers to self-incentivize to increase smoking abstinence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study recruited 25 smokers from a UK prison who were attending the prison-based stop smoking service. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions, either: (a) an active control, asked to form a plan to quit smoking (<em>n</em>=5); or to self-incentivize if they had not smoked at all by the end of (b) the week (<em>n</em>=7); or (c) the month (<em>n</em>=13). The study gave no specific options to participants in choosing a self-incentive for a number of reasons (e.g., to enable choice of a self-incentive of sufficient rewarding value within a restrictive setting). Participant eligibility included: (a) aged 18 years or over, (b) able to understand written English, (c) competent to provide informed consent, and (d) were tobacco smokers, smoking on a daily basis. Acceptance and completion assessed feasibility. Chi-square analysis assessed possible effect of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty five out of 27 smokers who were approached, welcomed the opportunity of further support and completed the baseline questionnaire. At 3-month follow-up, no participants (0/5) in the control condition abstained from smoking. In contrast, three (out of seven, d=1.12) participants who self-incentivized on a weekly basis abstained, and five (out of 13, d=0.83) participants who self-incentivized on a monthly basis abstained at the 3-month follow-up time point. Abstaining is defined as no cigarette smoked within at least the last 28-days via self-report and supported by biochemical verification from a sub-sample of participants (68%; 17/25).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of self-incentives alongside behavioral support and cessation medication is feasible and can be delivered at low-cost. Furthermore, the promise seen in this trial suggests a fully powered randomized controlled trial has the potential to increase smoking abstinence in an incarcerated population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924003229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924003229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:监狱中的吸烟率通常比社区环境中的吸烟率高出四倍,增加了过早死亡率。鼓励吸烟者自我实施基于戒烟的激励措施(即自我激励)在社区环境中是有效的,并有可能在监禁人群中发挥作用。本研究旨在评估鼓励吸烟者自我激励增加戒烟的可行性,并评估其可能产生的影响。方法:研究从英国监狱招募了25名参加监狱戒烟服务的吸烟者。参与者被随机分配到三种情况中的一种,:(a)主动控制,被要求制定戒烟计划(n = 5);或者,如果他们在(b)周结束时完全没有吸烟,就自我激励(n = 7);或(c)月份(n = 13)。由于一些原因(例如,为了在限制性设置中选择具有足够奖励价值的自我激励),该研究没有给参与者选择自我激励的具体选项。参与者的资格包括:(a)年龄在18岁 或以上,(b)能够理解书面英语,(c)有能力提供知情同意,以及(d)是吸烟者,每天吸烟。验收和竣工评估可行性。卡方分析评估了干预的可能效果。结果:27名吸烟者中有25人接受了进一步的支持,并完成了基线问卷。随访3个月,对照组无戒烟者(0/5)。相比之下,每周自我激励的参与者中有3人(7人中d = 1.12)弃权,每月自我激励的参与者中有5人(d = 0.83)在3个月的随访时间点弃权。戒烟被定义为至少在过去28天内没有吸烟,通过自我报告,并得到参与者子样本的生化验证(68% %;17/25)。结论:使用自我激励与行为支持和戒烟药物是可行的,并且可以以低成本提供。此外,在这项试验中看到的希望表明,一项完全有力的随机对照试验有可能增加监禁人群的戒烟率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary evidence that self-incentives uniquely promote smoking cessation in incarcerated populations: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Smoking prevalence rates in prison are typically four times higher than the rates found within community-based settings, increasing premature mortality. Encouraging smokers to self-administer incentives contingent on abstinence (i.e., self-incentivize) are effective in community-based settings and have the potential to work in an incarcerated population. The present study aims to: gauge the feasibility of- and assess possible effects associated with- encouraging smokers to self-incentivize to increase smoking abstinence.

Methods

The study recruited 25 smokers from a UK prison who were attending the prison-based stop smoking service. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions, either: (a) an active control, asked to form a plan to quit smoking (n=5); or to self-incentivize if they had not smoked at all by the end of (b) the week (n=7); or (c) the month (n=13). The study gave no specific options to participants in choosing a self-incentive for a number of reasons (e.g., to enable choice of a self-incentive of sufficient rewarding value within a restrictive setting). Participant eligibility included: (a) aged 18 years or over, (b) able to understand written English, (c) competent to provide informed consent, and (d) were tobacco smokers, smoking on a daily basis. Acceptance and completion assessed feasibility. Chi-square analysis assessed possible effect of the intervention.

Results

Twenty five out of 27 smokers who were approached, welcomed the opportunity of further support and completed the baseline questionnaire. At 3-month follow-up, no participants (0/5) in the control condition abstained from smoking. In contrast, three (out of seven, d=1.12) participants who self-incentivized on a weekly basis abstained, and five (out of 13, d=0.83) participants who self-incentivized on a monthly basis abstained at the 3-month follow-up time point. Abstaining is defined as no cigarette smoked within at least the last 28-days via self-report and supported by biochemical verification from a sub-sample of participants (68%; 17/25).

Conclusions

Use of self-incentives alongside behavioral support and cessation medication is feasible and can be delivered at low-cost. Furthermore, the promise seen in this trial suggests a fully powered randomized controlled trial has the potential to increase smoking abstinence in an incarcerated population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信