股骨近端骨折置换术后下肢长度差异是什么?一项590髋的前瞻性多中心观察性研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Fredson Razanabola, Henri-Antoine Peuchot, Roger Erivan, Xavier Flecher, Marie Pierret, Hervé Nieto, Christophe Chantelot, Mehdi Hormi-Menard, Benoît Villain, Pierre Martz, François Loubignac, Olivier Gastaud, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Anthony Viste, Philippe Boisrenoult, Erwan Pansard, Pierre Klein, Romain Rey, Alain Duhamel, Henri Migaud
{"title":"股骨近端骨折置换术后下肢长度差异是什么?一项590髋的前瞻性多中心观察性研究。","authors":"Fredson Razanabola, Henri-Antoine Peuchot, Roger Erivan, Xavier Flecher, Marie Pierret, Hervé Nieto, Christophe Chantelot, Mehdi Hormi-Menard, Benoît Villain, Pierre Martz, François Loubignac, Olivier Gastaud, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Anthony Viste, Philippe Boisrenoult, Erwan Pansard, Pierre Klein, Romain Rey, Alain Duhamel, Henri Migaud","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) following hip arthroplasty after proximal femoral fracture (PFFA) is little studied. The aim of this work was to answer the following questions: 1) What are the incidence and mean values ​​of LLD after PFFA? 2) What are the clinical consequences (tolerance) of LLD after PFFA? 3) Can we identify risk factors for LLD after PFFA? 4) Is there a significant difference in terms of LLD after PFFA to treat intra- versus extra-capsular fractures?</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>LLD after proximal femoral fracture arthroplasty is rare but has good clinical tolerance, given the low functional demands of the patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study (15 centers), including 590 patients, operated on for hip arthroplasty for proximal femur fracture between May 2022 and June 2023. The mean age was 81.74 years (±10.72). The clinical and radiological measurement of LLD was carried out between the 6th week and the 6th month postoperatively. A positive LLD meant that the operated side was lengthened, a negative LLD meant that it was shortened. Clinical tolerance was measured using objective (Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Harris (HHS)) and subjective (Oxford-12 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) functional scores as well as autonomy measured using the Parker score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and radiological measurements of LLD were highly correlated (p < 0.001), and showed an overall shortening trend of -0.03 mm (±4.99). In total, 265/590 patients (45%) had a LLD greater than 3 mm, 131/590 (22%) had an LLD greater than 5 mm, and 24/590 (4%) had a LLD greater than 10 mm. A LLD beyond ±3 mm significantly worsened all functional scores compared to an LLD below this threshold (PMA: 12.2 ± 3.2 vs. 12.9 ± 3.6 (p = 0.020); HHS: 62.7 ± 20.3 vs. 66.5 ± 19.3 (p = 0.027); FJS: 61.5 ± 28.8 vs. 72.5 ± 25.6 (p < 0.001); and the Oxford-12 score: 29.2 ± 9.7 vs. 26 ± 9.4 (p < 0.001)). However, no significant difference was observed for the autonomy (Parker score 4.7 ± 2.5 versus 4.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.58)). Female gender (+0.43 mm ± 4.71 (p < 0.001)) and cementing of the femoral implant (+0.42 mm ± 4.57 (p = 0.014)) were associated to lengthening. Cementless stems (-0.41 mm ± 5.29 (p = 0.014)), general anesthesia without curare (-1.8 mm ± 5.96 (p = 0.007)), and the Röttinger and Watson-Jones approaches (-1.34 mm ± 4.57 (p = 0.04)) were associated to shortening. There was no difference between LLD after intracapsular fracture (-0.06 mm ± 5) and extracapsular fracture (+0.9 mm ± 3 (p = 0.45)).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results are consistent with the literature data which is sparse on the subject, with 78% of LLD in our series ranging between +5 and -5 mm. Functional consequences were observed as soon as the 3 mm threshold was exceeded but without effect on autonomy. Only 4% of patients had a centimeter inequality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; prospective study without control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the lower limb length discrepancy after arthroplasty for proximal femoral fracture? A prospective, multicenter observational study of 590 hips.\",\"authors\":\"Fredson Razanabola, Henri-Antoine Peuchot, Roger Erivan, Xavier Flecher, Marie Pierret, Hervé Nieto, Christophe Chantelot, Mehdi Hormi-Menard, Benoît Villain, Pierre Martz, François Loubignac, Olivier Gastaud, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Anthony Viste, Philippe Boisrenoult, Erwan Pansard, Pierre Klein, Romain Rey, Alain Duhamel, Henri Migaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) following hip arthroplasty after proximal femoral fracture (PFFA) is little studied. The aim of this work was to answer the following questions: 1) What are the incidence and mean values ​​of LLD after PFFA? 2) What are the clinical consequences (tolerance) of LLD after PFFA? 3) Can we identify risk factors for LLD after PFFA? 4) Is there a significant difference in terms of LLD after PFFA to treat intra- versus extra-capsular fractures?</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>LLD after proximal femoral fracture arthroplasty is rare but has good clinical tolerance, given the low functional demands of the patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study (15 centers), including 590 patients, operated on for hip arthroplasty for proximal femur fracture between May 2022 and June 2023. The mean age was 81.74 years (±10.72). The clinical and radiological measurement of LLD was carried out between the 6th week and the 6th month postoperatively. A positive LLD meant that the operated side was lengthened, a negative LLD meant that it was shortened. Clinical tolerance was measured using objective (Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Harris (HHS)) and subjective (Oxford-12 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) functional scores as well as autonomy measured using the Parker score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and radiological measurements of LLD were highly correlated (p < 0.001), and showed an overall shortening trend of -0.03 mm (±4.99). In total, 265/590 patients (45%) had a LLD greater than 3 mm, 131/590 (22%) had an LLD greater than 5 mm, and 24/590 (4%) had a LLD greater than 10 mm. A LLD beyond ±3 mm significantly worsened all functional scores compared to an LLD below this threshold (PMA: 12.2 ± 3.2 vs. 12.9 ± 3.6 (p = 0.020); HHS: 62.7 ± 20.3 vs. 66.5 ± 19.3 (p = 0.027); FJS: 61.5 ± 28.8 vs. 72.5 ± 25.6 (p < 0.001); and the Oxford-12 score: 29.2 ± 9.7 vs. 26 ± 9.4 (p < 0.001)). However, no significant difference was observed for the autonomy (Parker score 4.7 ± 2.5 versus 4.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.58)). Female gender (+0.43 mm ± 4.71 (p < 0.001)) and cementing of the femoral implant (+0.42 mm ± 4.57 (p = 0.014)) were associated to lengthening. Cementless stems (-0.41 mm ± 5.29 (p = 0.014)), general anesthesia without curare (-1.8 mm ± 5.96 (p = 0.007)), and the Röttinger and Watson-Jones approaches (-1.34 mm ± 4.57 (p = 0.04)) were associated to shortening. There was no difference between LLD after intracapsular fracture (-0.06 mm ± 5) and extracapsular fracture (+0.9 mm ± 3 (p = 0.45)).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results are consistent with the literature data which is sparse on the subject, with 78% of LLD in our series ranging between +5 and -5 mm. Functional consequences were observed as soon as the 3 mm threshold was exceeded but without effect on autonomy. Only 4% of patients had a centimeter inequality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; prospective study without control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:股骨近端骨折(PFFA)后髋关节置换术后下肢长度差异(LLD)的研究很少。本研究的目的是回答以下问题:1)PFFA后LLD的发生率和平均值是什么?2) PFFA后LLD的临床后果(耐受性)是什么?3)我们能否确定PFFA后LLD的危险因素?4) PFFA治疗囊内骨折与囊外骨折后LLD是否有显著差异?假设:股骨近端骨折置换术后LLD罕见,但鉴于患者功能需求低,临床耐受性良好。患者和方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究(15个中心),包括590名患者,于2022年5月至2023年6月期间接受了股骨近端骨折髋关节置换术。平均年龄81.74岁(±10.72岁)。术后6周至6个月进行LLD的临床和放射学测量。正LLD表示手术侧变长,负LLD表示手术侧变短。临床耐受性采用客观(Merle d' aubign (PMA)和Harris (HHS))和主观(Oxford-12和Forgotten Joint Score (FJS))功能评分来衡量,自主性采用Parker评分来衡量。结果:LLD的临床和放射测量高度相关(p讨论:我们的结果与文献数据一致,文献数据较少,在我们的研究中,78%的LLD的范围在+5到-5毫米之间。一旦超过3毫米阈值,就会观察到功能后果,但对自主性没有影响。只有4%的患者有厘米不等。证据等级:四级;前瞻性研究,无对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the lower limb length discrepancy after arthroplasty for proximal femoral fracture? A prospective, multicenter observational study of 590 hips.

Introduction: Lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) following hip arthroplasty after proximal femoral fracture (PFFA) is little studied. The aim of this work was to answer the following questions: 1) What are the incidence and mean values ​​of LLD after PFFA? 2) What are the clinical consequences (tolerance) of LLD after PFFA? 3) Can we identify risk factors for LLD after PFFA? 4) Is there a significant difference in terms of LLD after PFFA to treat intra- versus extra-capsular fractures?

Hypothesis: LLD after proximal femoral fracture arthroplasty is rare but has good clinical tolerance, given the low functional demands of the patients.

Patients and methods: This is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study (15 centers), including 590 patients, operated on for hip arthroplasty for proximal femur fracture between May 2022 and June 2023. The mean age was 81.74 years (±10.72). The clinical and radiological measurement of LLD was carried out between the 6th week and the 6th month postoperatively. A positive LLD meant that the operated side was lengthened, a negative LLD meant that it was shortened. Clinical tolerance was measured using objective (Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Harris (HHS)) and subjective (Oxford-12 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) functional scores as well as autonomy measured using the Parker score.

Results: Clinical and radiological measurements of LLD were highly correlated (p < 0.001), and showed an overall shortening trend of -0.03 mm (±4.99). In total, 265/590 patients (45%) had a LLD greater than 3 mm, 131/590 (22%) had an LLD greater than 5 mm, and 24/590 (4%) had a LLD greater than 10 mm. A LLD beyond ±3 mm significantly worsened all functional scores compared to an LLD below this threshold (PMA: 12.2 ± 3.2 vs. 12.9 ± 3.6 (p = 0.020); HHS: 62.7 ± 20.3 vs. 66.5 ± 19.3 (p = 0.027); FJS: 61.5 ± 28.8 vs. 72.5 ± 25.6 (p < 0.001); and the Oxford-12 score: 29.2 ± 9.7 vs. 26 ± 9.4 (p < 0.001)). However, no significant difference was observed for the autonomy (Parker score 4.7 ± 2.5 versus 4.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.58)). Female gender (+0.43 mm ± 4.71 (p < 0.001)) and cementing of the femoral implant (+0.42 mm ± 4.57 (p = 0.014)) were associated to lengthening. Cementless stems (-0.41 mm ± 5.29 (p = 0.014)), general anesthesia without curare (-1.8 mm ± 5.96 (p = 0.007)), and the Röttinger and Watson-Jones approaches (-1.34 mm ± 4.57 (p = 0.04)) were associated to shortening. There was no difference between LLD after intracapsular fracture (-0.06 mm ± 5) and extracapsular fracture (+0.9 mm ± 3 (p = 0.45)).

Discussion: Our results are consistent with the literature data which is sparse on the subject, with 78% of LLD in our series ranging between +5 and -5 mm. Functional consequences were observed as soon as the 3 mm threshold was exceeded but without effect on autonomy. Only 4% of patients had a centimeter inequality.

Level of evidence: IV; prospective study without control group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信