与卡培他滨相关的药物不良事件:基于FAERS数据库的现实世界药物警戒研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986241303428
Rongqiang Liu, Yukai Chen, Shi-Nan Wu, Wangbin Ma, Zhendong Qiu, Jianguo Wang, Ximing Xu, Chen Chen, Weixing Wang
{"title":"与卡培他滨相关的药物不良事件:基于FAERS数据库的现实世界药物警戒研究。","authors":"Rongqiang Liu, Yukai Chen, Shi-Nan Wu, Wangbin Ma, Zhendong Qiu, Jianguo Wang, Ximing Xu, Chen Chen, Weixing Wang","doi":"10.1177/20420986241303428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is extensively utilized for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer. Nevertheless, there exist limitations in comprehending adverse reactions (AEs) in clinical practice. In this study, we investigated the distribution of AEs associated with capecitabine and explored potential rare adverse reactions by mining the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our research aimed to explore the spectrum of AEs associated with capecitabine, including both documented and potential events, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the drug's safety profile and guide clinical practice. At the same time, it provides a new direction for further research on AEs associated with capecitabine in the future.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We collected capecitabine-related adverse reactions from the FAERS and standardized the classification of AEs using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 26.0. Four statistical schemes were used to analyze the obtained standardized signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected AEs reported for capecitabine from the FAERS between 2004 and 2023. To ensure standardized data, the collected reports related to capecitabine-associated adverse events were categorized using the preferred terms (PTs) and system organ classes (SOCs) classifications provided by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 26.0. Statistical analysis involved the utilization of reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. Four statistical schemes were employed to analyze the adverse reactions associated with capecitabine. A positive signal was considered when all four schemes indicated an association with the adverse event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected a total of 45,011 AEs associated with the use of capecitabine from the database, covering 27 SOCs from 2004 to 2023. The nine SOC categories with the highest number of events were identified, which include gastrointestinal disorders; general disorders and administration site conditions; skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders; nervous system disorders; investigations, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications; blood and lymphatic system disorders; metabolism and nutrition disorders; infections and infestations; and neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified (including cysts and polyps). Among these 27 SOCs, we identified seven SOCs that met the signal value criteria. Notably, we discovered AEs not mentioned in the instructions, including intestinal obstruction in gastrointestinal disorders, penetrating aortic ulcer in cardiac disorders, and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in hepatobiliary disorders, all of which exhibited signals. Furthermore, 40.1% of AEs associated with the use of capecitabine occurred within the first 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study conducted a comprehensive analysis of capecitabine's AEs using the FAERS database. We identified previously unreported AEs, mitigating the risk for patients and ensuring safe drug administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"15 ","pages":"20420986241303428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse drug events associated with capecitabine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.\",\"authors\":\"Rongqiang Liu, Yukai Chen, Shi-Nan Wu, Wangbin Ma, Zhendong Qiu, Jianguo Wang, Ximing Xu, Chen Chen, Weixing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986241303428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is extensively utilized for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer. Nevertheless, there exist limitations in comprehending adverse reactions (AEs) in clinical practice. In this study, we investigated the distribution of AEs associated with capecitabine and explored potential rare adverse reactions by mining the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our research aimed to explore the spectrum of AEs associated with capecitabine, including both documented and potential events, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the drug's safety profile and guide clinical practice. At the same time, it provides a new direction for further research on AEs associated with capecitabine in the future.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We collected capecitabine-related adverse reactions from the FAERS and standardized the classification of AEs using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 26.0. Four statistical schemes were used to analyze the obtained standardized signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected AEs reported for capecitabine from the FAERS between 2004 and 2023. To ensure standardized data, the collected reports related to capecitabine-associated adverse events were categorized using the preferred terms (PTs) and system organ classes (SOCs) classifications provided by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 26.0. Statistical analysis involved the utilization of reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. Four statistical schemes were employed to analyze the adverse reactions associated with capecitabine. A positive signal was considered when all four schemes indicated an association with the adverse event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected a total of 45,011 AEs associated with the use of capecitabine from the database, covering 27 SOCs from 2004 to 2023. The nine SOC categories with the highest number of events were identified, which include gastrointestinal disorders; general disorders and administration site conditions; skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders; nervous system disorders; investigations, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications; blood and lymphatic system disorders; metabolism and nutrition disorders; infections and infestations; and neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified (including cysts and polyps). Among these 27 SOCs, we identified seven SOCs that met the signal value criteria. Notably, we discovered AEs not mentioned in the instructions, including intestinal obstruction in gastrointestinal disorders, penetrating aortic ulcer in cardiac disorders, and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in hepatobiliary disorders, all of which exhibited signals. Furthermore, 40.1% of AEs associated with the use of capecitabine occurred within the first 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study conducted a comprehensive analysis of capecitabine's AEs using the FAERS database. We identified previously unreported AEs, mitigating the risk for patients and ensuring safe drug administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"20420986241303428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241303428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241303428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卡培他滨是5-氟尿嘧啶的前药,广泛用于转移性乳腺癌、结直肠癌和胃癌的治疗。然而,在临床实践中,对不良反应(ae)的理解存在局限性。在这项研究中,我们调查了卡培他滨相关ae的分布,并通过挖掘美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)来探索潜在的罕见不良反应。目的:我们的研究旨在探索与卡培他滨相关的ae,包括已记录的和潜在的事件,以提供对药物安全性的全面了解并指导临床实践。同时也为今后卡培他滨相关ae的进一步研究提供了新的方向。设计:我们从FAERS中收集卡培他滨相关不良反应,并使用监管活动医学词典26.0对ae进行标准化分类。采用四种统计方案对得到的标准化信号进行分析。方法:收集2004年至2023年FAERS报告的卡培他滨ae。为了确保数据的标准化,收集的卡培他滨相关不良事件的相关报告使用监管活动医学词典26.0提供的首选术语(PTs)和系统器官类别(soc)分类。统计分析采用报告优势比、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和多项目伽玛泊松收缩法。采用4种统计方案分析卡培他滨相关不良反应。当所有四种方案都表明与不良事件有关时,认为是积极的信号。结果:我们从数据库中共收集了45,011例与卡培他滨使用相关的ae,涵盖2004年至2023年的27例soc。确定了9个事件最多的SOC类别,包括胃肠道疾病;一般紊乱和行政现场情况;皮肤和皮下组织疾病;神经系统紊乱;调查、伤害、中毒和程序性并发症;血液和淋巴系统疾病;代谢和营养紊乱;感染和侵扰;良性、恶性和未明确的肿瘤(包括囊肿和息肉)。在这27个soc中,我们确定了7个符合信号值标准的soc。值得注意的是,我们发现了说明书中没有提到的ae,包括胃肠道疾病的肠梗阻,心脏疾病的穿透性主动脉溃疡,肝胆疾病的非肝硬化门脉高压,这些都表现出信号。此外,40.1%的卡培他滨相关ae发生在前30天内。结论:我们的研究使用FAERS数据库对卡培他滨的ae进行了全面分析。我们发现了以前未报道的不良事件,减轻了患者的风险,并确保了安全的给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse drug events associated with capecitabine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.

Background: Capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is extensively utilized for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer. Nevertheless, there exist limitations in comprehending adverse reactions (AEs) in clinical practice. In this study, we investigated the distribution of AEs associated with capecitabine and explored potential rare adverse reactions by mining the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Objectives: Our research aimed to explore the spectrum of AEs associated with capecitabine, including both documented and potential events, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the drug's safety profile and guide clinical practice. At the same time, it provides a new direction for further research on AEs associated with capecitabine in the future.

Design: We collected capecitabine-related adverse reactions from the FAERS and standardized the classification of AEs using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 26.0. Four statistical schemes were used to analyze the obtained standardized signals.

Methods: We collected AEs reported for capecitabine from the FAERS between 2004 and 2023. To ensure standardized data, the collected reports related to capecitabine-associated adverse events were categorized using the preferred terms (PTs) and system organ classes (SOCs) classifications provided by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 26.0. Statistical analysis involved the utilization of reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. Four statistical schemes were employed to analyze the adverse reactions associated with capecitabine. A positive signal was considered when all four schemes indicated an association with the adverse event.

Results: We collected a total of 45,011 AEs associated with the use of capecitabine from the database, covering 27 SOCs from 2004 to 2023. The nine SOC categories with the highest number of events were identified, which include gastrointestinal disorders; general disorders and administration site conditions; skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders; nervous system disorders; investigations, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications; blood and lymphatic system disorders; metabolism and nutrition disorders; infections and infestations; and neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified (including cysts and polyps). Among these 27 SOCs, we identified seven SOCs that met the signal value criteria. Notably, we discovered AEs not mentioned in the instructions, including intestinal obstruction in gastrointestinal disorders, penetrating aortic ulcer in cardiac disorders, and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in hepatobiliary disorders, all of which exhibited signals. Furthermore, 40.1% of AEs associated with the use of capecitabine occurred within the first 30 days.

Conclusion: Our study conducted a comprehensive analysis of capecitabine's AEs using the FAERS database. We identified previously unreported AEs, mitigating the risk for patients and ensuring safe drug administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信