以康复为导向的实践在普通急诊科照顾精神疾病患者的关键方面:一项修正德尔菲研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17631
Katharina Derblom, Karuna Dahlberg, Sebastian Gabrielsson, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Jenny Molin
{"title":"以康复为导向的实践在普通急诊科照顾精神疾病患者的关键方面:一项修正德尔菲研究。","authors":"Katharina Derblom, Karuna Dahlberg, Sebastian Gabrielsson, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Jenny Molin","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in caring for people with mental ill-health in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi study with three rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 24-member expert panel was recruited consisting of people with lived experience of mental ill-health, registered nurses working in emergency care, registered nurses specialised in psychiatric and mental health nursing and mental health recovery researchers. In the initial round, important aspects of recovery-oriented practice were identified through focus group interviews. Thematic analysis generated statements that were then reformulated as a questionnaire for subsequent rounds. The experts rated each statement's perceived importance on a 5-point Likert scale. The consensus level was set at ≥ 80%. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on the importance of 39 of 73 statements, with ≥ 80% deemed 'very important' in recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises the delicate balance between the essential elements of recovery-oriented practice, their practical feasibility and the predominant biomedical perspective in general emergency department care. It proposes strategies to empower nursing staff and managers to adopt recovery-oriented practices that enhance the quality of care for people with mental ill-health. Enabling staff by providing the necessary prerequisites and a care environment that supports reflective practices is crucial. The responsibility for facilitating these changes needs to be a shared commitment between nursing staff and managers.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The identified issues can serve as a framework for interventions, education and training to support the integration of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency care. They can also be used to develop tools for evaluating emergency care environments and promoting alignment with recovery-oriented principles.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Problem addressed: People with mental ill-health are at risk of being neglected, judged and dismissed in general emergency department care, creating obstacles to their mental health recovery.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The Delphi study identified 39 key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments, emphasising person-centred, strength-based, collaborative and reflective care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The research seeks to establish a foundation for developing training programmes, education and interventions and for the integration of recovery-oriented practices in general emergency care. It thus has the potential to enhance the quality and equality of care for patients with mental ill-health in emergency care. The impact extends to nursing staff and managers as it seeks to empower them to systematically reflect on and reevaluate established emergency department practices to ensure that every person, irrespective of their health condition, is treated with dignity and respect in emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The CREDES guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The authors have nothing to report.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"565-579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Aspects of Recovery-Oriented Practice in Caring for People With Mental Ill-Health in General Emergency Departments: A Modified Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Derblom, Karuna Dahlberg, Sebastian Gabrielsson, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Jenny Molin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in caring for people with mental ill-health in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi study with three rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 24-member expert panel was recruited consisting of people with lived experience of mental ill-health, registered nurses working in emergency care, registered nurses specialised in psychiatric and mental health nursing and mental health recovery researchers. In the initial round, important aspects of recovery-oriented practice were identified through focus group interviews. Thematic analysis generated statements that were then reformulated as a questionnaire for subsequent rounds. The experts rated each statement's perceived importance on a 5-point Likert scale. The consensus level was set at ≥ 80%. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on the importance of 39 of 73 statements, with ≥ 80% deemed 'very important' in recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises the delicate balance between the essential elements of recovery-oriented practice, their practical feasibility and the predominant biomedical perspective in general emergency department care. It proposes strategies to empower nursing staff and managers to adopt recovery-oriented practices that enhance the quality of care for people with mental ill-health. Enabling staff by providing the necessary prerequisites and a care environment that supports reflective practices is crucial. The responsibility for facilitating these changes needs to be a shared commitment between nursing staff and managers.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The identified issues can serve as a framework for interventions, education and training to support the integration of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency care. They can also be used to develop tools for evaluating emergency care environments and promoting alignment with recovery-oriented principles.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Problem addressed: People with mental ill-health are at risk of being neglected, judged and dismissed in general emergency department care, creating obstacles to their mental health recovery.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The Delphi study identified 39 key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments, emphasising person-centred, strength-based, collaborative and reflective care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The research seeks to establish a foundation for developing training programmes, education and interventions and for the integration of recovery-oriented practices in general emergency care. It thus has the potential to enhance the quality and equality of care for patients with mental ill-health in emergency care. The impact extends to nursing staff and managers as it seeks to empower them to systematically reflect on and reevaluate established emergency department practices to ensure that every person, irrespective of their health condition, is treated with dignity and respect in emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The CREDES guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The authors have nothing to report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"565-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定以康复为导向的实践在普通急诊科照顾精神疾病患者的关键方面。设计:改进的德尔菲研究,共三轮。方法:招募有精神疾病生活经验的人、从事急救护理的注册护士、精神科和心理健康护理专业的注册护士以及心理健康康复研究人员组成24人专家小组。在第一轮中,通过焦点小组访谈确定了以康复为导向的实践的重要方面。专题分析产生了陈述,然后将其重新编制为后续各轮的调查表。专家们以5分的李克特量表对每个陈述的感知重要性进行评级。共识水平设定为≥80%。采用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。结果:对73项声明中的39项的重要性达成了共识,其中≥80%的人认为在普通急诊科以恢复为导向的实践中“非常重要”。结论:本研究强调了在普通急诊科护理中,以康复为导向的实践的基本要素、其实际可行性和主要的生物医学观点之间的微妙平衡。它提出了一些战略,使护理人员和管理人员能够采取以康复为导向的做法,提高对精神疾病患者的护理质量。通过提供必要的先决条件和支持反思实践的护理环境,使员工能够发挥作用至关重要。促进这些变化的责任需要在护理人员和管理人员之间共同承担。对专业和/或病人护理的影响:确定的问题可以作为干预、教育和培训的框架,以支持在一般急诊护理中整合以康复为导向的实践。它们还可用于开发评估急诊护理环境的工具,并促进与面向恢复的原则保持一致。影响:解决的问题:精神疾病患者在一般急诊科护理中有被忽视、被评判和被解雇的风险,这对他们的精神健康恢复造成了障碍。主要结果:德尔菲研究确定了普通急诊科以康复为导向的实践的39个关键方面,强调以人为本、以力量为基础、协作和反思护理。影响:这项研究旨在为制定培训方案、教育和干预措施以及将注重康复的做法纳入一般急诊护理奠定基础。因此,它有可能在紧急护理中提高对精神疾病患者的护理质量和平等。它的影响延伸到护理人员和管理人员,因为它力求使他们能够系统地反思和重新评估现有的急诊做法,以确保每个人,无论其健康状况如何,都能在急诊环境中得到尊严和尊重。报告方法:进行和报告德尔菲研究的CREDES指南。患者或公众贡献:作者无需报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Aspects of Recovery-Oriented Practice in Caring for People With Mental Ill-Health in General Emergency Departments: A Modified Delphi Study.

Aim: To identify key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in caring for people with mental ill-health in general emergency departments.

Design: A modified Delphi study with three rounds.

Methods: A 24-member expert panel was recruited consisting of people with lived experience of mental ill-health, registered nurses working in emergency care, registered nurses specialised in psychiatric and mental health nursing and mental health recovery researchers. In the initial round, important aspects of recovery-oriented practice were identified through focus group interviews. Thematic analysis generated statements that were then reformulated as a questionnaire for subsequent rounds. The experts rated each statement's perceived importance on a 5-point Likert scale. The consensus level was set at ≥ 80%. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

Results: Consensus was reached on the importance of 39 of 73 statements, with ≥ 80% deemed 'very important' in recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments.

Conclusion: The study emphasises the delicate balance between the essential elements of recovery-oriented practice, their practical feasibility and the predominant biomedical perspective in general emergency department care. It proposes strategies to empower nursing staff and managers to adopt recovery-oriented practices that enhance the quality of care for people with mental ill-health. Enabling staff by providing the necessary prerequisites and a care environment that supports reflective practices is crucial. The responsibility for facilitating these changes needs to be a shared commitment between nursing staff and managers.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The identified issues can serve as a framework for interventions, education and training to support the integration of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency care. They can also be used to develop tools for evaluating emergency care environments and promoting alignment with recovery-oriented principles.

Impact: Problem addressed: People with mental ill-health are at risk of being neglected, judged and dismissed in general emergency department care, creating obstacles to their mental health recovery.

Main results: The Delphi study identified 39 key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments, emphasising person-centred, strength-based, collaborative and reflective care.

Impact: The research seeks to establish a foundation for developing training programmes, education and interventions and for the integration of recovery-oriented practices in general emergency care. It thus has the potential to enhance the quality and equality of care for patients with mental ill-health in emergency care. The impact extends to nursing staff and managers as it seeks to empower them to systematically reflect on and reevaluate established emergency department practices to ensure that every person, irrespective of their health condition, is treated with dignity and respect in emergency department settings.

Reporting method: The CREDES guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies.

Patient or public contribution: The authors have nothing to report.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信