Katharina Derblom, Karuna Dahlberg, Sebastian Gabrielsson, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Jenny Molin
{"title":"以康复为导向的实践在普通急诊科照顾精神疾病患者的关键方面:一项修正德尔菲研究。","authors":"Katharina Derblom, Karuna Dahlberg, Sebastian Gabrielsson, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Jenny Molin","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in caring for people with mental ill-health in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi study with three rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 24-member expert panel was recruited consisting of people with lived experience of mental ill-health, registered nurses working in emergency care, registered nurses specialised in psychiatric and mental health nursing and mental health recovery researchers. In the initial round, important aspects of recovery-oriented practice were identified through focus group interviews. Thematic analysis generated statements that were then reformulated as a questionnaire for subsequent rounds. The experts rated each statement's perceived importance on a 5-point Likert scale. The consensus level was set at ≥ 80%. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on the importance of 39 of 73 statements, with ≥ 80% deemed 'very important' in recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises the delicate balance between the essential elements of recovery-oriented practice, their practical feasibility and the predominant biomedical perspective in general emergency department care. It proposes strategies to empower nursing staff and managers to adopt recovery-oriented practices that enhance the quality of care for people with mental ill-health. Enabling staff by providing the necessary prerequisites and a care environment that supports reflective practices is crucial. The responsibility for facilitating these changes needs to be a shared commitment between nursing staff and managers.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The identified issues can serve as a framework for interventions, education and training to support the integration of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency care. They can also be used to develop tools for evaluating emergency care environments and promoting alignment with recovery-oriented principles.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Problem addressed: People with mental ill-health are at risk of being neglected, judged and dismissed in general emergency department care, creating obstacles to their mental health recovery.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The Delphi study identified 39 key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments, emphasising person-centred, strength-based, collaborative and reflective care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The research seeks to establish a foundation for developing training programmes, education and interventions and for the integration of recovery-oriented practices in general emergency care. It thus has the potential to enhance the quality and equality of care for patients with mental ill-health in emergency care. The impact extends to nursing staff and managers as it seeks to empower them to systematically reflect on and reevaluate established emergency department practices to ensure that every person, irrespective of their health condition, is treated with dignity and respect in emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The CREDES guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The authors have nothing to report.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"565-579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Aspects of Recovery-Oriented Practice in Caring for People With Mental Ill-Health in General Emergency Departments: A Modified Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Derblom, Karuna Dahlberg, Sebastian Gabrielsson, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Jenny Molin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in caring for people with mental ill-health in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi study with three rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 24-member expert panel was recruited consisting of people with lived experience of mental ill-health, registered nurses working in emergency care, registered nurses specialised in psychiatric and mental health nursing and mental health recovery researchers. In the initial round, important aspects of recovery-oriented practice were identified through focus group interviews. Thematic analysis generated statements that were then reformulated as a questionnaire for subsequent rounds. The experts rated each statement's perceived importance on a 5-point Likert scale. The consensus level was set at ≥ 80%. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on the importance of 39 of 73 statements, with ≥ 80% deemed 'very important' in recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises the delicate balance between the essential elements of recovery-oriented practice, their practical feasibility and the predominant biomedical perspective in general emergency department care. It proposes strategies to empower nursing staff and managers to adopt recovery-oriented practices that enhance the quality of care for people with mental ill-health. Enabling staff by providing the necessary prerequisites and a care environment that supports reflective practices is crucial. The responsibility for facilitating these changes needs to be a shared commitment between nursing staff and managers.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The identified issues can serve as a framework for interventions, education and training to support the integration of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency care. They can also be used to develop tools for evaluating emergency care environments and promoting alignment with recovery-oriented principles.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Problem addressed: People with mental ill-health are at risk of being neglected, judged and dismissed in general emergency department care, creating obstacles to their mental health recovery.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The Delphi study identified 39 key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments, emphasising person-centred, strength-based, collaborative and reflective care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The research seeks to establish a foundation for developing training programmes, education and interventions and for the integration of recovery-oriented practices in general emergency care. It thus has the potential to enhance the quality and equality of care for patients with mental ill-health in emergency care. The impact extends to nursing staff and managers as it seeks to empower them to systematically reflect on and reevaluate established emergency department practices to ensure that every person, irrespective of their health condition, is treated with dignity and respect in emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The CREDES guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The authors have nothing to report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"565-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Key Aspects of Recovery-Oriented Practice in Caring for People With Mental Ill-Health in General Emergency Departments: A Modified Delphi Study.
Aim: To identify key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in caring for people with mental ill-health in general emergency departments.
Design: A modified Delphi study with three rounds.
Methods: A 24-member expert panel was recruited consisting of people with lived experience of mental ill-health, registered nurses working in emergency care, registered nurses specialised in psychiatric and mental health nursing and mental health recovery researchers. In the initial round, important aspects of recovery-oriented practice were identified through focus group interviews. Thematic analysis generated statements that were then reformulated as a questionnaire for subsequent rounds. The experts rated each statement's perceived importance on a 5-point Likert scale. The consensus level was set at ≥ 80%. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.
Results: Consensus was reached on the importance of 39 of 73 statements, with ≥ 80% deemed 'very important' in recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments.
Conclusion: The study emphasises the delicate balance between the essential elements of recovery-oriented practice, their practical feasibility and the predominant biomedical perspective in general emergency department care. It proposes strategies to empower nursing staff and managers to adopt recovery-oriented practices that enhance the quality of care for people with mental ill-health. Enabling staff by providing the necessary prerequisites and a care environment that supports reflective practices is crucial. The responsibility for facilitating these changes needs to be a shared commitment between nursing staff and managers.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The identified issues can serve as a framework for interventions, education and training to support the integration of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency care. They can also be used to develop tools for evaluating emergency care environments and promoting alignment with recovery-oriented principles.
Impact: Problem addressed: People with mental ill-health are at risk of being neglected, judged and dismissed in general emergency department care, creating obstacles to their mental health recovery.
Main results: The Delphi study identified 39 key aspects of recovery-oriented practice in general emergency departments, emphasising person-centred, strength-based, collaborative and reflective care.
Impact: The research seeks to establish a foundation for developing training programmes, education and interventions and for the integration of recovery-oriented practices in general emergency care. It thus has the potential to enhance the quality and equality of care for patients with mental ill-health in emergency care. The impact extends to nursing staff and managers as it seeks to empower them to systematically reflect on and reevaluate established emergency department practices to ensure that every person, irrespective of their health condition, is treated with dignity and respect in emergency department settings.
Reporting method: The CREDES guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies.
Patient or public contribution: The authors have nothing to report.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.